Casper Reijnen

Mr. Casper Reijnen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
HKHeidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde
Heidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde
CPClemens F. Prinsen
Clemens F. Prinsen
LMLeon F.A.G. Massuger
Leon F.A.G. Massuger
MSMarc P.M.L. Snijders
Marc P.M.L. Snijders
JPJohanna M.A. Pijnenborg
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg

15 May 2020 in PLOS Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
EGEvangelia Gogou
Evangelia Gogou
NVNicole C. M. Visser
Nicole C. M. Visser
HEHilde Engerud
Hilde Engerud
JRJordache Ramjith
Jordache Ramjith
JPJohanna Pijnenborg
Johanna Pijnenborg
Bayesian networks (BNs) are machine-learning–based computational models that visualize causal relationships and provide insight into the processes underlying disease progression, closely resembling clinical decision-making. Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer, and although several biomarkers are related to LNM, none of them are incorporated in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate a preoperative BN to predict LNM and outcome in endometrial cancer patients. Within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), we performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study including 763 patients, median age 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58–71), surgically treated for endometrial cancer between February 1995 and August 2013 at one of the 10 participating European hospitals. A BN was developed using score-based machine learning in addition to expert knowledge. Our main outcome measures were LNM and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS). Preoperative clinical, histopathological, and molecular biomarkers were included in the network. External validation was performed using 2 prospective study cohorts: the Molecular Markers in Treatment in Endometrial Cancer (MoMaTEC) study cohort, including 446 Norwegian patients, median age 64 years (IQR 59–74), treated between May 2001 and 2010; and the PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study cohort, including 384 Dutch patients, median age 66 years (IQR 60–73), treated between September 2011 and December 2013. A BN called ENDORISK (preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer) was developed including the following predictors: preoperative tumor grade; immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), p53, and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM); cancer antigen 125 serum level; thrombocyte count; imaging results on lymphadenopathy; and cervical cytology. In the MoMaTEC cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–0.88) for LNM and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77–0.87) for 5-year DSS. In the PIPENDO cohort, the AUC for 5-year DSS was 0.84 (95% CI 0.78–0.90). The network was well-calibrated. In the MoMaTEC cohort, 249 patients (55.8%) were classified with <5% risk of LNM, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. A limitation of the study is the use of imputation to correct for missing predictor variables in the development cohort and the retrospective study design. In this study, we illustrated how BNs can be used for individualizing clinical decision-making in oncology by incorporating easily accessible and multimodal biomarkers. The network shows the complex interactions underlying the carcinogenetic process of endometrial cancer by its graphical representation. A prospective feasibility study will be needed prior to implementation in the clinic.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMiriam van der Maten
Miriam van der Maten
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
JPJohanna Pijnenborg
Johanna Pijnenborg
MZMirjam Zegers
Mirjam Zegers
L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a glycoprotein involved in cancer development and is associated with metastases and poor prognosis. Cellular processing of L1CAM results in expression of either full-length or cleaved forms of the protein. The different forms of L1CAM may localize at the plasma membrane as a transmembrane protein, or in the intra- or extracellular environment as cleaved or exosomal forms. Here, we systematically analyze available literature that directly relates to L1CAM domains and associated signaling pathways in cancer. Specifically, we chart its domain-specific functions in relation to cancer progression, and outline pre-clinical assays used to assess L1CAM. It is found that full-length L1CAM has both intracellular and extracellular targets, including interactions with integrins, and linkage with ezrin. Cellular processing leading to proteolytic cleavage and/or exosome formation results in extracellular soluble forms of L1CAM that may act through similar mechanisms as compared to full-length L1CAM, such as integrin-dependent signals, but also through distinct mechanisms. We provide an algorithm to guide a step-wise analysis on L1CAM in clinical samples, to promote interpretation of domain-specific expression. This systematic review infers that L1CAM has an important role in cancer progression that can be attributed to domain-specific forms. Most studies focus on the full-length plasma membrane L1CAM, yet knowledge on the domain-specific forms is a prerequisite for selective targeting treatment.

11 June 2019 in The Oncologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
JIJoanna IntHout
Joanna IntHout
LMLeon F.A.G. Massuger
Leon F.A.G. Massuger
FSFleur Strobbe
Fleur Strobbe
HKHeidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde
Heidi V.N. Küsters-Vandevelde
JPJohanna M.A. Pijnenborg
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg
Background. In endometrial carcinoma (EC), preoperative classification is based on histopathological criteria, with only moderate diagnostic performance for the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). So far, existing molecular classification systems have not been evaluated for prediction of LNM. Optimized use of clinical biomarkers as recommended by international guidelines might be a first step to improve tailored treatment, awaiting future molecular biomarkers. Aim. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative clinical biomarkers for the prediction of LNM in endometrial cancer. Methods. A systematic review was performed according to the Meta‐analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Studies identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE were selected by two independent reviewers. Included biomarkers were based on recommended guidelines (cancer antigen 125 [Ca‐125], lymphadenopathy on magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography [18FDG PET‐CT]) or obtained by physical examination (body mass index, cervical cytology, blood cell counts). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratios were calculated with bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis. Likelihood ratios were classified into small (0.5–1.0 or 1–2.0), moderate (0.2–0.5 or 2.0–5.0) or large (0.1–0.2 or ≥ 5.0) impact. Results. Eighty‐three studies, comprising 18,205 patients, were included. Elevated Ca‐125 and thrombocytosis were associated with a moderate increase in risk of LNM; lymphadenopathy on imaging with a large increase. Normal Ca‐125, cytology, and no lymphadenopathy on 18FDG PET‐CT were associated with a moderate decrease. AUCs were above 0.75 for these biomarkers. Other biomarkers had an AUC <0.75 and incurred only small impact. Conclusion. Ca‐125, thrombocytosis, and imaging had a large and moderate impact on risk of LNM and could improve preoperative risk stratification. Implications for Practice. Routine lymphadenectomy in clinical early‐stage endometrial carcinoma does not improve outcome and is associated with 15%–20% surgery‐related morbidity, underlining the need for improved preoperative risk stratification. New molecular classification systems are emerging but have not yet been evaluated for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. This article provides a robust overview of diagnostic performance of all clinical biomarkers recommended by international guidelines. Based on these, at least measurement of cancer antigen 125 serum level, assessment of thrombocytosis, and imaging focused on lymphadenopathy should complement current preoperative risk stratification in order to better stratify these patients by risk.

5 February 2020 in International Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
HKHeidi V.N. Küsters‐Vandevelde
Heidi V.N. Küsters‐Vandevelde
MLMarjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg
Marjolijn J.L. Ligtenberg
JBJohan Bulten
Johan Bulten
MOMarloes Oosterwegel
Marloes Oosterwegel
JPJohanna Pijnenborg
Johanna Pijnenborg
Synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOs) represent 10% of all endometrial and ovarian cancers and are assumed to develop as independent entities. We investigated the clonal relationship between endometrial and ovarian carcinomas in a large cohort classified as SEOs or metastatic disease (MD). The molecular profiles were compared to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data to explore primary origin. Subsequently, the molecular profiles were correlated with clinical outcome. To this extent, a retrospective multicenter study was performed comparing patients with SEOs (n = 50), endometrial cancer with synchronous ovarian metastasis (n = 19) and ovarian cancer with synchronous endometrial metastasis (n = 20). Targeted next‐generation sequencing was used, and a clonality index was calculated. Subsequently, cases were classified as POLE mutated, mismatch repair deficient (MMR‐D), TP53‐wild‐type or TP53‐mutated. In 92% of SEOs (46/50), the endometrial and concurrent ovarian carcinoma shared at least one somatic mutation, with a clonality index above 0.95, supporting a clonal origin. The SEO molecular profiles showed striking similarities with the TCGA endometrial carcinoma set. SEOs behaved distinctly different from metastatic disease, with a superior outcome compared to endometrial MD cases (p < 0.001) and ovarian MD cases (p < 0.001). Classification according to the TCGA identified four groups with different clinical outcomes. TP53 mutations and extra‐utero‐ovarian disease were independent predictors for poor clinical outcome. Concluding, SEOs were clonally related in an overwhelming majority of cases and showed a favorable prognosis. Their molecular profile implied a primary endometrial origin. TP53 mutation and extra‐utero‐ovarian disease were independent predictors for outcome, and may impact adjuvant systemic treatment planning.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CRCasper Reijnen
Casper Reijnen
NVNicole Cm Visser
Nicole Cm Visser
JKJenneke C Kasius
Jenneke C Kasius
DBDorry Boll
Dorry Boll
PGPeggy M Geomini
Peggy M Geomini
JPJohanna Pijnenborg
Johanna Pijnenborg
Reijnen C, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30:e70. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e70