Christian Makary

Christian Makary


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Implant Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
ARAlberto Md Rebaudi
Alberto Md Rebaudi
GSGilberto Md Sammartino
Gilberto Md Sammartino
NNNada Naaman
Nada Naaman
Objective: To determine if resonance frequency analysis (RFA) correlated with insertion torque (IT), bone volume (BV), and clinical osseointegration at 6 weeks. Materials and Methods: For 18 patients, BV was evaluated histologically by retrieving bone core biopsies before placement of 40 dental implants. Peak IT was recorded at implant placement, and RFA values (implant stability quotient [ISQ]) were noted at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks. Osseointegration was evaluated at 6 weeks when torquing abutments to 30 N. ISQ values were correlated with IT, BV and abutment torquing results. Data were statistically analyzed. Results: ISQ values significantly decreased at 3 weeks and increased at 6 weeks. There was a significant positive correlation between BV and ISQ at baseline and at 3 weeks, but not at 6 weeks, and between ISQ and jaw location, implant diameter and IT at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks. There was a significant correlation between spinning/painful implants during abutment torquing and low ISQ, low BV, and low IT values. Conclusion: Correlations between BV and IT values, and ISQ suggest that RFA may indicate primary implant stability. BV, IT, and ISQ values may anticipate the degree of osseointegration at 6 weeks.

27 July 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
AMabdallah menhall
abdallah menhall
CZCarole Zammarie
Carole Zammarie
Teresa LombardiTeresa Lombardi
Teresa Lombardi
SLSeung Yeup Lee
Seung Yeup Lee
KPKwang-Bum Park
Kwang-Bum Park
Background: Macro- and micro-geometry are among the factors influencing implant stability and potentially determining loading protocol. The purpose of this study was to test a protocol for early loading by controlling implant stability with the selection of fixtures with different thread depth according to the bone density of the implant site. Materials and Methods: Patients needing implant therapy for fixed prosthetic rehabilitation were treated by inserting fixtures with four different thread diameters, selected based on clinical assessment of bone quality at placement (D1, D2, D3, and D4, according to Misch classification). Final insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were recorded at baseline and ISQ measurements repeated after one, two, three, and four weeks. At the three-week measurement (four weeks after implant replacement), implants with ISQ > 70 Ncm were functionally loaded with provisional restorations. Marginal bone level was radiographically measured 12 months after implant insertion. Results: Fourteen patients were treated with the insertion of forty implants: Among them, 39 implants showing ISQ > 70 after 3 weeks of healing were loaded with provisional restoration. Mean IT value was 82.3 ± 33.2 Ncm and varied between the four different types of bone (107.2 ± 35.6 Ncm, 74.7 ± 14.0 Ncm, 76.5 ± 31.1 Ncm, and 55.2 ± 22.6 Ncm in D1, D2, D3, and D4 bone, respectively). Results showed significant differences except between D2 and D3 bone types. Mean ISQ at baseline was 79.3 ± 4.3 and values in D1, D2, D3, and D4 bone were 81.9 ± 2.0, 81.1 ± 1.0, 78.3 ± 3.7, and 73.2 ± 4.9, respectively. Results showed significant differences except between D1 and D2 bone types. IT and ISQ showed a significant positive correlation when analyzing the entire sample (p = 0.0002) and D4 bone type (p = 0.0008). The correlation between IT and ISQ was not significant when considering D1, D2, and D3 types (p = 0.28; p = 0.31; p = 0.16, respectively). ISQ values showed a slight drop at three weeks for D1, D2, and D3 bone while remaining almost unchanged in D4 bone. At 12-month follow-up, all implants (39 early loading, 1 conventional loading) had satisfactory function, showing an average marginal bone loss of 0.12 ± 0.12 mm, when compared to baseline levels. Conclusion: Matching implant macro-geometry to bone density can lead to adequate implant stability both in hard and soft bone. High primary stability and limited implant stability loss during the first month of healing could allow the application of early loading protocols with predictable clinical outcomes.

1 June 2011 in Implant Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
ARAlberto Rebaudi
Alberto Rebaudi
NMNadim Mokbel
Nadim Mokbel
NNNada Naaman
Nada Naaman
: Establish a correlation between dental implant insertion torque (IT) and bone density. : In 18 patients, implant site preparation was initiated using a trephine drill to retrieve a bone biopsy and completed with standard drills. Bone type was assessed during drilling according to surgeon's tactile sense. Forty implants were placed and peak IT values were recorded. Osseointegration was evaluated clinically at abutment connection. Data were analyzed using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. : All implants but one achieved osseointegration. D1 and D4 bone types were significantly assessed using tactile sense. IT values ranged from 15 to 150 Ncm with a mean value of 78.30 Ncm. Mean IT was significantly higher in D1 bone (126.67 Ncm) and lower in D4 bone (40.22 Ncm) (P value <0.0001), whereas intermediate values were noted in D2 and D3 bone with no significant difference between these bone types (P value = 0.462). Statistically significant correlation was found between bone volume and IT values (r = +0.771, P < 0.0001). No statistically significant correlation was found between implant length and/or diameter and IT in all bone densities. : Clinical assessment of bone density during drilling may be achieved in hard and soft bone but not in intermediate densities. Increasing peak IT values correlated with increasing bone volume. High IT does not seem to alter osseointegration process.

14 May 2024 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
AMAbdallah Menhall
Abdallah Menhall
PLPierre Lahoud
Pierre Lahoud
KYKyung Ran Yang
Kyung Ran Yang
KPKwang-Bum Park
Kwang-Bum Park
Tonino TrainiTonino Traini
Tonino Traini
Titanium implants undergo an aging process through surface hydrocarbon deposition, resulting in decreased wettability and bioactivity. Plasma treatment was shown to significantly reduce surface hydrocarbons, thus improving implant hydrophilicity and enhancing the osseointegration process. This study investigates the effect of plasma surface treatment on bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of implants presenting a nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface (XPEED®). Following a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design, patients undergoing implant surgery in the posterior maxilla received additional plasma-treated (n = 7) or -untreated (n = 5) 3.5 × 8 mm implants that were retrieved after a 4-week healing period for histological examination. Histomorphometric analysis showed that plasma-treated implants exhibited a 38.7% BIC rate compared to 22.4% of untreated implants (p = 0.002), indicating enhanced osseointegration potential. Histological images also revealed increased bone formation and active osteoblastic activity around plasma-treated implants when compared to untreated specimens. The findings suggest that plasma treatment improves surface hydrophilicity and biological response, facilitating early bone formation around titanium implants. This study underscores the importance of surface modifications in optimizing implant integration and supports the use of plasma treatment to enhance osseointegration, thereby improving clinical outcomes in implant dentistry and offering benefits for immediate and early loading protocols, particularly in soft bone conditions.

16 January 2023 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
AMAbdallah Menhall
Abdallah Menhall
PLPierre Lahoud
Pierre Lahoud
HAHyunwook An
Hyunwook An
KPKwang-Bum Park
Kwang-Bum Park
Tonino TrainiTonino Traini
Tonino Traini
Background: Implant surface topography is a key element in achieving osseointegration. Nanostructured surfaces have shown promising results in accelerating and improving bone healing around dental implants. The main objective of the present clinical and histological study is to compare, at 4 and 6 weeks, (w) bone-to-implant contact in implants having either machined surface (MAC), sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched implant surface (SLA) medium roughness surface or a nanostructured calcium-incorporated surface (XPEED®). Methods: 35 mini-implants of 3.5 × 8.5 mm with three different surface treatments (XPEED® (n = 16)—SLA (n = 13)—MAC (n = 6), were placed in the posterior maxilla of 11 patients (6 females and 5 males) then, retrieved at either 4 or 6w in a randomized split-mouth study design. Results: The BIC rates measured at 4w and 6w respectively, were: 16.8% (±5.0) and 29.0% (±3.1) for MAC surface; 18.5% (±2.3) and 33.7% (±3.3) for SLA surface; 22.4% (±1.3) and 38.6% (±3.2) for XPEED® surface. In all types of investigated surfaces, the time factor appeared to significantly increase the bone to implant contact (BIC) rate (p < 0.05). XPEED® surface showed significantly higher BIC values when compared to both SLA and MAC values at 4w (p < 0.05). Also, at 6w, both roughened surfaces (SLA and XPEED®) showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) than turned surface (MAC). Conclusions: Nanostructured Calcium titanate coating is able to enhance bone deposition around implants at early healing stages.

1 August 2017 in Implant Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMChristian Makary
Christian Makary
ARAlberto Rebaudi
Alberto Rebaudi
ADArzu Demircioglu
Arzu Demircioglu
PLPierre Lahoud
Pierre Lahoud
NNNada Naaman
Nada Naaman
Clinically evaluate implants placed after ultrasonic implant site preparation (UISP) and standard drilling (SD). Ten patients received 21 implants placed using UISP (n = 11) or SD (n = 10). Bone quality was hand assessed and final insertion torque (IT), resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) at baseline and ISQ, and removal torque values (RTV) at 4 weeks were recorded and compared. Mean IT values were 70.91 and 72.40 N/cm in UISP and SD groups, respectively, and were not statistically different. IT significantly correlated to bone quality. Mean ISQ values at baseline and 4 weeks were not significantly different and were 74.72 and 74.73 for UISP and 76.70 and 73.20 for SD, respectively. Mean ISQ at baseline significantly correlated to IT values and bone quality in both groups. Mean RTV values in both UISP (51.32 N/cm) and SD (53.1 N/cm) were not significantly different but significantly correlated to IT values. All implants achieved osseointegration and were restored. Implant placement after ultrasonic preparation can be considered a predictable technique leading to clinical and biological responses similar to SD 4 weeks after insertion.