Zhiwei Hou

Dr. Zhiwei Hou

Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 July 2019 in Big Earth Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KSKai Sun
Kai Sun
Yunqiang ZhuYunqiang Zhu
Yunqiang Zhu
PPPeng Pan
Peng Pan
ZHZhiwei Hou
Zhiwei Hou
DWDongxu Wang
Dongxu Wang
JSJia Song
Jia Song
Effective integration and wide sharing of geospatial data is an important and basic premise to facilitate the research and applications of geographic information science. However, the semantic heterogeneity of geospatial data is a major problem that significantly hinders geospatial data integration and sharing. Ontologies are regarded as a promising way to solve semantic problems by providing a formalized representation of geographic entities and relationships between them in a manner understandable to machines. Thus, many efforts have been made to explore ontology-based geospatial data integration and sharing. However, there is a lack of a specialized ontology that would provide a unified description for geospatial data. In this paper, with a focus on the characteristics of geospatial data, we propose a unified framework for geospatial data ontology, denoted GeoDataOnt, to establish a semantic foundation for geospatial data integration and sharing. First, we provide a characteristics hierarchy of geospatial data. Next, we analyze the semantic problems for each characteristic of geospatial data. Subsequently, we propose the general framework of GeoDataOnt, targeting these problems according to the characteristics of geospatial data. GeoDataOnt is then divided into multiple modules, and we show a detailed design and implementation for each module. Key limitations and challenges of GeoDataOnt are identified, and broad applications of GeoDataOnt are discussed.

8 December 2016 in International Journal of Digital Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYunqiang Zhu
Yunqiang Zhu
AZA-Xing Zhu
A-Xing Zhu
JSJia Song
Jia Song
JYJie Yang
Jie Yang
MFMin Feng
Min Feng
HZHongwei Zhao
Hongwei Zhao
Linked Data is known as one of the best solutions for multisource and heterogeneous web data integration and discovery in this era of Big Data. However, data interlinking, which is the most valuable contribution of Linked Data, remains incomplete and inaccurate. This study proposes a multidimensional and quantitative interlinking approach for Linked Data in the geospatial domain. According to the characteristics and roles of geospatial data in data discovery, eight elementary data characteristics are adopted as data interlinking types. These elementary characteristics are further combined to form compound and overall data interlinking types. Each data interlinking type possesses one specific predicate to indicate the actual relationship of Linked Data and uses data similarity to represent the correlation degree quantitatively. Therefore, geospatial data interlinking can be expressed by a directed edge associated with a relation predicate and a similarity value. The approach transforms existing simple and qualitative geospatial data interlinking into complete and quantitative interlinking and promotes the establishment of high-quality and trusted Linked Geospatial Data. The approach is applied to build data intra-links in the Chinese National Earth System Scientific Data Sharing Network (NSTI-GEO) and data -links in NSTI-GEO with the Chinese Meteorological Data Network and National Population and Health Scientific Data Sharing Platform.

13 November 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZGZhen Gao
Zhen Gao
GTGuoqiang Tang
Guoqiang Tang
Jing WenlongJing Wenlong
Jing Wenlong
ZHZhiwei Hou
Zhiwei Hou
JYJi Yang
Ji Yang
JSJia Sun
Jia Sun
Satellite and reanalysis precipitation estimates of high quality are widely used for hydrological modeling, especially in ungauged or data-scarce regions. To improve flood simulations by merging different precipitation inputs or directly merging streamflow outputs, this study comprehensively evaluates the accuracy and hydrological utility of nine corrected and uncorrected precipitation products (TMPA-3B42V7, TMPA-3B42RT, IMERG-cal, IMERG-uncal, ERA5, ERA-Interim, GSMaP, GSMaP-RNL, and PERSIANN-CCS) from 2006 to 2018 on a daily timescale using the Coupled Routing and Excess Storage (CREST) hydrological model in two flood-prone tributaries, the Beijiang and Dongjiang Rivers, of the Pearl River Basin, China. The results indicate that (1) all the corrected precipitation products had better performance (higher CC, CSI, KGE’, and NSCE values) than the uncorrected ones, particularly in the Beijiang River, which has a larger drainage area; (2) after re-calibration under Scenario II, the two daily merged precipitation products (NSCE values: 0.73–0.87 and 0.69–0.82 over the Beijiang and Dongjiang Rivers, respectively) outperformed their original members for hydrological modeling in terms of BIAS and RMSE values; (3) in Scenario III, four evaluation metrics illustrated that merging multi-source streamflow simulations achieved better performance in streamflow simulation than merging multi-source precipitation products; and (4) under increasing flood levels, almost all the performances of streamflow simulations were reduced, and the two merging schemes had a similar performance. These findings will provide valuable information for improving flood simulations and will also be useful for further hydrometeorological applications of remote sensing data.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZhiwei Hou
Zhiwei Hou
XLXulong Liu
Xulong Liu
SZShengnan Zhou
Shengnan Zhou
Jing WenlongJing Wenlong
Jing Wenlong
JYJi Yang
Ji Yang
The geoscience knowledge graph (GeoKG) has gained worldwide attention due to its ability in the formal representation of spatiotemporal features and relationships of geoscience knowledge. Currently, a quantitative review of the state and trends in GeoKG is still scarce. Thus, a bibliometric analysis was performed in this study to fill the gap. Specifically, based on 294 research articles published from 2012 to 2023, we conducted analyses in terms of the (1) trends in publications and citations; (2) identification of the major papers, sources, researchers, institutions, and countries; (3) scientific collaboration analysis; and (4) detection of major research topics and tendencies. The results revealed that the interest in GeoKG research has rapidly increased after 2019 and is continually expanding. China is the most productive country in this field. Co-authorship analysis shows that inter-national and inter-institutional collaboration should be reinforced. Keyword analysis indicated that geoscience knowledge representation, information extraction, GeoKG construction, and GeoKG-based multi-source data integration were current hotspots. In addition, several important but currently neglected issues, such as the integration of Large Language Models, are highlighted. The findings of this review provide a systematic overview of the development of GeoKG and provide a valuable reference for future research.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZhiwei Hou
Zhiwei Hou
Cheng-Zhi QinCheng-Zhi Qin
Cheng-Zhi Qin
AZA-Xing Zhu
A-Xing Zhu
LPLiang Peng
Liang Peng
YWYi-Jie Wang
Yi-Jie Wang
Yunqiang ZhuYunqiang Zhu
Yunqiang Zhu
One of the key concerns in geographic modeling is the preparation of input data that are sufficient and appropriate for models. This requires considerable time, effort, and expertise since geographic models and their application contexts are complex and diverse. Moreover, both data and data pre-processing tools are multi-source, heterogeneous, and sometimes unavailable for a specific application context. The traditional method of manually preparing input data cannot effectively support geographic modeling, especially for complex integrated models and non-expert users. Therefore, effective methods are urgently needed that are not only able to prepare appropriate input data for models but are also easy to use. In this review paper, we first analyze the factors that influence data preparation and discuss the three corresponding key tasks that should be accomplished when developing input data preparation methods for geographic models. Then, existing input data preparation methods for geographic models are discussed through classifying into three categories: manual, (semi-)automatic, and intelligent (i.e., not only (semi-)automatic but also adaptive to application context) methods. Supported by the adoption of knowledge representation and reasoning techniques, the state-of-the-art methods in this field point to intelligent input data preparation for geographic models, which includes knowledge-supported discovery and chaining of data pre-processing functionalities, knowledge-driven (semi-)automatic workflow building (or service composition in the context of geographic web services) of data preprocessing, and artificial intelligent planning-based service composition as well as their parameter-settings. Lastly, we discuss the challenges and future research directions from the following aspects: Sharing and reusing of model data and workflows, integration of data discovery and processing functionalities, task-oriented input data preparation methods, and construction of knowledge bases for geographic modeling, all assisting with the development of an easy-to-use geographic modeling environment with intelligent input data preparation.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZhiwei Hou
Zhiwei Hou
Cheng-Zhi QinCheng-Zhi Qin
Cheng-Zhi Qin
AZA-Xing Zhu
A-Xing Zhu
YWYi-Jie Wang
Yi-Jie Wang
LPLiang Peng
Liang Peng
Yunqiang ZhuYunqiang Zhu
Yunqiang Zhu
Intelligent geoprocessing relies heavily on formalized parameter constraints of geoprocessing tools to validate the input data and to further ensure the robustness and reliability of geoprocessing. However, existing methods developed to formalize parameter constraints are either designed based on ill-suited assumptions, which may not correctly identify the invalid parameter inputs situation, or are inefficient to use. This paper proposes a novel method to formalize the parameter constraints of geoprocessing tools, based on a high-level and standard constraint language (i.e., SHACL) and geoprocessing ontologies, under the guidance of a systematic classification of parameter constraints. An application case and a heuristic evaluation were conducted to demonstrate and evaluate the effectiveness and usability of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method is not only comparatively easier and more efficient than existing methods but also covers more types of parameter constraints, for example, the application-context-matching constraints that have been ignored by existing methods.