Most pancreatic cancer patients present with inoperable disease or develop metastases after surgery. Conventional therapies are usually ineffective in treating metastatic disease. It is evident that novel therapies remain to be developed. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) plays a key role in cancer metastasis, signaling through the TGF-β type I/II receptors (TβRI/II). We hypothesized that targeting TβRI/II kinase activity with the novel inhibitor LY2109761 would suppress pancreatic cancer metastatic processes. The effect of LY2109761 has been evaluated on soft agar growth, migration, invasion using a fibroblast coculture model, and detachment-induced apoptosis (anoikis) by Annexin V flow cytometric analysis. The efficacy of LY2109761 on tumor growth, survival, and reduction of spontaneous metastasis have been evaluated in an orthotopic murine model of metastatic pancreatic cancer expressing both luciferase and green fluorescence proteins (L3.6pl/GLT). To determine whether pancreatic cancer cells or the cells in the liver microenvironment were involved in LY2109761-mediated reduction of liver metastasis, we used a model of experimental liver metastasis. LY2109761 significantly inhibited the L3.6pl/GLT soft agar growth, suppressed both basal and TGF-β1−induced cell migration and invasion, and induced anoikis. In vivo, LY2109761, in combination with gemcitabine, significantly reduced the tumor burden, prolonged survival, and reduced spontaneous abdominal metastases. Results from the experimental liver metastasis models indicate an important role for targeting TβRI/II kinase activity on tumor and liver microenvironment cells in suppressing liver metastasis. Targeting TβRI/II kinase activity on pancreatic cancer cells or the cells of the liver microenvironment represents a novel therapeutic approach to prevent pancreatic cancer metastasis. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(4):829–40]

Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) autocrine signaling pathway is involved in cancer development and progression. EGFR inhibitors such as C225 (cetuximab), a chimeric human-mouse anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, and ZD1839 (gefitinib), a small molecule EGFR-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, are in advanced clinical development. The potential emergence of cancer cell resistance in EGFR-expressing cancers treated with EGFR inhibitors could determine lack of activity of these drugs in some cancer patients. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is secreted by cancer cells and plays a key role in the regulation of tumor-induced endothelial cell proliferation and permeability. ZD6474 is a small molecule VEGF flk-1/KDR (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that also demonstrates inhibitory activity against EGFR tyrosine kinase. Experimental Design: The antitumor activity of ZD1839, C225, and ZD6474 was tested in athymic mice bearing human GEO colon cancer xenografts. GEO cell lines resistant to EGFR inhibitors were established from GEO xenografts growing in mice treated chronically with ZD1839 or C225. Expression of EGFR was evaluated by flow cytometry. Expression of various proteins involved in intracellular cell signaling was assessed by Western blotting. Tumor growth data were evaluated for statistical significance using the Student’s t test. All Ps were two-sided. Results: Although chronic administration of optimal doses of C225 or ZD1839 efficiently blocked GEO tumor growth in the majority of mice, tumors slowly started to grow within 80–90 days, despite continuous treatment. In contrast, continuous treatment of mice bearing established GEO xenografts with ZD6474 resulted in efficient tumor growth inhibition for the entire duration of dosing (up to 150 days). ZD6474 activity was also determined in mice pretreated with ZD1839 or C225. When GEO growth was apparent after 4 weeks of treatment with EGFR inhibitors, mice were either re-treated with EGFR inhibitors or treated with ZD6474. GEO tumor growth was blocked only in mice treated with ZD6474, whereas tumor progression was observed in mice re-treated with C225 or ZD1839. GEO tumors growing during treatment with C225 or with ZD1839 were established as cell lines (GEO-C225-RES and GEO-ZD1839-RES, respectively). Cell membrane-associated EGFR expression was only slightly reduced in these cell lines compared with parental GEO cells. Western blotting revealed no major change in the expression of the EGFR ligand transforming growth factor α of bcl-2, bcl-xL, p53, p27, MDM-2, akt, activated phospho-akt, or mitogen-activated protein kinase. However, both GEO-C225-RES and GEO-ZD1839-RES cells exhibited a 5–10-fold increase in activated phospho-mitogen-activated protein kinase and in the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and of VEGF compared with GEO cells. GEO-C225-RES and GEO-ZD1839-RES growth as xenografts in nude mice was not significantly affected by treatment with either C225 or ZD1839 but was efficiently inhibited by ZD6474. Conclusions: Long-term treatment of GEO xenografts with selective EGFR inhibitors results in the development of EGFR inhibitor-resistant cancer cells. Growth of EGFR inhibitor-resistant tumors can be inhibited by ZD6474. These data indicate that inhibition of VEGF signaling has potential as an anticancer strategy, even in tumors that are resistant to EGF inhibitors.

Background Galunisertib is the first-in-class, first-in-human, oral small-molecule type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor (ALK5) serine/threonine kinase inhibitor to enter clinical development. The effect of galunisertib vs. placebo in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer was determined. Methods This was a two-part, multinational study: phase 1b was a non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, and dose-escalation study; phase 2 was a randomised, placebo- and Bayesian-augmented controlled, double-blind study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma considered candidates for first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine. Patients were randomised 2:1 to galunisertib–gemcitabine (N = 104) or placebo-gemcitabine (N = 52). Gemcitabine dose was 1000 mg/m² QW. Primary endpoints for phases 1b and 2, respectively, were phase 2 dose and overall survival. Secondary objectives included tolerability and biomarkers. Results Dose-escalation suggested a 300-mg/day dose. Primary objective was met: median survival times were 8.9 and 7.1 months for galunisertib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79 [95% credible interval: 0.59–1.09] and posterior probability HR < 1 = 0.93). Lower baseline biomarkers macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 were associated with galunisertib benefit. Conclusions Galunisertib–gemcitabine combination improved overall survival vs. gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, with minimal added toxicity. Future exploration of galunisertib in pancreatic cancer is ongoing in combination with durvalumab.

Pemigatinib, a selective FGFR1–3 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in FIGHT-202, a phase II study in patients with cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, and has gained regulatory approval in the United States. Eligibility for FIGHT-202 was assessed using genomic profiling; here, these data were utilized to characterize the genomic landscape of cholangiocarcinoma and to uncover unique molecular features of patients harboring FGFR2 rearrangements. The results highlight the high percentage of patients with cholangiocarcinoma harboring potentially actionable genomic alterations and the diversity in gene partners that rearrange with FGFR2. Clinicogenomic analysis of pemigatinib-treated patients identified mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance. Genomic subsets of patients with other potentially actionable FGF/FGFR alterations were also identified. Our study provides a framework for molecularly guided clinical trials and underscores the importance of genomic profiling to enable a deeper understanding of the molecular basis for response and nonresponse to targeted therapy. Significance: We utilized genomic profiling data from FIGHT-202 to gain insights into the genomic landscape of cholangiocarcinoma, to understand the molecular diversity of patients with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, and to interrogate the clinicogenomics of patients treated with pemigatinib. Our study highlights the utility of genomic profiling in clinical trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 211

Altered expression of secreted factors by tumor cells or cells of the tumor microenvironment is a key event in cancer development and progression. In the last decade, emerging evidences supported the autocrine and paracrine activity of the members of the Angiopoietin-like (ANGPTL) protein family in angiogenesis, inflammation and in the regulation of different steps of carcinogenesis and metastasis development. Thus, ANGPTL proteins become attractive either as prognostic or predictive biomarkers, or as novel target for cancer treatment. Here, we outline the current knowledge about the functions of the ANGPTL proteins in angiogenesis, cancer progression and metastasis. Moreover, we discuss the most recent evidences sustaining their role as prognostic or predictive biomarkers for cancer therapy. Although the role of ANGPTL proteins in cancer has not been fully elucidated, increasing evidence suggest their key effects in the proliferative and invasive properties of cancer cells. Moreover, given the common overexpression of ANGPTL proteins in several aggressive solid tumors, and their role in tumor cells and cells of the tumor microenvironment, the field of research about ANGPTL proteins network may highlight new potential targets for the development of future therapeutic strategies.

Background We assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) receptor inhibitor galunisertib co-administered with the anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody durvalumab in recurrent/refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer previously treated with ≤2 systemic regimens. Methods This was a two-part, single-arm, multinational, phase Ib study. In a dose-finding phase, escalating oral doses of galunisertib were co-administered on days 1–14 with fixed-dose intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg on day 1 every 4 weeks (Q4W), followed by an expansion cohort phase. Results The galunisertib recommended phase II dose (RP2D) when co-administered with durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W was 150 mg two times per day. No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded. Among 32 patients treated with galunisertib RP2D, 1 patient had partial response, 7 had stable disease, 15 had objective progressive disease, and 9 were not evaluable. Disease control rate was 25.0%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 5.72 months (95% CI: 4.01 to 8.38) and 1.87 months (95% CI: 1.58 to 3.09), respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles for combination therapy were comparable to those published for each drug. There was no association between potential biomarkers and treatment outcomes. Conclusion Galunisertib 150 mg two times per day co-administered with durvalumab 1500 mg Q4W was tolerable. Clinical activity was limited. Studying this combination in patients in an earlier line of treatment or selected for predictive biomarkers of TGFβ inhibition might be a more suitable approach. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02734160.