Pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC) is an uncommon neoplasm of the lung and the main salivary gland-type lung carcinoma. The aims of this study were to review the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of PMEC and characterize the genetic events in PMEC. We reviewed the pathology cases in our hospital and found 34 initially diagnosed PMEC cases, 26 of which were confirmed as PMEC after excluding 8 cases of MEC-like pulmonary carcinoma. The clinicopathological characteristics of the 26 PMEC cases and the 8 cases of MEC-like pulmonary carcinoma were retrospectively reviewed. MAML2 rearrangement was detected by fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH). Immunostains of ALK, calponin, collagen IV, CK7, EGFR, HER2, Ki-67, Muc5Ac, p63, p40, and TTF-1 were performed. DNA was extracted from 23 cases of PMEC. Mutation profiling of the EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK, PIK3CA, PDGFRA, and DDR2 genes were carried out using next-generation sequencing (NGS), Sanger sequencing, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) in 9 successfully amplified cases. Twenty-six cases of PMEC (18 low-grade, 8 high-grade) included 13 men and 13 women aged 12–79 years. Twenty-two cases had a central/endobronchial growth pattern, and 4 cases had a peribronchial growth pattern. Immunohistochemically, CK7, Muc5Ac, p40, and p63 were positive in all cases (26/26);EGFR was positive in 11 cases (11/26); TTF-1, Calponin, HER2 and ALK were negative in all cases (0/26). MAML2 rearrangement was identified in 12 of 18 PMEC cases. No mutations were detected in any of the 7 genes in the 9 cases that qualified for mutation analysis. Twenty-three PMEC patients had follow-up information with a median interval of 32.6 months. Both the 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (OS) were 72.1%, and a high-grade tumor was an adverse prognostic factor in PMEC. There were 8 cases of MEC-like pulmonary carcinoma aged 36–78 years: 2 cases were located in the bronchus, and 6 cases were located in the lung. p63 and TTF-1 were positive in all cases (8/8), p40 was positive in 5 cases (5/8), and ALK was positive in 5 cases (5/8). No cases of MAML2 rearrangement were detected, but there were 5 cases of ALK rearrangement. PMEC is a primary malignant pulmonary tumor with a relatively good prognosis that is historically characterized by the presence of mucous cells and a lack of keratinization. There are distinct differences between PMEC and MEC-like pulmonary carcinoma in tumor location preference, immunophenotype, and molecular genetics, and the differential diagnosis is critical due to the therapeutic and prognostic considerations.

The significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma The significance of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma

Background: Although microsatellite instability (MSI) is most commonly detected in colorectal cancer (CRC), improvement in MSI analysis method can always help us better assessing MSI phenotypes and gaining useful information in challenging cases. The purpose of current study is to explore whether the ProDx® MSI analysis System (ProDx® MSI) can improve MSI classification in CRC. Methods: We compared the MSI profiles of 97 FFPE samples from CRC patients by ProDx® MSI with Promega MSI analysis System 1.2 and NCI panel. The result is then confirmed by IHC test, which evaluate MMR protein expression. Furthermore, next generation sequencing was performed to double confirm the specimens with discordant results. Results: Among the total 97 CRC cases, 35 were scored as MSI-High by ProDx® MSI, Promega MSI analysis System 1.2, and NCI panel simultaneously. Three extra MSI-High cases were identified by ProDx® MSI. These three cases were classified as MSI-Low by NCI panel, while two of these as MSI-Low, and 1 as MSS by Promega MSI analysis System 1.2. ProDx® MSI had higher concordance with IHC detection compared with Promega MSI Analysis System 1.2 and NCI panel at 99.0%, 96.9%, and 95.9%, respectively. The ProDx® MSI distinguished MSI status with 100% sensitivity and 98.4% specificity. Our data showed that MSI-High phenotype occurred most frequently in tumor development stage I and stage II. Conclusions: The colorectal cancer can be classified according to MSI status accurately by ProDx® MSI. More cases with MSI-High feature may be revealed by ProDx® MSI than by previous test systems in colorectal cancer.

Background and Aim: Poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been observed in most triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases (around 80%). Our aim was to investigate the status of mismatch repair (MMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) in TNBC. Methods: A total of 74 TNBC samples were retrospectively analyzed. MMR and MSI were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Promega 1.2 and NCI panels, respectively. PD-L1, LAG-3, and CD8 expression was assessed by IHC. Results: None of the cases demonstrated deficient MMR (dMMR) or MSI. In total, 43/74 cases (58.1%) were PD-L1+, including 1 tumor PD-L1+, 25 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) PD-L1+, and 17 cases involving concurrence of tumor and TIL PD-L1+. The rate of TIL PD-L1+ was remarkably higher than that of tumor PD-L1+ (P<0.001). We identified 20 LAG-3+ cases (27.0%, 20/74), all of which were PD-L1+. Co-expression of PD-L1 and LAG-3 was noted in 46.5% (20/43) of the PD-L1+ population. In the LAG-3+ subtype (co-expression of PD-L1 and LAG-3), high correlation between TILs PD-L1+ and LAG-3+ was observed (P<0.01). A high frequency of CD8+ (98.6%, 73/74) was observed. Conclusion: dMMR/MSI characteristics may not be a practical predictive marker for ICIs in TNBC. PD-L1+ is more common in TILs than in tumors. In the PD-L1+ population, approximately half of the cases showed LAG-3 co-expression. For patients with a poor response to PD-1(L1) mono ICI, dual blockade of PD-1(L1) and LAG-3 may be a viable option for the management of TNBC.

Background c‐ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement presents one of the newest molecular targets in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ROS1 rearrangement is predominantly found in adenocarcinoma cases and is exclusive to other oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ROS1‐rearranged patients with lung adenocarcinoma without EGFR and KRAS mutations and ALK rearrangements. Methods Wild‐type EGFR/KRAS/ALK patients with lung adenocarcinoma were selected from Beijing Chest Hospital. Specimens were conducted in tissue microarrays. ROS1 rearrangement was screened using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results Our study included 127 patients with lung adenocarcinoma without EGFR and KRAS mutations and ALK rearrangements. ROS1 rearrangement was detected in five (3.9%) of the 127 patients. Compared with ROS1‐negative patients, the positive rate of ROS1 in female patients was significantly higher than in male patients (9.8% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.009). There were no differences in age, smoking status, stage or histological subtype between ROS1‐positive and ROS1‐negative patients. No significant difference in survival was detected between the ROS1‐positive and ROS1‐negative patients. Conclusions ROS1 rearrangement is a rare subset of lung adenocarcinoma. In 127 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, 3.9% of ROS1‐positive patients with wild‐type EGFR/KRAS/ALK were found.

Objective A standardized procedure of fused REarranged during Transfection (RET) gene detection using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) remains to be established in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Our purpose was to investigate false-negative and false-positive events and their FISH signal characteristics. Methods A total of 111 PTC cases were analyzed using break-apart FISH probes for RET status evaluation. All FISH results were validated using fusion-induced asymmetric transcription assay (FIATA)-based reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). Then, suspected RET-positive cases were tested using quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for recognizing fusion variants. Results Thirty RET+ cases were revealed, including 20 CCDC6 (exon 1)-RET (exon 12), 6 NCOA4 (exon 8)-RET (exon 12), 1 NCOA4 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12), 1 CCDC186 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12), 1 ERC1 (exon 12)-RET (exon 12) and 1 SPECC1L (exon 9)-RET (exon 12) tumors. All RET fusion cases occurred in the BRAF- population, with a prevalence of 41.7% (30/72). Four cases of 8% to 13% (cutoff was 7.6%) dominant isolated 3′ green (IG) FISH signals were RET-. One FISH- case with isolated 5′ red (IR) signals with 94% abnormal tumor cells was demonstrated to be positive, harboring the NCOA4 (exon 7)-RET (exon 12) variant. Compared with RET fusions characterized by dominant break-apart signals with 29% to 100% aberrant cells, RET + with dominant IG-signal patterns all showed more frequent FISH+ cells (84%-92%). RET+ PTC with a break-apart signal pattern was more frequently found in unifocal lesions than in multifocal/bilateral tumors (P = 0.049). Conclusions A false-positive or false-negative event may exist for RET status detection in PTCs using the traditional FISH scoring method with break-apart probes.