The New Zealand Community Fault Model (NZ CFM) is a publicly available representation of New Zealand fault zones that have the potential to produce damaging earthquakes. Compiled through collaborative engagement between New Zealand earthquake‐science experts, this first edition (version 1.0) of the NZ CFM builds upon previous compilations of earthquake‐source active fault models with the addition of new and modified information. Developed primarily to support an update of the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model, the NZ CFM comprises two principal components. The first dataset is a two‐dimensional map representation of the surface traces of 880 generalised fault zones. Each fault zone is assigned specific geometric and kinematic attributes, including uncertainties, supplemented with a subjective quality ranking focused primarily on the confidence in assigned slip rates. The second component is a three‐dimensional representation of the fault zones as triangulated mesh surfaces that are projected down‐dip from the two‐dimensional mapped traces to a geophysically‐defined maximum fault rupture depth. This article summarises the compilation and parameterisation of the NZ CFM, along with background on its relation to predecessor datasets, and forward applications to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment and physics‐based earthquake models currently being developed for Aotearoa New Zealand.

Two‐ and three‐dimensional numerical modelling techniques, constrained by key geodynamic data, provide insights into the controls on development of porphyry‐related Cu–Au mineralisation in the Tertiary collision zone of New Guinea. Modelling shows that the creation of local dilation to facilitate magma emplacement can be caused by reactivation of arc‐normal transfer faults, where they cut the weakened fold belt. Additionally, dilation occurs where fluid overpressuring is caused by collision‐related, south‐directed fluid flow being localised into the more permeable units of the Mesozoic passive‐margin sedimentary succession. Rapid uplift and erosion, which may be a mechanism for magmatic fluid release in these systems, is shown to be greatest in the west of West Papua, where the stronger Australian crust acts as a buttress. Within the Papuan Fold Belt, uplift is greatest near the margins, where the weaker fold belt abuts the stronger crust and/or major faults have been reactivated. Increased orographically induced precipitation and erosion exposes the lower parts of the stratigraphy within or on the margins of these uplifted zones. On a smaller scale, 2–D coupled fluid‐flow ‐ thermal‐chemical modelling uses a scenario of fluid mixing to calculate metal precipitation distribution and magnitude around an individual intrusive complex. Modelling highlights the interdependence of the spatial permeability structure, the regional temperature gradient, and the geometry of the convection cells and how this impacts on the distribution of metal precipitation.