Roberto Bianco

Prof. Roberto Bianco

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2015 in Cancer Treatment Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VDValentina D’amato
Valentina D’amato
LRLucia Raimondo
Lucia Raimondo
LFLuigi Formisano
Luigi Formisano
MGMario Giuliano
Mario Giuliano
SPSabino De Placido
Sabino De Placido
Roberto BiancoRoberto Bianco
Roberto Bianco

1 July 2007 in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Roberto BiancoRoberto Bianco
Roberto Bianco
TGTeresa Gelardi
Teresa Gelardi
VDVincenzo Damiano
Vincenzo Damiano
Fortunato CiardielloFortunato Ciardiello
Fortunato Ciardiello
Giampaolo TortoraGiampaolo Tortora
Giampaolo Tortora

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPaola Ciciola
Paola Ciciola
PCPriscilla Cascetta
Priscilla Cascetta
CBCataldo Bianco
Cataldo Bianco
LFLuigi Formisano
Luigi Formisano
Roberto BiancoRoberto Bianco
Roberto Bianco
Immunotherapy has recently emerged as a novel strategy for treating different types of solid tumors, with promising results. However, still a large fraction of patients do not primarily respond to such approaches, and even responders sooner or later develop resistance. Moreover, immunotherapy is a promising strategy for certain malignancies but not for others, with this discrepancy having been attributed to a more immunogenic microenvironment of some tumors. As abnormal and augmented tumor vessels often occur in cancerogenesis, anti-angiogenic drugs have already demonstrated their effectiveness both in preclinical and in clinical settings. By targeting abnormal formation of tumor vessels, anti-angiogenetic agents potentially result in an enhanced infiltration of immune effector cells. Moreover, crosstalks downstream of the immune checkpoint axis and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) signaling may result in synergistic effects of combined treatment in tumor cells. In this review, we will describe and discuss the biological rationale of a combined therapy, underlying the modification in tumor microenvironment as well as in tumor cells after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors and anti-angiogenic drugs. Moreover, we will highlight this strategy as a possible way for overcoming drug resistance. By first discussing potential prognostic and predictive factors for combined treatment, we will then turn to clinical settings, focusing on clinical trials where this strategy is currently being investigated.

25 April 2017 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMConcetta Di Mauro
Concetta Di Mauro
RRRoberta Rosa
Roberta Rosa
VDValentina D'AMato
Valentina D'AMato
PCPaola Ciciola
Paola Ciciola
ASAlberto Servetto
Alberto Servetto
Roberto BiancoRoberto Bianco
Roberto Bianco
Background: Several evidences suggest a marked angiogenic dependency in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumorigenesis and a potential sensitivity to anti-angiogenic agents. Herein, the putative role of Hedgehog (Hh) pathway in regulating TNBC-dependent angiogenesis was investigated. Methods: Expression and regulation of the Hh pathway transcription factor glioma-associated oncogene homolog1 protein (GLI1) were studied on the endothelial compartment and on TNBC-initiated angiogenesis. To evaluate the translational relevance of our findings, the combination of paclitaxel with the Smo inhibitor NVP-LDE225 was tested in TNBC xenografted mice. Results: Tissue microarray analysis on 200 TNBC patients showed GLI1 overexpression paired with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) expression. In vitro, Hh pathway promotes TNBC progression in an autocrine manner, regulating the VEGF/VEGFR2 loop on cancer cell surface, and in a paracrine manner, orchestrating tumour vascularisation. These effects were counteracted by Smo pharmacological inhibition. In TNBC xenografted mice, scheduling NVP-LDE225 rather than bevacizumab provided a better sustained inhibition of TNBC cells proliferation and endothelial cells organisation. Conclusions: This study identifies the Hh pathway as one of the main regulators of tumour angiogenesis in TNBC, thus suggesting Hh inhibition as a potential new anti-angiogenic therapeutic option to be clinically investigated in GLI1 overexpressing TNBC patients.

13 May 2014 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VDV D'Amato
V D'Amato
RRR Rosa
R Rosa
CDC D'Amato
C D'Amato
LFLuigi Formisano
Luigi Formisano
RMR Marciano
R Marciano
Roberto BiancoRoberto Bianco
Roberto Bianco
Cetuximab is the only targeted agent approved for the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), but low response rates and disease progression are frequently reported. As the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways have an important role in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, we investigated their involvement in cetuximab resistance. Different human squamous cancer cell lines sensitive or resistant to cetuximab were tested for the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PF-05212384 (PKI-587), alone and in combination, both in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with PKI-587 enhances sensitivity to cetuximab in vitro, even in the condition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance. The combination of the two drugs inhibits cells survival, impairs the activation of signalling pathways and induces apoptosis. Interestingly, although significant inhibition of proliferation is observed in all cell lines treated with PKI-587 in combination with cetuximab, activation of apoptosis is evident in sensitive but not in resistant cell lines, in which autophagy is pre-eminent. In nude mice xenografted with resistant Kyse30 cells, the combined treatment significantly reduces tumour growth and prolongs mice survival. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition has an important role in the rescue of cetuximab resistance. Different mechanisms of cell death are induced by combined treatment depending on basal anti-EGFR responsiveness.

4 November 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPriscilla Cascetta
Priscilla Cascetta
AMArianna Marinello
Arianna Marinello
CLChiara Lazzari
Chiara Lazzari
VGVanesa Gregorc
Vanesa Gregorc
DPDavid Planchard
David Planchard
Alessandro MorabitoAlessandro Morabito
Alessandro Morabito
In NSCLC, KRAS mutations occur in up to 30% of all cases, most frequently at codon 12 and 13. KRAS mutations have been linked to adenocarcinoma histology, positive smoking history, and Caucasian ethnicity, although differences have been described across KRAS mutational variants subtypes. KRAS mutations often concur with other molecular alterations, notably TP53, STK11, and KEAP1, which could play an important role in treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. For many years, KRAS mutations have been considered undruggable mainly due to a high toxicity profile and low specificity of compounds. Sotorasib and adagrasib are novel KRAS inhibitors that recently gained FDA approval for pre-treated KRAS mutant NSCLC patients, and other molecules such as GDC-6036 are currently being investigated with promising results. Despite their approval, the efficacy of these drugs is lower than expected and progression among responders has been reported. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to anti-KRAS molecules typically involves either on target secondary mutations (e.g., G12, G13, Q61H, R68S, H95, Y96C, V8L) or off-target alterations. Ongoing trials are currently evaluating strategies for implementing efficacy and overcoming acquired resistance to these compounds. Finally, the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors still needs to be completely assessed and responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents may strongly depend on concomitant mutations.