This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
Zusammenfassung Klimagerechtigkeit heißt, den Umgang mit den Ursachen, Folgen und Kosten des menschengemachten Klimawandels zu regeln, ohne dabei bestimmte soziale Gruppen zu benachteiligen. Dazu gibt es Vorstellungen von einer gerechten Verteilung und Prinzipien für das richtige Handeln. Aber wie lässt sich Klimagerechtigkeit mit konkreten politischen Maßnahmen erreichen? In diesem Beitrag argumentieren wir, dass eine nachhaltige Sozialpolitik, in der soziale Gerechtigkeit und Klimaschutz zusammengebracht werden, die dazu nötigen vielfältigen sozialökologischen Maßnahmen und Instrumente zur Verfügung stellt. Wir zeichnen zunächst kurz die Entstehung der Klimagerechtigkeitsbewegung im Kontext der globalen Umweltpolitik nach und diskutieren die Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede zum Konzept der nachhaltigen Sozialpolitik. Anschließend unterbreiten wir Vorschläge, wie z. B. durch die Einführung einer sozialökologischen Steuerreform, von Klimasozialversicherungen und anderen Instrumenten nachhaltige Sozialpolitik in der Praxis gestaltet werden kann.
Martin Fritz; Katharina Bohnenberger. Sozialpolitik for Future. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 2020, 33, 269 -281.
AMA StyleMartin Fritz, Katharina Bohnenberger. Sozialpolitik for Future. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen. 2020; 33 (1):269-281.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartin Fritz; Katharina Bohnenberger. 2020. "Sozialpolitik for Future." Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33, no. 1: 269-281.
The emerging concept of sustainable welfare attempts to integrate environmental sustainability and social welfare research. Oriented at a mid-term re-embedding of Western production and consumption norms into planetary limits, it suggests the development of “eco-social” policies in the rich countries. In this theoretical context, this article empirically investigates the relationships between attitudes towards welfare and climate policy in 23 countries. Using 2016 data from the European Social Survey, we explored patterns of synergy between both kinds of policies as well as effects of crowding-out, where support for one kind of policy involves refusing the other. Since previous research addressed the role of welfare states and their institutional foundations in establishing environmentally sustainable societies, we studied how attitudes towards welfare and climate policies differ according to welfare regime affiliation. Additionally, we examined how a range of socio-demographic and political factors such as class, education, income, and political position shape people’s views on welfare and climate policy goals. The results of a multiple correspondence analysis indicate that the simultaneous support of welfare and climate policies follows welfare regime lines in that this support is the highest among social-democratic countries. However, also some conservative and Mediterranean countries score high in this regard. At the individual level, people with a higher education, employees in socio-cultural professions, and voters of moderate left and green parties display the highest mutual support for welfare and climate policies.
Martin Fritz; Max Koch. Public Support for Sustainable Welfare Compared: Links between Attitudes towards Climate and Welfare Policies. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4146 .
AMA StyleMartin Fritz, Max Koch. Public Support for Sustainable Welfare Compared: Links between Attitudes towards Climate and Welfare Policies. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (15):4146.
Chicago/Turabian StyleMartin Fritz; Max Koch. 2019. "Public Support for Sustainable Welfare Compared: Links between Attitudes towards Climate and Welfare Policies." Sustainability 11, no. 15: 4146.