Policy action in the coming decade will be crucial to achieving globally agreed upon goals to decarbonize the economy and build resilience to a warmer, more extreme climate. Public health has an essential role in climate planning and action: “Co-benefits” to health help underpin greenhouse gas reduction strategies, while safeguarding health—particularly of the most vulnerable—is a frontline local adaptation goal. Using the structure of the core functions and essential services (CFES), we reviewed the literature documenting the evolution of public health’s role in climate change action since the 2009 launch of the US CDC Climate and Health Program. We found that the public health response to climate change has been promising in the area of assessment (monitoring climate hazards, diagnosing health status, assessing vulnerability); mixed in the area of policy development (mobilizing partnerships, mitigation and adaptation activities); and relatively weak in assurance (communication, workforce development and evaluation). We suggest that the CFES model remains important, but is not aligned with three concepts—governance, implementation and adjustment—that have taken on increasing importance. Adding these concepts to the model can help ensure that public health fulfills its potential as a proactive partner fully integrated into climate policy planning and action in the coming decade.

An integrated network of environmental monitors was developed to continuously measure several airborne hazards in a manufacturing facility. The monitors integrated low-cost sensors to measure particulate matter, carbon monoxide, ozone and nitrogen dioxide, noise, temperature and humidity. The monitors were developed and tested in situ for three months in several overlapping deployments, before a full cohort of 40 was deployed in a heavy vehicle manufacturing facility for a year of data collection. The monitors collect data from each sensor and report them to a central database every 5 min. The work includes an experimental validation of the particle, gas and noise monitors. The R² for the particle sensor ranges between 0.98 and 0.99 for particle mass densities up to 300 μg/m³. The R² for the carbon monoxide sensor is 0.99 for concentrations up to 15 ppm. The R² for the oxidizing gas sensor is 0.98 over the sensitive range from 20 to 180 ppb. The noise monitor is precise within 1% between 65 and 95 dBA. This work demonstrates the capability of distributed monitoring as a means to examine exposure variability in both space and time, building an important preliminary step towards a new approach for workplace hazard monitoring.

We designed and built a network of monitors for ambient air pollution equipped with low-cost gas sensors to be used to supplement regulatory agency monitoring for exposure assessment within a large epidemiological study. This paper describes the development of a series of hourly and daily field calibration models for Alphasense sensors for carbon monoxide (CO; CO-B4), nitric oxide (NO; NO-B4), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂; NO2-B43F), and oxidizing gases (OX-B431)—which refers to ozone (O₃) and NO₂. The monitor network was deployed in the Puget Sound region of Washington, USA, from May 2017 to March 2019. Monitors were rotated throughout the region, including at two Puget Sound Clean Air Agency monitoring sites for calibration purposes, and over 100 residences, including the homes of epidemiological study participants, with the goal of improving long-term pollutant exposure predictions at participant locations. Calibration models improved when accounting for individual sensor performance, ambient temperature and humidity, and concentrations of co-pollutants as measured by other low-cost sensors in the monitors. Predictions from the final daily models for CO and NO performed the best considering agreement with regulatory monitors in cross-validated root-mean-square error (RMSE) and R² measures (CO: RMSE = 18 ppb, R² = 0.97; NO: RMSE = 2 ppb, R² = 0.97). Performance measures for NO₂ and O₃ were somewhat lower (NO₂: RMSE = 3 ppb, R² = 0.79; O₃: RMSE = 4 ppb, R² = 0.81). These high levels of calibration performance add confidence that low-cost sensor measurements collected at the homes of epidemiological study participants can be integrated into spatiotemporal models of pollutant concentrations, improving exposure assessment for epidemiological inference.

Due to their small size, low-power demands, and customizability, low-cost sensors can be deployed in collections that are spatially distributed in the environment, known as sensor networks. The literature contains examples of such networks in the ambient environment; this article describes the development and deployment of a 40-node multi-hazard network, constructed with low-cost sensors for particulate matter (SHARP GP2Y1010AU0F), carbon monoxide (Alphasense CO-B4), oxidizing gases (Alphasense OX-B421), and noise (developed in-house) in a heavy-vehicle manufacturing facility. Network nodes communicated wirelessly with a central database in order to record hazard measurements at 5-min intervals. Here, we report on the temporal and spatial measurements from the network, precision of network measurements, and accuracy of network measurements with respect to field reference instruments through 8 months of continuous deployment. During typical production periods, 1-h mean hazard levels ± standard deviation across all monitors for particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), oxidizing gases (OX), and noise were 0.62 ± 0.2 mg m⁻³, 7 ± 2 ppm, 155 ± 58 ppb, and 82 ± 1 dBA, respectively. We observed clear diurnal and weekly temporal patterns for all hazards and daily, hazard-specific spatial patterns attributable to general manufacturing processes in the facility. Processes associated with the highest hazard levels were machining and welding (PM and noise), staging (CO), and manual and robotic welding (OX). Network sensors exhibited varying degrees of precision with 95% of measurements among three collocated nodes within 0.21 mg m⁻³ for PM, 0.4 ppm for CO, 9 ppb for OX, and 1 dBA for noise of each other. The median percent bias with reference to direct-reading instruments was 27%, 11%, 45%, and 1%, for PM, CO, OX, and noise, respectively. This study demonstrates the successful long-term deployment of a multi-hazard sensor network in an industrial manufacturing setting and illustrates the high temporal and spatial resolution of hazard data that sensor and monitor networks are capable of. We show that network-derived hazard measurements offer rich datasets to comprehensively assess occupational hazards. Our network sets the stage for the characterization of occupational exposures on the individual level with wireless sensor networks.

This article reports on an interdisciplinary evaluation of the pilot phase of a community-driven civic science project. The project investigates the distribution of heavy metals in air pollution using moss growing on street trees as a bio-indicator in two industrial-adjacent neighborhoods in Seattle, Washington (USA). One goal of the ongoing project is to meaningfully engage local urban youths (eighth to twelfth grade) in the scientific process as civic scientists, and teach them about environmental health, environmental justice, and urban forestry concepts in a place-based, urban-oriented environmental research project. We describe the collaborative context in which our project developed, evaluate the quality of youth-collected data through analysis of replicate samples, and assess participants’ learning, career interests, and overall appraisal of the pilot. Our results indicate that youth scientists collected usable samples (with acceptable precision among repeated samples), learned project content (with statistically significant increases in scores of test-style survey questions; p = 0.002), and appraised their engagement favorably (with 69% of participants reporting they liked the project). We observed few changes in career interests, however. We discuss our intention to use these preliminary insights to further our community-driven education, research, and action model to address environmental injustices.

Deployment of low-cost sensors in the field is increasingly popular. However, each sensor requires on-site calibration to increase the accuracy of the measurements. We established a laboratory method, the Average Slope Method, to select sensors with similar response so that a single, on-site calibration for one sensor can be used for all other sensors. The laboratory method was performed with aerosolized salt. Based on linear regression, we calculated slopes for 100 particulate matter (PM) sensors, and 50% of the PM sensors fell within ±14% of the average slope. We then compared our Average Slope Method with an Individual Slope Method and concluded that our first method balanced convenience and precision for our application. Laboratory selection was tested in the field, where we deployed 40 PM sensors inside a heavy-manufacturing site at spatially optimal locations and performed a field calibration to calculate a slope for three PM sensors with a reference instrument at one location. The average slope was applied to all PM sensors for mass concentration calculations. The calculated percent differences in the field were similar to the laboratory results. Therefore, we established a method that reduces the time and cost associated with calibration of low-cost sensors in the field.