Background: The prevalence of venous thromboembolic event (VTE) and arterial thromboembolic event (ATE) thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 remains largely unknown.Methods: In this meta-analysis, we systematically searched for observational studies describing the prevalence of VTE and ATE in COVID-19 up to 30 September 2020.Results: We analysed findings from 102 studies (64 503 patients). The frequency of COVID-19-related VTE was 14.7% (95% CI 12.1% to 17.6%, I²=94%; 56 studies; 16 507 patients). The overall prevalence rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and leg deep vein thrombosis were 7.8% (95% CI 6.2% to 9.4%, I²=94%; 66 studies; 23 117 patients) and 11.2% (95% CI 8.4% to 14.3%, I²=95%; 48 studies; 13 824 patients), respectively. Few were isolated subsegmental PE. The VTE prevalence was significantly higher in intensive care unit (ICU) (23.2%, 95% CI 17.5% to 29.6%, I²=92%, vs 9.0%, 95% CI 6.9% to 11.4%, I²=95%; p_interaction<0.0001) and in series systematically screening patients compared with series testing symptomatic patients (25.2% vs 12.7%, p_interaction=0.04). The frequency rates of overall ATE, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and other ATE were 3.9% (95% CI 2.0% to to 3.0%, I²=96%; 16 studies; 7939 patients), 1.6% (95% CI 1.0% to 2.2%, I²=93%; 27 studies; 40 597 patients) and 0.9% (95% CI 0.5% to 1.5%, I²=84%; 17 studies; 20 139 patients), respectively. Metaregression and subgroup analyses failed to explain heterogeneity of overall ATE. High heterogeneity limited the value of estimates.Conclusions: Patients admitted in the ICU for severe COVID-19 had a high risk of VTE. Conversely, further studies are needed to determine the specific effects of COVID-19 on the risk of ATE or VTE in less severe forms of the disease.

Objectives: To describe the characteristics, treatment and outcome of patients with immune thrombocytopenia with clinical significance (ITPCS) associated with SLE. Methods: This retrospective multicentre study included SLE patients who experienced ≥1 ITPCS (defined as ITP with attributable bleeding disorders and/or a platelet count 8 and/or WHO score >2. Results: A total of 90 patients were included, the median (range) follow-up duration was 80 (6–446) months. ITP was diagnosed before SLE in 25 patients. They presented a high rate of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (15%), antiphospholipid antibody (62%) and antiphospholipid syndrome (19%). The 25 (28%) patients who experienced MBG had significantly more bleedings at ITP diagnosis and higher bleeding scores, and serositis and thrombosis during follow-up. They required significantly more treatment lines, transfusions and hospitalizations. The 11 (12%) patients who experienced no bleeding event presented a significantly more restricted SLE phenotype (cutaneous and/or articular). Patients received a mean (range) of 4.2 (1–11) treatment lines. Corticosteroids and HCQ allowed ITPCS overall response in one-third of patients. The median relapse-free survival of rituximab (n = 34), AZA (n = 19), MMF (n = 8), thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (n = 16) and splenectomy (n = 19) were 53, 31.5, 61, 24.5 and 78 months, respectively. Four patients experienced thrombotic events after splenectomy and one occurred under thrombopoietin-receptor agonist treatment. Conclusion: SLE-ITCS patients displayed a high rate of haematological abnormalities and MBG patients exhibited higher morbidity. Management of thrombocytopenia was highly heterogeneous and many options seem viable.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICU) is frequent, but risk factors (RF) remain unidentified. In this meta-analysis (CRD42020188764) we searched for observational studies from ICUs reporting the association between VTE and RF in Medline/Embase up to 15 April 2021. Reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Analyses were conducted using the random-effects model and produced a non-adjusted odds ratio (OR). We analysed 83 RF from 21 studies (5296 patients). We found moderate-certainty evidence for an association between VTE and the D-dimer peak (OR 5.83, 95%CI 3.18–10.70), and length of hospitalization (OR 7.09, 95%CI 3.41–14.73) and intubation (OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.94–3.51). We identified low-certainty evidence for an association between VTE and CRP (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.32–2.53), D-dimer (OR 4.58, 95% CI 2.52–8.50), troponin T (OR 8.64, 95% CI 3.25–22.97), and the requirement for inotropic drugs (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.15–2.43). Traditional VTE RF (i.e., history of cancer, previous VTE events, obesity) were not found to be associated to VTE in COVID-19. Anticoagulation was not associated with a decreased VTE risk. VTE RF in severe COVID-19 correspond to individual illness severity, and inflammatory and coagulation parameters.

The treatment of autoimmune acquired pure red cell aplasia (aPRCA) is challenging. Guidelines are based on expert recommendations in the absence of controlled trials. We assessed the efficacy of the main treatment strategy through a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2022. The overall response rate (ORR) was pooled using random-effects models. In total, 24 observational studies (19 retrospective, median follow-up of 48 months) encompassing 753 patients (49% male) were included. Primary aPRCA represented 57% of the cases. The risk of bias was moderate to high using the ROBINS-I tool. Substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) was retrieved. Corticosteroids as monotherapy as first-line treatment (186 patients, 13 studies) provided an ORR of 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34-60). Cyclosporine A was the most frequently used immunosuppressant agent (384 patients, 18 studies), providing an ORR of 74% (95% CI, 66-82) with a similar ORR in first- (73%) and second-line (76%) treatment and when cyclosporin was used as monotherapy (83%) or with corticosteroids (77%). A total of 112 patients (10 studies) received cyclophosphamide, with an ORR of 49% (95% CI, 35-64), which was higher when cyclophosphamide was combined with corticosteroids (48%) and used in second-line treatment (58%) than in monotherapy (31%), and in first-line treatment (44%). Sirolimus use was reported only after cyclosporine A failure and provided an ORR of 87% (95% CI, 68-100; 64 patients, 3 studies). Substantial uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment strategy in the absence of high-quality evidence. This study was registered on the PROPERO database as #CRD42022360452.