Jan van der Borg

Prof. Dr. Jan van der Borg

Division of Geography and Tourism, KU Leuven & Department of Economics, University Ca’Foscari Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1996 in Annals of Tourism Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jan van der BorgJan van der Borg
Jan van der Borg
PCPaolo Costa
Paolo Costa
GGGiuseppe Gotti
Giuseppe Gotti

1 December 2002 in Tourism Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAntonio Paolo Russo
Antonio Paolo Russo
Jan van der BorgJan van der Borg
Jan van der Borg

9 January 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDario Bertocchi
Dario Bertocchi
NCNicola Camatti
Nicola Camatti
SGSilvio Giove
Silvio Giove
Jan van der BorgJan van der Borg
Jan van der Borg
Overtourism problems, anti-tourist movements and negative externalities of tourism are popular research approaches and are key concepts to better understand the sustainable development of tourism destinations. In many of the overtourism narratives, Venice is considered to be one of the most relevant cases of overtourism and therefore has become a laboratory for studying the different conflicts that emerge when tourism numbers continue to grow and the quality of the tourism flow continues to decline. This article is therefore focusing on Venice and on one of the possible solutions to mitigate the negative impacts of tourism represented by the concept of a tourist carrying capacity (TCC) in an urban destination. The aim of this paper is to discuss alternative methodologies regarding the calculation of the TCC, and to apply a fuzzy instead of a ‘crisp’ linear programming model to determine the scenarios of a sustainable number of tourists in the cultural destination of Venice, looking for the optimal compromise between, on the one hand, the wish of maximizing the monetary gain by the local tourism sectors and, on the other, the desire to control the undesirable effects that tourism exerts on a destination by the local population. To solve the problems related to tourism statistics and data availability, some uncertainty in the parameters has been included using fuzzy numbers. The fuzziness in the model was introduced on the basis of questionnaires distributed among both tourists and residents. By applying the fuzzy linear programming model to the emblematic case of Venice, it was shown that this approach can indeed help destinations to understand the challenges of sustainable tourism development better, to evaluate the impact of alternative policies of overtourism on the sustainability of tourism, and hence, to help design a strategy to manage tourist flows more adequately

10 November 2020 in Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNicola Camatti
Nicola Camatti
DBDario Bertocchi
Dario Bertocchi
HCHrvoje Carić
Hrvoje Carić
Jan van der BorgJan van der Borg
Jan van der Borg
In order to design effective responses to the complex phenomenon of overtourism, the tourism carrying capacity (TCC) of a destination is an essential reference point. This paper provides in-depth analysis of this correlation through the case study of Dubrovnik. The study applies a TCC calculation model that is able to quantitatively include the main effects of overtourism. The paper illustrates how these results can be used to automate specific decongestion policies by conceptualising a digital response system for real-time intervention to mitigate the undesirable effects of overtourism.


20 June 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bart NeutsBart Neuts
Bart Neuts
SKSenne Kimps
Senne Kimps
Jan van der BorgJan van der Borg
Jan van der Borg
While the potential macro-economic benefits of tourism development have been well-established, the negative social effects of uninhibited growth have received increased attention in the last decade, emphasizing the central role of communities in the search for a sustainable balance in tourism. This paper focuses on the relatively underdeveloped Scheldeland region in Flanders (Belgium), where a strategic goal is to leverage cultural and natural heritage to boost development. Via a resident questionnaire based on a simplified version of the Resident Empowerment through Tourism Scale (RETS), we identified support for tourism development and deconstructed the drivers of this support. The objective was to empirically validate the research instrument and underlying theory in a situation of relative ‘undertourism’ and prospective future growth. The questionnaire collected 2058 responses, and the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) results indicated that support for tourism, which was generally high across the seven municipalities, was mainly affected by social, psychological, and political empowerment, with personal economic benefits not playing a significant role. These results show that social exchange theory (SET) as a theoretical basis for potential tourism support has limited validity in currently underdeveloped destinations. Secondly, comparatively speaking, the municipalities with the lowest tourism development were least supportive of tourism growth, with an increase in tourism intensity seemingly leading to increasing support due to a higher awareness of accrued benefits through tourism.