Roald M. Tiggelaar

Dr. Roald M. Tiggelaar

NanoLab cleanroom, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, Enschede, The Netherlands
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2009 in Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
RSR.G.P. Sanders
R.G.P. Sanders
AGA.W. Groenland
A.W. Groenland
HGHan Gardeniers
Han Gardeniers

22 August 2018 in Electrophoresis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Brigitte BruijnsBrigitte Bruijns
Brigitte Bruijns
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
HGHan Gardeniers
Han Gardeniers
DNA sequencing, starting with Sanger's chain termination method in 1977 and evolving into the next generation sequencing (NGS) techniques of today that employ massively parallel sequencing (MPS), has become essential in application areas such as biotechnology, virology, and medical diagnostics. Reflected by the growing number of articles published over the last 2–3 years, these techniques have also gained attention in the forensic field. This review contains a brief description of first, second, and third generation sequencing techniques, and focuses on the recent developments in human DNA analysis applicable in the forensic field. Relevance to the forensic analysis is that besides generation of standard STR‐profiles, DNA repeats can also be sequenced to look for polymorphisms. Furthermore, additional SNPs can be sequenced to acquire information on ancestry, paternity or phenotype. The current MPS systems are also very helpful in cases where only a limited amount of DNA or highly degraded DNA has been secured from a crime scene. If enough autosomal DNA is not present, mitochondrial DNA can be sequenced for maternal lineage analysis. These developments clearly demonstrate that the use of NGS will grow into an indispensable tool for forensic science.

5 August 2016 in Biosensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Brigitte BruijnsBrigitte Bruijns
Brigitte Bruijns
AAArian Van Asten
Arian Van Asten
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
HGHan Gardeniers
Han Gardeniers
Microfluidic devices may offer various advantages for forensic DNA analysis, such as reduced risk of contamination, shorter analysis time and direct application at the crime scene. Microfluidic chip technology has already proven to be functional and effective within medical applications, such as for point-of-care use. In the forensic field, one may expect microfluidic technology to become particularly relevant for the analysis of biological traces containing human DNA. This would require a number of consecutive steps, including sample work up, DNA amplification and detection, as well as secure storage of the sample. This article provides an extensive overview of microfluidic devices for cell lysis, DNA extraction and purification, DNA amplification and detection and analysis techniques for DNA. Topics to be discussed are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on-chip, digital PCR (dPCR), isothermal amplification on-chip, chip materials, integrated devices and commercially available techniques. A critical overview of the opportunities and challenges of the use of chips is discussed, and developments made in forensic DNA analysis over the past 10–20 years with microfluidic systems are described. Areas in which further research is needed are indicated in a future outlook.

15 January 2018 in Nature Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WVWouter Vijselaar
Wouter Vijselaar
PWPieter Westerik
Pieter Westerik
JVJanneke Veerbeek
Janneke Veerbeek
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
EBErwin Berenschot
Erwin Berenschot
JHJurriaan Huskens
Jurriaan Huskens

1 July 2007 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
Fernando Benito-LopezFernando Benito-Lopez
Fernando Benito-Lopez
DHDorothee C. Hermes
Dorothee C. Hermes
HRHelmut Rathgen
Helmut Rathgen
RERichard J.M. Egberink
Richard J.M. Egberink
HGHan Gardeniers
Han Gardeniers

11 June 2018 in Journal of Forensic Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Brigitte BruijnsBrigitte Bruijns
Brigitte Bruijns
Roald M. TiggelaarRoald M. Tiggelaar
Roald M. Tiggelaar
HGHan Gardeniers
Han Gardeniers
The extraction and recovery efficiency of swabs used to collect evidence at crime scenes is relatively low (typically <50%) for bacterial spores and body fluids. Cell‐free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is an interesting alternative compared to whole cells as a source for forensic analysis, but extraction and recovery from swabs has not been tested before using pure DNA. In this study cotton, foam, nylon flocked, polyester and rayon swabs are investigated in order to collect pure DNA isolated from saliva samples. The morphology and absorption capacity of swabs is studied. Extraction and recovery efficiencies are determined and compared to the maximum theoretical efficiency. The results indicate that a substantial part of DNA is not extracted from the swab and some types of swab seem to bind effectively with DNA. The efficiency of the different types of swab never exceeds 50%. The nylon flocked 4N6FLOQSwab used for buccal sampling performs the best.