With aquifers around the world stressed by over‐extraction, water managers are increasingly turning to managed aquifer recharge (MAR), directly replenishing groundwater resources through injection wells, recharge basins, or other approaches. While there has been progress in understanding the geological and infrastructure‐related considerations to make MAR more effective, critical evaluations of its institutional design and implementation are limited. This study assesses MAR projects, using a case study of projects proposed by groundwater sustainability agencies (GSAs) in California to comply with the state's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act of 2014; these projects will almost double the number of MAR projects in the United States. We draw on content analysis of groundwater sustainability plans that propose these projects. We first assess the types of recharge projects proposed and the stated aims of the projects, to assess when and why agencies are turning to MAR as a solution. We find that recharge basins are by far the most common approach, and that GSAs hope these basins will improve water table levels, reduce subsidence, and improve water quality. We then analyze potential barriers to project implementation and assess the projects' ability to achieve the stated goals. Primary concerns identified include a potential lack of available water, a potentially challenging legal framework, and minimal consideration of funding and cumulative land needs. To conclude, we discuss broader considerations for ensuring that MAR is an effective water management tool.

A Kohn–Sham (KS) inversion determines a KS potential and orbitals corresponding to a given electron density, a procedure that has applications in developing and evaluating functionals used in density functional theory. Despite the utility of KS inversions, application of these methods among the research community is disproportionately small. We implement the KS inversion methods of Zhao–Morrison–Parr and Wu–Yang in a framework that simplifies analysis and conversion of the resulting potential in real-space. Fully documented Python scripts integrate with PySCF, a popular electronic structure prediction software, and Fortran alternatives are provided for computational hot spots.

In marked contrast to the single, narrow ²⁹Si MAS NMR resonance for pure forsterite (Mg₂SiO₄), the spectra for synthetic forsterite containing 0.05 to 5% of the Mg²⁺ replaced with Ni²⁺, Co²⁺, or Fe²⁺ display between 4 and 26 additional, small, paramagnetically shifted peaks that are caused by interactions of the unpaired electron spins on the transition metal cations and the nuclear spins. Analyses of these relative peak areas, their numbers, and comparison of their positions to those in spectra of synthetic monticellites (CaMgSiO₄) containing similar levels of transition metals, allows at least partial assignment to the effects of cations in either the M1 octahedral site only or to both M1 and M2 sites. More detailed analyses indicate that in forsterite, Ni²⁺ occupies only M1, Fe²⁺ occupies M1 and M2 roughly equally, and Co²⁺ occupies both M1 and M2 in an approximately 3:1 ratio. These findings for low concentrations agree with expectations from previous studies by other methods (e.g., XRD) of olivines with much higher transition metal cation contents. However, even low concentrations of Mn²⁺ (e.g., 0.1%), as well as higher Fe²⁺ contents (e.g., in natural San Carlos olivine) can broaden NMR peaks sufficiently to greatly reduce this kind of information content in spectra.