Royston Goodacre

Prof. Royston Goodacre


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 September 2007 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lloyd W. SumnerLloyd W. Sumner
Lloyd W. Sumner
AAAlexander Amberg
Alexander Amberg
DBDave Barrett
Dave Barrett
MBMichael H. Beale
Michael H. Beale
Richard BegerRichard Beger
Richard Beger
MVMark Viant
Mark Viant

3 September 2019 in ACS Nano
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJudith Langer
Judith Langer
DADorleta Jimenez De Aberasturi
Dorleta Jimenez De Aberasturi
JAJavier Aizpurua
Javier Aizpurua
Ramon Alvarez-PueblaRamon Alvarez-Puebla
Ramon Alvarez-Puebla
BABaptiste Auguié
Baptiste Auguié
LLLuis M. Liz-Marzán
Luis M. Liz-Marzán
The discovery in 1974 of the enhancement of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on nanostructured metal surfaces is considered a landmark in the history of spectroscopic and analytical techniques. Much experimental and theoretical effort has been spent toward understanding the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect, and demonstrating its potential toward various types of ultrasensitive sensing applications in a wide variety of fields. Forty five years later, SERS has blossomed as an extremely rich area of research and technology, but additional efforts are still needed before it can be routinely used as a commercial product. In this Review, prominent authors from all over the world joined efforts to summarize the current state-of-the-art in understanding and using SERS, as well as to propose what can be expected in the near future, in terms of research, applications, and technological development.

1 July 2018 in Journal of Analysis and Testing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYun Xu
Yun Xu
RGRoyston Goodacre
Royston Goodacre
Model validation is the most important part of building a supervised model. For building a model with good generalization performance one must have a sensible data splitting strategy, and this is crucial for model validation. In this study, we conducted a comparative study on various reported data splitting methods. The MixSim model was employed to generate nine simulated datasets with different probabilities of mis-classification and variable sample sizes. Then partial least squares for discriminant analysis and support vector machines for classification were applied to these datasets. Data splitting methods tested included variants of cross-validation, bootstrapping, bootstrapped Latin partition, Kennard-Stone algorithm (K-S) and sample set partitioning based on joint X–Y distances algorithm (SPXY). These methods were employed to split the data into training and validation sets. The estimated generalization performances from the validation sets were then compared with the ones obtained from the blind test sets which were generated from the same distribution but were unseen by the training/validation procedure used in model construction. The results showed that the size of the data is the deciding factor for the qualities of the generalization performance estimated from the validation set. We found that there was a significant gap between the performance estimated from the validation set and the one from the test set for the all the data splitting methods employed on small datasets. Such disparity decreased when more samples were available for training/validation, and this is because the models were then moving towards approximations of the central limit theory for the simulated datasets used. We also found that having too many or too few samples in the training set had a negative effect on the estimated model performance, suggesting that it is necessary to have a good balance between the sizes of training set and validation set to have a reliable estimation of model performance. We also found that systematic sampling method such as K-S and SPXY generally had very poor estimation of the model performance, most likely due to the fact that they are designed to take the most representative samples first and thus left a rather poorly representative sample set for model performance estimation.

1 June 2015 in Analytica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PGPiotr S. Gromski
Piotr S. Gromski
HMHowbeer Muhamadali
Howbeer Muhamadali
David EllisDavid Ellis
David Ellis
YXYun Xu
Yun Xu
ECElon Correa
Elon Correa
RGRoyston Goodacre
Royston Goodacre

25 April 2006 in The Analyst
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
David EllisDavid Ellis
David Ellis
RGRoyston Goodacre
Royston Goodacre
The ability to diagnose the early onset of disease, rapidly, non-invasively and unequivocally has multiple benefits. These include the early intervention of therapeutic strategies leading to a reduction in morbidity and mortality, and the releasing of economic resources within overburdened health care systems. Some of the routine clinical tests currently in use are known to be unsuitable or unreliable. In addition, these often rely on single disease markers which are inappropriate when multiple factors are involved. Many diseases are a result of metabolic disorders, therefore it is logical to measure metabolism directly. One of the strategies employed by the emergent science of metabolomics is metabolic fingerprinting; which involves rapid, high-throughput global analysis to discriminate between samples of different biological status or origin. This review focuses on a selective number of recent studies where metabolic fingerprinting has been forwarded as a potential tool for disease diagnosis using infrared and Raman spectroscopies.

17 August 2007 in Metabolomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Oliver FiehnOliver Fiehn
Oliver Fiehn
DRDon Robertson
Don Robertson
JGJules Griffin
Jules Griffin
MWMariet van der Werf
Mariet van der Werf
BNBasil Nikolau
Basil Nikolau
SSSusanna-Assunta Sansone
Susanna-Assunta Sansone