John Heap

John Heap


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2009 in Journal of Microbiological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
OPOliver J. Pennington
Oliver J. Pennington
SCStephen T. Cartman
Stephen T. Cartman
Nigel MintonNigel Minton
Nigel Minton

1 January 2010 in Journal of Microbiological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
SKSarah A. Kuehne
Sarah A. Kuehne
MEMuhammad Ehsaan
Muhammad Ehsaan
SCStephen T. Cartman
Stephen T. Cartman
CCClare M. Cooksley
Clare M. Cooksley
Nigel MintonNigel Minton
Nigel Minton

1 February 2018 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LVLara Sellés Vidal
Lara Sellés Vidal
CKCiarán L. Kelly
Ciarán L. Kelly
PMPaweł M. Mordaka
Paweł M. Mordaka
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases catalyze the reduction or oxidation of a substrate coupled to the oxidation or reduction, respectively, of a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide cofactor NAD(P)H or NAD(P)+. NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases catalyze a large variety of reactions and play a pivotal role in many central metabolic pathways. Due to the high activity, regiospecificity and stereospecificity with which they catalyze redox reactions, they have been used as key components in a wide range of applications, including substrate utilization, the synthesis of chemicals, biodegradation and detoxification. There is great interest in tailoring NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases to make them more suitable for particular applications. Here, we review the main properties and classes of NAD(P)H-dependent oxidoreductases, the types of reactions they catalyze, some of the main protein engineering techniques used to modify their properties and some interesting examples of their modification and application.

18 January 2012 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
MEMuhammad Ehsaan
Muhammad Ehsaan
CCClare M. Cooksley
Clare M. Cooksley
YNYen-Kuan Ng
Yen-Kuan Ng
SCStephen T. Cartman
Stephen T. Cartman
Nigel MintonNigel Minton
Nigel Minton
Most bacteria can only be transformed with circular plasmids, so robust DNA integration methods for these rely upon selection of single-crossover clones followed by counter-selection of double-crossover clones. To overcome the limited availability of heterologous counter-selection markers, here we explore novel DNA integration strategies that do not employ them, and instead exploit (i) activation or inactivation of genes leading to a selectable phenotype, and (ii) asymmetrical regions of homology to control the order of recombination events. We focus here on the industrial biofuel-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum , which previously lacked robust integration tools, but the approach we have developed is broadly applicable. Large sequences can be delivered in a series of steps, as we demonstrate by inserting the chromosome of phage lambda (minus a region apparently unstable in Escherichia coli in our cloning context) into the chromosome of C. acetobutylicum in three steps. This work should open the way to reliable integration of DNA including large synthetic constructs in diverse microorganisms.

27 January 2023 in RSC Chemical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LVLara Sellés Vidal
Lara Sellés Vidal
MIMark Isalan
Mark Isalan
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
Rodrigo Ledesma-AmaroRodrigo Ledesma-Amaro
Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro
Directed evolution is one of the most powerful tools for protein engineering and functions by harnessing natural evolution, but on a shorter timescale. It enables the rapid selection of variants of biomolecules with properties that make them more suitable for specific applications. Since the first in vitro evolution experiments performed by Sol Spiegelman in 1967, a wide range of techniques have been developed to tackle the main two steps of directed evolution: genetic diversification (library generation), and isolation of the variants of interest. This review covers the main modern methodologies, discussing the advantages and drawbacks of each, and hence the considerations for designing directed evolution experiments. Furthermore, the most recent developments are discussed, showing how advances in the handling of ever larger library sizes are enabling new research questions to be tackled.

20 November 2018 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GTGeorge M Taylor
George M Taylor
PMPaweł M Mordaka
Paweł M Mordaka
JHJohn Heap
John Heap
DNA assembly allows individual DNA constructs or libraries to be assembled quickly and reliably. Most methods are either: (i) Modular, easily scalable and suitable for combinatorial assembly, but leave undesirable ‘scar’ sequences; or (ii) bespoke (non-modular), scarless but less suitable for construction of combinatorial libraries. Both have limitations for metabolic engineering. To overcome this trade-off we devised Start-Stop Assembly, a multi-part, modular DNA assembly method which is both functionally scarless and suitable for combinatorial assembly. Crucially, 3 bp overhangs corresponding to start and stop codons are used to assemble coding sequences into expression units, avoiding scars at sensitive coding sequence boundaries. Building on this concept, a complete DNA assembly framework was designed and implemented, allowing assembly of up to 15 genes from up to 60 parts (or mixtures); monocistronic, operon-based or hybrid configurations; and a new streamlined assembly hierarchy minimizing the number of vectors. Only one destination vector is required per organism, reflecting our optimization of the system for metabolic engineering in diverse organisms. Metabolic engineering using Start-Stop Assembly was demonstrated by combinatorial assembly of carotenoid pathways in Escherichia coli resulting in a wide range of carotenoid production and colony size phenotypes indicating the intended exploration of design space.