Alessio Squassina

Dr. Alessio Squassina

Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2019 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BKBrian W. Kunkle
Brian W. Kunkle
T(The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (Eadi)
The European Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative (Eadi)
BGBenjamin Grenier-Boley
Benjamin Grenier-Boley
RSRebecca Sims
Rebecca Sims
JBJoshua C. Bis
Joshua C. Bis
MPMargaret A. Pericak-Vance
Margaret A. Pericak-Vance

4 April 2022 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCéline Bellenguez
Céline Bellenguez
FKFahri Küçükali
Fahri Küçükali
IJIris E. Jansen
Iris E. Jansen
LKLuca Kleineidam
Luca Kleineidam
SMSonia Moreno-Grau
Sonia Moreno-Grau
JLJean-Charles Lambert
Jean-Charles Lambert
Characterization of the genetic landscape of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADD) provides a unique opportunity for a better understanding of the associated pathophysiological processes. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study totaling 111,326 clinically diagnosed/‘proxy’ AD cases and 677,663 controls. We found 75 risk loci, of which 42 were new at the time of analysis. Pathway enrichment analyses confirmed the involvement of amyloid/tau pathways and highlighted microglia implication. Gene prioritization in the new loci identified 31 genes that were suggestive of new genetically associated processes, including the tumor necrosis factor alpha pathway through the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex. We also built a new genetic risk score associated with the risk of future AD/dementia or progression from mild cognitive impairment to AD/dementia. The improvement in prediction led to a 1.6- to 1.9-fold increase in AD risk from the lowest to the highest decile, in addition to effects of age and the APOE ε4 allele.

1 March 2016 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LHLiping Hou
Liping Hou
Urs HeilbronnerUrs Heilbronner
Urs Heilbronner
FDFranziska Degenhardt
Franziska Degenhardt
MAMazda Adli
Mazda Adli
KAKazufumi Akiyama
Kazufumi Akiyama
TSThomas Schulze
Thomas Schulze
Lithium is a first-line treatment in bipolar disorder, but individual response is variable. Previous studies have suggested that lithium response is a heritable trait. However, no genetic markers of treatment response have been reproducibly identified. Here, we report the results of a genome-wide association study of lithium response in 2563 patients collected by 22 participating sites from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen). Data from common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested for association with categorical and continuous ratings of lithium response. Lithium response was measured using a well established scale (Alda scale). Genotyped SNPs were used to generate data at more than 6 million sites, using standard genomic imputation methods. Traits were regressed against genotype dosage. Results were combined across two batches by meta-analysis. A single locus of four linked SNPs on chromosome 21 met genome-wide significance criteria for association with lithium response (rs79663003, p=1·37 × 10(-8); rs78015114, p=1·31 × 10(-8); rs74795342, p=3·31 × 10(-9); and rs75222709, p=3·50 × 10(-9)). In an independent, prospective study of 73 patients treated with lithium monotherapy for a period of up to 2 years, carriers of the response-associated alleles had a significantly lower rate of relapse than carriers of the alternate alleles (p=0·03268, hazard ratio 3·8, 95% CI 1·1-13·0). The response-associated region contains two genes for long, non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), AL157359.3 and AL157359.4. LncRNAs are increasingly appreciated as important regulators of gene expression, particularly in the CNS. Confirmed biomarkers of lithium response would constitute an important step forward in the clinical management of bipolar disorder. Further studies are needed to establish the biological context and potential clinical utility of these findings. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program.

7 June 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IRItziar de Rojas
Itziar de Rojas
SMSonia Moreno-Grau
Sonia Moreno-Grau
NTNiccolo Tesi
Niccolo Tesi
BGBenjamin Grenier-Boley
Benjamin Grenier-Boley
VAVictor Andrade
Victor Andrade
ARAgustín Ruiz
Agustín Ruiz
Genetic discoveries of Alzheimer’s disease are the drivers of our understanding, and together with polygenetic risk stratification can contribute towards planning of feasible and efficient preventive and curative clinical trials. We first perform a large genetic association study by merging all available case-control datasets and by-proxy study results (discovery n = 409,435 and validation size n = 58,190). Here, we add six variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease risk (near APP, CHRNE, PRKD3/NDUFAF7, PLCG2 and two exonic variants in the SHARPIN gene). Assessment of the polygenic risk score and stratifying by APOE reveal a 4 to 5.5 years difference in median age at onset of Alzheimer’s disease patients in APOE ɛ4 carriers. Because of this study, the underlying mechanisms of APP can be studied to refine the amyloid cascade and the polygenic risk score provides a tool to select individuals at high risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

21 June 2016 in Human Molecular Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLiping Hou
Liping Hou
SBSarah E. Bergen
Sarah E. Bergen
NANirmala Akula
Nirmala Akula
JSJie Song
Jie Song
CHChristina M. Hultman
Christina M. Hultman
FMFrancis J. McMahon
Francis J. McMahon
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a genetically complex mental illness characterized by severe oscillations of mood and behaviour. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several risk loci that together account for a small portion of the heritability. To identify additional risk loci, we performed a two-stage meta-analysis of >9 million genetic variants in 9,784 bipolar disorder patients and 30,471 controls, the largest GWAS of BD to date. In this study, to increase power we used ∼2,000 lithium-treated cases with a long-term diagnosis of BD from the Consortium on Lithium Genetics, excess controls, and analytic methods optimized for markers on the X-chromosome. In addition to four known loci, results revealed genome-wide significant associations at two novel loci: an intergenic region on 9p21.3 (rs12553324, P =  5.87 × 10 − 9; odds ratio (OR) = 1.12) and markers within ERBB2 (rs2517959, P =  4.53 × 10 − 9; OR = 1.13). No significant X-chromosome associations were detected and X-linked markers explained very little BD heritability. The results add to a growing list of common autosomal variants involved in BD and illustrate the power of comparing well-characterized cases to an excess of controls in GWAS.

19 June 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mirko ManchiaMirko Manchia
Mirko Manchia
MAMazda Adli
Mazda Adli
NANirmala Akula
Nirmala Akula
RARaffaella Ardau
Raffaella Ardau
JAJean-Michel Aubry
Jean-Michel Aubry
MAMartin Alda
Martin Alda
The assessment of response to lithium maintenance treatment in bipolar disorder (BD) is complicated by variable length of treatment, unpredictable clinical course, and often inconsistent compliance. Prospective and retrospective methods of assessment of lithium response have been proposed in the literature. In this study we report the key phenotypic measures of the “Retrospective Criteria of Long-Term Treatment Response in Research Subjects with Bipolar Disorder” scale currently used in the Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLiGen) study. Twenty-nine ConLiGen sites took part in a two-stage case-vignette rating procedure to examine inter-rater agreement [Kappa (κ)] and reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)] of lithium response. Annotated first-round vignettes and rating guidelines were circulated to expert research clinicians for training purposes between the two stages. Further, we analyzed the distributional properties of the treatment response scores available for 1,308 patients using mixture modeling. Substantial and moderate agreement was shown across sites in the first and second sets of vignettes (κ = 0.66 and κ = 0.54, respectively), without significant improvement from training. However, definition of response using the A score as a quantitative trait and selecting cases with B criteria of 4 or less showed an improvement between the two stages (ICC1 = 0.71 and ICC2 = 0.75, respectively). Mixture modeling of score distribution indicated three subpopulations (full responders, partial responders, non responders). We identified two definitions of lithium response, one dichotomous and the other continuous, with moderate to substantial inter-rater agreement and reliability. Accurate phenotypic measurement of lithium response is crucial for the ongoing ConLiGen pharmacogenomic study.