Sarah Adams

Dr. Sarah Adams


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2015 in Cancer Immunology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THTomoe Higuchi
Tomoe Higuchi
DFDallas B. Flies
Dallas B. Flies
NMNicole A. Marjon
Nicole A. Marjon
GMGina Mantia-Smaldone
Gina Mantia-Smaldone
LRLukas Ronner
Lukas Ronner
SASarah Adams
Sarah Adams
Immune checkpoint blockade has shown significant therapeutic efficacy in melanoma and other solid tumors, but results in ovarian cancer have been limited. With evidence that tumor immunogenicity modulates the response to checkpoint blockade, and data indicating that BRCA-deficient ovarian cancers express higher levels of immune response genes, we hypothesized that BRCA− ovarian tumors would be vulnerable to checkpoint blockade. To test this hypothesis, we used an immunocompetent BRCA1-deficient murine ovarian cancer model to compare treatment with CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies alone or combined with targeted cytotoxic therapy using a PARP inhibitor. Correlative studies were performed in vitro using human BRCA1− cells. We found that CTLA-4 antibody, but not PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, synergized therapeutically with the PARP inhibitor, resulting in immune-mediated tumor clearance and long-term survival in a majority of animals (P < 0.0001). The survival benefit of this combination was T-cell mediated and dependent on increases in local IFNγ production in the peritoneal tumor environment. Evidence of protective immune memory was observed more than 60 days after completion of therapy. Similar increases in the cytotoxic effect of PARP inhibition in the presence of elevated levels of IFNγ in human BRCA1− cancer cells support the translational potential of this treatment protocol. These results demonstrate that CTLA-4 blockade combined with PARP inhibition induces protective antitumor immunity and significant survival benefit in the BRCA1− tumor model, and support clinical testing of this regimen to improve outcomes for women with hereditary ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(11); 1257–68. ©2015 AACR.

13 May 2016 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DFDallas B. Flies
Dallas B. Flies
THTomoe Higuchi
Tomoe Higuchi
JHJaryse C. Harris
Jaryse C. Harris
VJVibha Jha
Vibha Jha
PGPhyllis A. Gimotty
Phyllis A. Gimotty
SASarah Adams
Sarah Adams
Although immune infiltrates in ovarian cancer are associated with improved survival, the ovarian tumor environment has been characterized as immunosuppressive, due in part to functional shifts among dendritic cells with disease progression. We hypothesized that flux in dendritic cell subpopulations with cancer progression were responsible for observed differences in antitumor immune responses in early and late-stage disease. Here we identify three dendritic cell subsets with disparate functions in the ovarian tumor environment. CD11c+CD11b(−)CD103+ dendritic cells are absent in the peritoneal cavity of healthy mice but comprise up to 40% of dendritic cells in tumor-bearing mice and retain T cell stimulatory capacity in advanced disease. Among CD11c+CD11b+ cells, Lair-1 expression distinguishes stimulatory and immunoregulatory DC subsets, which are also enriched in the tumor environment. Notably, PD-L1 is expressed by Lair-1(hi) immunoregulatory dendritic cells, and may contribute to local tumor antigen-specific T cell dysfunction. Using an adoptive transfer model, we find that PD-1 blockade enables tumor-associated CD103+ dendritic cells to promote disease clearance. These data demonstrate that antitumor immune capacity is maintained among local dendritic cell subpopulations in the tumor environment with cancer progression. Similar dendritic cell subsets are present in malignant ascites from women with ovarian cancer, supporting the translational relevance of these results.

22 February 2023 in Cancer Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMara P. Steinkamp
Mara P. Steinkamp
ILIrina Lagutina
Irina Lagutina
KBKathryn J. Brayer
Kathryn J. Brayer
FSFred Schultz
Fred Schultz
DBDanielle Burke
Danielle Burke
Angela Wandinger-NessAngela Wandinger-Ness
Angela Wandinger-Ness
The importance of the immune microenvironment in ovarian cancer progression, metastasis, and response to therapies has become increasingly clear, especially with the new emphasis on immunotherapies. To leverage the power of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models within a humanized immune microenvironment, three ovarian cancer PDXs were grown in humanized NBSGW (huNBSGW) mice engrafted with human CD34+ cord blood–derived hematopoietic stem cells. Analysis of cytokine levels in the ascites fluid and identification of infiltrating immune cells in the tumors demonstrated that these humanized PDX (huPDX) established an immune tumor microenvironment similar to what has been reported for patients with ovarian cancer. The lack of human myeloid cell differentiation has been a major setback for humanized mouse models, but our analysis shows that PDX engraftment increases the human myeloid population in the peripheral blood. Analysis of cytokines within the ascites fluid of huPDX revealed high levels of human M-CSF, a key myeloid differentiation factor as well as other elevated cytokines that have previously been identified in ovarian cancer patient ascites fluid including those involved in immune cell differentiation and recruitment. Human tumor-associated macrophages and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were detected within the tumors of humanized mice, demonstrating immune cell recruitment to tumors. Comparison of the three huPDX revealed certain differences in cytokine signatures and in the extent of immune cell recruitment. Our studies show that huNBSGW PDX models reconstitute important aspects of the ovarian cancer immune tumor microenvironment, which may recommend these models for preclinical therapeutic trials. Significance: huPDX models are ideal preclinical models for testing novel therapies. They reflect the genetic heterogeneity of the patient population, enhance human myeloid differentiation, and recruit immune cells to the tumor microenvironment.

24 July 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLaurie G. Hudson
Laurie G. Hudson
LCLinda Cook
Linda Cook
MGMartha Grimes
Martha Grimes
CMCarolyn Y. Muller
Carolyn Y. Muller
SASarah Adams
Sarah Adams
Angela Wandinger-NessAngela Wandinger-Ness
Angela Wandinger-Ness
Cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy are cornerstones of ovarian cancer treatment, yet disease recurrence remains a significant clinical issue. Surgery can release cancer cells into the circulation, suppress anti-tumor immunity, and induce inflammatory responses that support the growth of residual disease. Intervention within the peri-operative window is an under-explored opportunity to mitigate these consequences of surgery and influence the course of metastatic disease to improve patient outcomes. One drug associated with improved survival in cancer patients is ketorolac. Ketorolac is a chiral molecule administered as a 1:1 racemic mixture of the S- and R-enantiomers. The S-enantiomer is considered the active component for its FDA indication in pain management with selective activity against cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes. The R-enantiomer has a previously unrecognized activity as an inhibitor of Rac1 (Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate) and Cdc42 (cell division control protein 42) GTPases. Therefore, ketorolac differs from other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) by functioning as two distinct pharmacologic entities due to the independent actions of each enantiomer. In this review, we summarize evidence supporting the benefits of ketorolac administration for ovarian cancer patients. We also discuss how simultaneous inhibition of these two distinct classes of targets, COX enzymes and Rac1/Cdc42, by S-ketorolac and R-ketorolac respectively, could each contribute to anti-cancer activity.

13 April 2026 in Nature Reviews Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFrances R. Balkwill
Frances R. Balkwill
CLCéline M. Laumont
Céline M. Laumont
NBNikki Burdett
Nikki Burdett
OSOlivia Le Saux
Olivia Le Saux
DGDale W. Garsed
Dale W. Garsed
DBDavid D. Bowtell
David D. Bowtell

16 November 2016 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CACasey Ager
Casey Ager
MRMatthew Reilley
Matthew Reilley
CNCourtney Nicholas
Courtney Nicholas
TBTodd Bartkowiak
Todd Bartkowiak
AJAshvin Jaiswal
Ashvin Jaiswal
SPSumanta Pal
Sumanta Pal