We describe a new class of potent PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors based on a terphenyl scaffold that is derived from the rigidified biphenyl-inspired structure. Using in silico docking, we designed and then experimentally demonstrated the effectiveness of the terphenyl-based scaffolds in inhibiting PD-1/PD-L1 complex formation using various biophysical and biochemical techniques. We also present a high-resolution structure of the complex of PD-L1 with one of our most potent inhibitors to identify key PD-L1/inhibitor interactions at the molecular level. In addition, we show the efficacy of our most potent inhibitors in activating the antitumor response using primary human immune cells from healthy donors.
The PD-1/PD-L1 axis has proven to be a highly efficacious target for cancer immune checkpoint therapy with several approved antibodies. Also, small molecules based on a biphenyl core can antagonize PD-1/PD-L1, leading to the in vitro formation of PD-L1 dimers. However, their development remains challenging, as we do not yet fully understand their mode of action. In this work, we designed a new scaffold based on our previously solved high-resolution structures of low-molecular-weight inhibitors bound to PD-L1. A small compound library was synthesized using the Groebke–Blackburn–Bienaymé multicomponent reaction (GBB-3CR), resulting in the structure–activity relationship of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-based inhibitors. These inhibitors were tested for their biological activity using various biophysical assays giving potent candidates with low-micromolar PD-L1 affinities. An obtained PD-L1 cocrystal structure reveals the binding to PD-L1. Our results open the door to an interesting bioactive scaffold that could lead to a new class of PD-L1 antagonists.
The protein p53, known as the “Guardian of the Genome”, plays an important role in maintaining DNA integrity, providing protection against cancer-promoting mutations. Dysfunction of p53 is observed in almost every cancer, with 50% of cases bearing loss-of-function mutations/deletions in the TP53 gene. In the remaining 50% of cases the overexpression of HDM2 (mouse double minute 2, human homolog) protein, which is a natural inhibitor of p53, is the most common way of keeping p53 inactive. Disruption of HDM2-p53 interaction with the use of HDM2 antagonists leads to the release of p53 and expression of its target genes, engaged in the induction of cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, senescence, and apoptosis. The induction of apoptosis, however, is restricted to only a handful of p53wt cells, and, generally, cancer cells treated with HDM2 antagonists are not efficiently eliminated. For this reason, HDM2 antagonists were tested in combinations with multiple other therapeutics in a search for synergy that would enhance the cancer eradication. This manuscript aims at reviewing the recent progress in developing strategies of combined cancer treatment with the use of HDM2 antagonists.
1 March 2019 in Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents
Introduction: MDM2 and MDMX proteins provide the inhibition of p53 tumor suppressor, thus allowing for accelerated mutation-driven cancer microevolution. A pharmacological blockade of MDM2/X-p53 interaction results in p53 reactivation in p53wt cells, leading to cancer growth inhibition. Throughout the past 20 years, multiple chemical entities have been proposed to reactivate p53 by antagonizing MDM2/X proteins. Areas covered: This manuscript reviews 2014–2018 therapeutic patents in the field of MDM2/X antagonists and is a continuation of previous reviews on similar matter. The patents covering the use of MDM2/X antagonists in drug combinations are also presented in this review, as they constitute an important trend in the field of cancer treatment with MDM2/X antagonists. Expert opinion: In the years 2014–2018, several previously-known chemical scaffolds have been further developed and disclosed. Importantly, in the same time period, many lead compounds have entered clinical trials for the treatment of cancer patients. Meanwhile, several important reports have pointed to serious limitations of anticancer properties of MDM2 antagonists. As a result, many efforts have been made to seek for positive, synergistic therapeutic effects of combined anti-cancer treatment strategies. One recent example is a dual targeting of MDM2 and additional protein targets by utilizing the PROTAC technology.
Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) interaction has become an established strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Although hundreds of small-molecule, peptide, and peptidomimetic inhibitors have been proposed in recent years, only a limited number of drug candidates show good PD-1/PD-L1 blocking activity in cell-based assays. In this article, we compare representative molecules from different classes in terms of their PD-1/PD-L1 dissociation capacity measured by HTRF and in vitro bioactivity determined by the immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) co-culture assay. We point to recent discoveries that underscore important differences in the mechanisms of action of these molecules and also indicate one principal feature that needs to be considered, which is the eventual human PD-L1 specificity.