Peter Francis

Dr. Peter Francis

Department of Science and Health, Institute of Technology Carlow, R93 V960 Carlow, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

45Years (1982-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Physical Therapy in Sport
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AJAshley Jones
Ashley Jones
GJGareth Jones
Gareth Jones
NGNeil Greig
Neil Greig
PBPaul Bower
Paul Bower
JBJames Brown
James Brown
Peter FrancisPeter Francis
Peter Francis
To estimate the current incidence and location of injury in English professional football. Prospective cohort study conducted over one competitive season (2015/16). Professional football players competing in the English Football League and National Conference. 243 players from 10 squads (24.3 ± 4.21 per squad). Injury incidence, training and match exposure were collected in accordance with the international consensus statement on football injury epidemiology. 473 injuries were reported. The estimated incidence of injury was, 9.11 injuries/1000 h of football related activity. There was a higher incidence of injury during match play (24.29/1000 h) compared to training (6.84/1000 h). The thigh was the most common site of injury (31.7%), muscle strains accounted for 41.2% of all injuries. The hamstrings were the most frequently strained muscle group, accounting for 39.5% of all muscle strains and 16.3% of all injuries. Moderate severity injuries (8-28 days) were the most common (44.2%). Incidence of injury has increased over the last 16 years with muscle strains remaining the most prevalent injury. The hamstrings remain the most commonly injured muscle group.

7 January 2016 in Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Peter FrancisPeter Francis
Peter Francis
Clodagh ToomeyClodagh Toomey
Clodagh Toomey
WCWilliam Mc Cormack
William Mc Cormack
MLMark Lyons
Mark Lyons
Phil JakemanPhil Jakeman
Phil Jakeman


4 April 2017 in Biogerontology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peter FrancisPeter Francis
Peter Francis
MLMark Lyons
Mark Lyons
MPMathew Piasecki
Mathew Piasecki
JPJamie Mc Phee
Jamie Mc Phee
KHKaren Hind
Karen Hind
Phil JakemanPhil Jakeman
Phil Jakeman
Muscle health is a critical component in the struggle against physical frailty and the efforts to maintain metabolic health until the limit of chronological age. Consensus opinion is to evaluate muscle health in terms of muscle mass, strength and functional capability. There has been considerable variability in the components of muscle health which have been investigated in addition to variability in the tools of assessment and protocol for measurement. This is in stark contrast to the validated measurement of bone health across the adult life span. The purpose of this review was to identify indices of muscle mass, strength and functional capability most responsive to change with ageing and where possible to provide an estimate of the rate of change. We suggest lean tissue mass (LTM) or skeletal muscle (SM) is best evaluated from the thigh region due to its greater responsiveness to ageing compared to the whole body. The anterior compartment of the thigh region undergoes a preferential age-related decline in SM and force generating capacity. Therefore, we suggest that knee extensor torque is measured to represent the force generating capacity of the thigh and subsequently, to express muscle quality (strength per unit tissue). Finally, we suggest measures of functional capability which allow participants perform to a greater maximum are most appropriate to track age-related difference in functional capacity across the adult lifespan. This is due to their ability encompass a broad spectrum of abilities. This review suggests indices of muscular health for which reference ranges can be generated across the lifespan.

16 July 2021 in BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LMLawrence Mayhew
Lawrence Mayhew
Mark I. JohnsonMark I. Johnson
Mark I. Johnson
Peter FrancisPeter Francis
Peter Francis
CLChristoph Lutter
Christoph Lutter
AAAli Alali
Ali Alali
GJGareth Jones
Gareth Jones
Aim: To estimate the incidence of injury in adult elite women’s football and to characterise the nature and anatomical location of injuries.Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources: Combinations of the key terms were entered into the following electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Science Direct and Discover) from inception to May 2021.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: (1) Used a prospective cohort design; (2) captured data on elite adult women players; (3) reported injury incidence by anatomical site; (4) captured data of at least one season or national team tournament; (5) included a definition of injury; and (6) written in English.Results: The search identified 1378 records. Twelve studies published between 1991 and 2018 were included in our review and sampled 129 teams. In domestic club football, injury incidence rate was estimated to be 5.7/1000 hours (total), 19.5/1000 hours (match) and 3.1/1000 hours (training). In tournament, football match incidence was estimated to be 55.7/1000 hours. The knee (22.8%; 368/1822) was the most common site of injury in domestic club football. The ankle (23.7%, 105/443) was the most common site of injury in tournament football. Ligament sprains were the most common type of injury (27.8%), followed by muscle strains (19.1%). Severn studies (58%) had a high risk of bias associated with exposure definition and measurement and considerable heterogeneity exists between the included studies (I2=49.7%–95%).Summary/conclusion: Ligament sprains occur more frequently in adult elite women football players. We advise caution in interpretating point estimates of the incidence of injury due to high statistical heterogeneity. Standardising injury reporting and the accurate recording of match and training exposure will overcome such limitations.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019130407.su

8 December 2016 in Biogerontology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Peter FrancisPeter Francis
Peter Francis
WCWilliam Mc Cormack
William Mc Cormack
Clodagh ToomeyClodagh Toomey
Clodagh Toomey
CNCatherine Norton
Catherine Norton
JSJean Saunders
Jean Saunders
Phil JakemanPhil Jakeman
Phil Jakeman
The age-related decline in functional capability is preceded by a reduction in muscle quality. The purpose of this study was to assess the combined effects of progressive resistance training (PRT) and protein supplementation beyond habitual intakes on upper leg lean tissue mass (LTM), muscle quality and functional capability in healthy 50–70 years women. In a single-blinded, randomized, controlled design, 57 healthy older women (age 61.1 ± 5.1 years, 1.61 ± 0.65 m, 65.3 ± 15.3 kg) consumed 0.33 g/kg body mass of a milk-based protein matrix (PRO) for 12 weeks. Of the 57 women, 29 also engaged in a PRT intervention (PRO + PRT). In comparison to the PRO group (n = 28), those in the PRO + PRT group had an increase in upper leg LTM [0.04 (95% CI −0.07 to 0.01) kg vs. 0.13 (95% CI 0.08–0.18) kg, P = 0.027], as measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; an increase in knee extensor (KE) torque [−1.6 (95% CI −7.3 to 4.4 N m) vs. 10.2 (95% CI 4.3–15.8 N m), P = 0.007], as measured from a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (Con-Trex MJ; CMV AG); and an increase in extended gait speed [-0.01 (95% CI −0.52–0.04) m s−1 vs. 0.10 (95% CI 0.05–0.22) m s−1, P = 0.001] as measured from a maximal 900 m effort. There was no difference between groups in the time taken to complete 5 chair rises or the number of chair rises performed in 30 s (P > 0.05). PRT in healthy older women ingesting a dietary protein supplement is an effective strategy to improve upper leg LTM, KE torque and extended gait speed in healthy older women.