Objectives: This study tested the hypothesis that early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator offered additional benefits in improving 30-day outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: Between May 1993 and July 2002, 920 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these patients, 12.5% (115) with cardiogenic shock were enrolled in this study (group 1). Between August 2002 and December 2009, 1650 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these patients, 13.3% (219) complicated with cardiogenic shock were enrolled (group 2). Results: The incidence of profound shock (defined as systolic blood pressure remaining ≤75 mm Hg after intra-aortic balloon pump and inotropic agent supports) was similar in both groups (21.7% vs. 21.0%, p > .5). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support, which was available only for patients in group 2, was performed in the catheterization room. The results demonstrated that final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction grade 3 flow in infarct-related artery was similar between the two groups (p = .678). However, total 30-day mortality and the mortality of patients with profound shock were lower in group 2 than in group 1 (all p < .04). Additionally, the hospital survival time was remarkably longer in patients in group 2 than in patients in group 1 (p = .0005). Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that unsuccessful reperfusion, presence of advanced congestive heart failure, profound shock, and age were independent predictors of 30-day mortality (all p < .02). Conclusion: Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with complicated with profound cardiogenic shock.

Although recent studies suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) achieves clinical outcomes comparable to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease, long-term studies are rarely performed. This study reviewed outcomes in 363 patients undergoing CABG (n=216), PCI with DES (n=94) or PCI with bare-metal stent (BMS) (n=53) for ULMCA stenosis between January 2000 and March 2007. The CABG group had more patients with diabetes (50.5%) and 3- or 4-vessel disease (77.3%) than the PCI group. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates showed higher TLR-free survival and revascularization-free survival in CABG group. Although cardiac-death-free survival did not significantly differ between the 3 groups, the DES group had the highest overall survival. Age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.060; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017-1.104) and diffuseness score (HR: 1.157; 95%CI: 1.019-1.313) were significant independent risk factors for cardiac death. There was higher TLR in the PCI group with either DES or BMS, but cardiac death did not significantly differ between the 3 groups. Advanced age and diffuse coronary atherosclerosis may increase the risk of cardiac death following revascularization.