Bora Lim

Dr. Bora Lim

Department of Oncology Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2021 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniel McGrail
Daniel McGrail
PPP.G. Pilié
P.G. Pilié
NRN.U. Rashid
N.U. Rashid
LVL. Voorwerk
L. Voorwerk
MSM. Slagter
M. Slagter
SLShiaw-Yih Lin
Shiaw-Yih Lin
High tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), largely due to the potential for tumor mutations to generate immunogenic neoantigens. Despite recent pan-cancer approval of ICB treatment for any TMB-H tumor, as assessed by the targeted FoundationOne CDx assay in nine tumor types, the utility of this biomarker has not been fully demonstrated across all cancers. Data from over 10 000 patient tumors included in The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to compare approaches to determine TMB and identify the correlation between predicted neoantigen load and CD8 T cells. Association of TMB with ICB treatment outcomes was analyzed by both objective response rates (ORRs, N = 1551) and overall survival (OS, N = 1936). In cancer types where CD8 T-cell levels positively correlated with neoantigen load, such as melanoma, lung, and bladder cancers, TMB-H tumors exhibited a 39.8% ORR to ICB [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.9-44.8], which was significantly higher than that observed in low TMB (TMB-L) tumors [odds ratio (OR) = 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8, P < 2 × 10-16]. In cancer types that showed no relationship between CD8 T-cell levels and neoantigen load, such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, and glioma, TMB-H tumors failed to achieve a 20% ORR (ORR = 15.3%, 95% CI 9.2-23.4, P = 0.95), and exhibited a significantly lower ORR relative to TMB-L tumors (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.88, P = 0.02). Bulk ORRs were not significantly different between the two categories of tumors (P = 0.10) for patient cohorts assessed. Equivalent results were obtained by analyzing OS and by treating TMB as a continuous variable. Our analysis failed to support application of TMB-H as a biomarker for treatment with ICB in all solid cancer types. Further tumor type-specific studies are warranted.

28 June 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TKTapsi Kumar
Tapsi Kumar
KNKevin Nee
Kevin Nee
RWRunmin Wei
Runmin Wei
SHSiyuan He
Siyuan He
QNQuy H. Nguyen
Quy H. Nguyen
NNNicholas Navin
Nicholas Navin

27 April 2018 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BLBora Lim
Bora Lim
WWWendy A. Woodward
Wendy A. Woodward
XWXiaoping Wang
Xiaoping Wang
JRJames M. Reuben
James M. Reuben
Naoto T UenoNaoto T Ueno
Naoto T Ueno

13 April 2020 in Cancer Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BLBora Lim
Bora Lim
YLYiyun Lin
Yiyun Lin
NNNicholas Navin
Nicholas Navin

24 March 2021 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDarlan C. Minussi
Darlan C. Minussi
MNMichael D. Nicholson
Michael D. Nicholson
HYHanghui Ye
Hanghui Ye
ADAlexander Davis
Alexander Davis
KWKaile Wang
Kaile Wang
NNNicholas E. Navin
Nicholas E. Navin

21 September 2020 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PLPeishan Li
Peishan Li
MLMing Lu
Ming Lu
JSJiayuan Shi
Jiayuan Shi
ZGZheng Gong
Zheng Gong
LHLi Hua
Li Hua
Guangwen "Gary" RenGuangwen "Gary" Ren
Guangwen "Gary" Ren