Background: Basic life support (BLS) is crucial in the emergency response system, as sudden cardiac arrest is still a major cause of death worldwide. Unfortunately, only a minority of victims receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from bystanders. In this context, training could be helpful to save more lives, and technology-enhanced BLS simulation is one possible solution. Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of our augmented reality (AR) prototype as a tool for BLS training. Methods: Holo-BLSD is an AR self-instruction training system, in which a standard CPR manikin is “augmented” with an interactive virtual environment that reproduces realistic scenarios. Learners can use natural gestures, body movements, and spoken commands to perform their tasks, with virtual 3D objects anchored to the manikin and the environment. During the experience, users were trained to use the device while being guided through an emergency simulation and, at the end, were asked to complete a survey to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the proposed tool (5-point Likert scale; 1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Strongly Agree). Results: The system was rated easy to use (mean 4.00, SD 0.94), and the trainees stated that most people would learn to use it very quickly (mean 4.00, SD 0.89). Voice (mean 4.48, SD 0.87), gaze (mean 4.12, SD 0.97), and gesture interaction (mean 3.84, SD 1.14) were judged positively, although some hand gesture recognition errors reduced the feeling of having the right level of control over the system (mean 3.40, SD 1.04). Conclusions: We found the Holo-BLSD system to be a feasible and acceptable tool for AR BLS training.

Despite the technological and pharmacological advancements in the last 30 years, morbidity and mortality of dialysis patients are still astonishingly high. Today, convective treatments, such as high-flux haemodialysis (hf-HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF), are established techniques; the online production of fresh pure dialysate has provided clinical and economic advantages. Nevertheless, the actual benefits of HDF, even with high-convective-volume treatments, are still debatable. Three recent, randomized controlled trials compared survival outcomes in prevalent patients receiving conventional HD or post-dilution HDF and reported conflicting results. The meta-analyses of the published trials were ultimately incapable of providing a clear and definitive answer on the possible beneficial effects of choosing one treatment over the other. All-cause mortality, anaemia, phosphate control and clearance of small molecules seemed to be unaffected by the treatment modality. On the other hand, cardiovascular mortality, intradialytic vascular stability and the clearance of protein-bound molecules fared better in patients treated with HDF. These results were not consistent between the studies. Thus, there is still no conclusive answer to the question that nephrologists would like to have answered: 'Which is the best treatment for my patient?' In the age of evidence-based medicine, we need strong data to support the superiority of a treatment in comparison with another, although theoretically plausible. There is the need for a well-designed clinical trial comparing outcomes for patients randomly assigned to high- or moderate-convection-volume HDF versus hf-HD to clearly prove the clinical superiority of HDF, including the effect of different infusion volumes.

Introduction: Hyperphosphatemia is common in late stages of chronic kidney disease and is often associated with elevated parathormone levels, abnormal bone mineralization, extra-osseous calcification, and increased risk of cardiovascular events and death. Several classes of oral phosphate binders are available to help control plasma phosphorus levels. Although effective at lowering serum phosphorus, they all have safety, tolerability, and compliance issues that need to be considered when selecting which one to use. Areas covered: This paper reviews the most established treatment options for hyperphosphatemia, in patients with chronic kidney disease, focusing on the new inhibitors of active phosphate absorption. Expert opinion: The prevention and the treatment of hyperphosphatemia is today far to be satisfactory. Nonetheless, an extending range of phosphate binders are now available. Aluminum has potentially serious toxic risks. Calcium-based binders are very effective but can lead to hypercalcemia and/or positive calcium balance and progression of cardiovascular calcification. No long-term data are available for the new calcium acetate/magnesium combination product. Lanthanum is an effective phosphate binder, and long-term effects of tissue deposition seem clinically irrelevant. Sevelamer, appear to have profiles that would lead to pleiotropic effects and reduced progression of vascular calcification, and the main adverse events seen with these agents are gastrointestinal. Iron has a powerful capability of binding phosphate, thus numerous preparations are available, both with and without significant systemic absorption of the iron component. The inhibitors of active intestinal phosphate transport, with their very selective mechanism of action and low pill burden seem the most interesting approach; however, do not seem at present to be effective alone, in reducing serum phosphorus levels.

Background: Dialysis is associated with a non-negligible rate of morbidity, requiring treatment customization. Many mathematical models have been developed describing solute kinetics during hemodialysis (HD) for an average uremic patient. The clinical need can be more adequately addressed by developing a patient-specific, multicompartmental model. Materials and Methods: The data from 148 sessions (20 patients), recorded at the Regional Hospital of Lugano, Switzerland, were used to develop and validate the mathematical model. Diffusive and convective interactions among patient, dialysate and substitution fluid were considered. Three parameters, related to mass transfer efficiency at the cell membrane, at the dialyzer and at the capillary wall, were used to tune the model. The ability of the model to describe the clinical evolution of a specific HD session was evaluated by comparing model outputs with clinically acquired data on solutes and catabolite concentrations. Results: The model developed in this study allows electrolyte and catabolite concentration trends during each HD session to be described. The errors obtained before the estimation of the patient-specific parameters drastically decrease after their identification. With the optimized model, plasmatic concentration trends can be described with an average percent error lower than 2.1% for Na+, CI-, Ca2+ and HCO3-, lower than 5% for K+ and lower than 8% for urea. Conclusions: The peculiarity of the proposed model is the possibility it offers to perform a real-time simulation enabling quantitative appraisal of hematochemical quantities whose direct measurement is prohibitive. These will be beneficial to dialysis therapy planning, reducing intradialysis complications and improving patients’ quality of life.

The clinical benefits of on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus high-flux membranes hemodialysis (hf-HD) are still debated. In fact, although a superiority of one treatment over the other, especially in terms of mortality, did not emerge from the analysis of clinical trials, improved intradialytic vascular stability and cardiovascular mortality have been observed in patients undergoing HDF rather than hf-HD; the lower removal of sodium (Na⁺) during HDF seems to play a major role. The plasma concentration of Na⁺ is the major determinant of plasma tonicity, which, by determining the flow of water between the intracellular and the extracellular compartment, contributes to the vascular refilling process and the maintenance of blood pressure during the hemodialysis treatment. Plasma tonicity also depends on plasma glucose concentration, especially in patients with diabetes mellitus with hyperglycaemia at the start of hemodialysis treatment.