Emilia Wiechec

Dr. Emilia Wiechec

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (BKV), Linköpings Universitet, Linkoping, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 June 2009 in Journal of Medical Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Saeid GhavamiSaeid Ghavami
Saeid Ghavami
MHMohammad Hashemi
Mohammad Hashemi
SASudharsana Rao Ande
Sudharsana Rao Ande
BYB Yeganeh
B Yeganeh
WXW Xiao
W Xiao
Marek J. ŁosMarek J. Łos
Marek J. Łos
The inactivation of programmed cell death has profound effects not only on the development but also on the overall integrity of multicellular organisms. Beside developmental abnormalities, it may lead to tumorigenesis, autoimmunity, and other serious health problems. Deregulated apoptosis may also be the leading cause of cancer therapy chemoresistance. Caspase family of cysteinyl-proteases plays the key role in the initiation and execution of programmed cell death. This review gives an overview of the role of caspases, their natural modulators like IAPs, FLIPs, and Smac/Diablo in apoptosis and upon inactivation, and also in cancer development. Besides describing the basic mechanisms governing programmed cell death, a large part of this review is dedicated to previous studies that were focused on screening tumours for mutations within caspase genes as well as their regulators. The last part of this review discusses several emerging treatments that involve modulation of caspases and their regulators. Thus, we also highlight caspase cascade modulating experimental anticancer drugs like cFLIP-antagonist CDDO-Me; cIAP1 antagonists OSU-03012 and ME-BS; and XIAP small molecule antagonists 1396–11, 1396–12, 1396–28, triptolide, AEG35156, survivin/Hsp90 antagonist shephedrin, and some of the direct activators of procaspase-3.

1 February 2007 in Drug Resistance Updates
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SMS Maddika
S Maddika
SAS Ande
S Ande
SPS Panigrahi
S Panigrahi
TPT Paranjothy
T Paranjothy
KWK Weglarczyk
K Weglarczyk
Marek J. ŁosMarek J. Łos
Marek J. Łos

1 October 2008 in Trends in Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKThomas Klonisch
Thomas Klonisch
EWEmilia Wiechec
Emilia Wiechec
SHSabine Hombach-Klonisch
Sabine Hombach-Klonisch
SASudharsana Rao Ande
Sudharsana Rao Ande
Sebastian WesselborgSebastian Wesselborg
Sebastian Wesselborg
Marek J. ŁosMarek J. Łos
Marek J. Łos

14 January 2019 in Cancer Cell International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMStyliani Melissaridou
Styliani Melissaridou
EWEmilia Wiechec
Emilia Wiechec
MMMustafa Magan
Mustafa Magan
MJMayur Vilas Jain
Mayur Vilas Jain
MCManki Chung
Manki Chung
Karin RobergKarin Roberg
Karin Roberg
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors are often resistant to therapies. Therefore searching for predictive markers and new targets for treatment in clinically relevant in vitro tumor models is essential. Five HNSCC-derived cell lines were used to assess the effect of 3D culturing compared to 2D monolayers in terms of cell proliferation, response to anti-cancer therapy as well as expression of EMT and CSC genes. The viability and proliferation capacity of HNSCC cells as well as induction of apoptosis in tumor spheroids cells after treatment was assessed by MTT assay, crystal violet- and TUNEL assay respectively. Expression of EMT and CSC markers was analyzed on mRNA (RT-qPCR) and protein (Western blot) level. We showed that HNSCC cells from different tumors formed spheroids that differed in size and density in regard to EMT-associated protein expression and culturing time. In all spheroids, an up regulation of CDH1, NANOG and SOX2 was observed in comparison to 2D but changes in the expression of EGFR and EMT markers varied among the cell lines. Moreover, most HNSCC cells grown in 3D showed decreased sensitivity to cisplatin and cetuximab (anti-EGFR) treatment. Taken together, our study points at notable differences between these two cellular systems in terms of EMT-associated gene expression profile and drug response. As the 3D cell cultures imitate the in vivo behaviour of neoplastic cells within the tumor, our study suggest that 3D culture model is superior to 2D monolayers in the search for new therapeutic targets.

1 April 2008 in Journal of Cell Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSubbareddy Maddika
Subbareddy Maddika
SASudharsana Rao Ande
Sudharsana Rao Ande
EWEmilia Wiechec
Emilia Wiechec
LHLise Lotte Hansen
Lise Lotte Hansen
Sebastian WesselborgSebastian Wesselborg
Sebastian Wesselborg
Marek J. ŁosMarek J. Łos
Marek J. Łos
Here, we show that CDK2, an S-phase cyclin-dependent kinase, is a novel target for Akt during cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Akt phosphorylates CDK2 at threonine 39 residue both in vitro and in vivo. Although CDK2 threonine 39 phosphorylation mediated by Akt enhances cyclin-A binding, it is dispensable for its basal binding and the kinase activity. In addition, for the first time, we report a transient nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling of Akt during specific stages of the cell cycle, in particular during the late S and G2 phases. The Akt that is re-localized to the nucleus phosphorylates CDK2 and causes the temporary cytoplasmic localization of the CDK2–cyclin-A complex. The CDK2 cytoplasmic redistribution is required for cell progression from S to G2-M phase, because the CDK2 T39A mutant, which lacks the phosphorylation site and is defective in cytoplasmic localization, severely affects cell cycle progression at the transition from S to G2-M. Interestingly, we also show that the Akt/CDK2 pathway is constitutively activated by some anticancer drugs, such as methotrexate and docetaxel, and under these conditions it promotes, rather than represses, cell death. Thus, the constitutive activation of the Akt/CDK2 pathway and changed subcellular localization promotes apoptosis. By contrast, the transient, physiological Akt/CDK2 activation is necessary for cell cycle progression.

15 February 2014 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFEnsieh Farahani
Ensieh Farahani
HPHirak K Patra
Hirak K Patra
JJJaganmohan R. Jangamreddy
Jaganmohan R. Jangamreddy
IRIran Rashedi
Iran Rashedi
MKMarta Kawalec
Marta Kawalec
EWEmilia Wiechec
Emilia Wiechec
Despite decades of search for anticancer drugs targeting solid tumors, this group of diseases remains largely incurable, especially if in advanced, metastatic stage. In this review, we draw comparison between reprogramming and carcinogenesis, as well as between stem cells (SCs) and cancer stem cells (CSCs), focusing on changing garniture of adhesion molecules. Furthermore, we elaborate on the role of adhesion molecules in the regulation of (cancer) SCs division (symmetric or asymmetric), and in evolving interactions between CSCs and extracellular matrix. Among other aspects, we analyze the role and changes of expression of key adhesion molecules as cancer progresses and metastases develop. Here, the role of cadherins, integrins, as well as selected transcription factors like Twist and Snail is highlighted, not only in the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition but also in the avoidance of anoikis. Finally, we briefly discuss recent developments and new strategies targeting CSCs, which focus on adhesion molecules or targeting tumor vasculature.