Sebastian Ludwig

Dr. Sebastian Ludwig

Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 August 2022 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAugustin Coisne
Augustin Coisne
Andrea ScottiAndrea Scotti
Andrea Scotti
Azeem LatibAzeem Latib
Azeem Latib
DMDavid Montaigne
David Montaigne
EHEdwin C. Ho
Edwin C. Ho
JGJuan F. Granada
Juan F. Granada

27 February 2023 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJaffar M. Khan
Jaffar M. Khan
NKNorihiko Kamioka
Norihiko Kamioka
JLJohn C. Lisko
John C. Lisko
EPEmily Perdoncin
Emily Perdoncin
CZCheng Zhang
Cheng Zhang
TRToby Rogers
Toby Rogers

8 April 2024 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarianna Adamo
Marianna Adamo
GRGiulio Russo
Giulio Russo
MPMatteo Pagnesi
Matteo Pagnesi
EPEdoardo Pancaldi
Edoardo Pancaldi
HAHannes Alessandrini
Hannes Alessandrini
MTMaurizio Taramasso
Maurizio Taramasso

23 September 2024 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGiulio Russo
Giulio Russo
DPDaniela Pedicino
Daniela Pedicino
DMDenise Pires Marafon
Denise Pires Marafon
MAMarianna Adamo
Marianna Adamo
HAHannes Alessandrini
Hannes Alessandrini
MTMaurizio Taramasso
Maurizio Taramasso

1 February 2021 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GMGuillem Muntané-Carol
Guillem Muntané-Carol
MTMaurizio Taramasso
Maurizio Taramasso
MMMizuki Miura
Mizuki Miura
MGMara Gavazzoni
Mara Gavazzoni
APAlberto Pozzoli
Alberto Pozzoli
JRJosep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Background: Scarce data exist on patients with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) or pulmonary hypertension (PH) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention. This study aimed to determine the early and midterm outcomes and the factors associated with mortality in this group of patients. Methods: This subanalysis of the multicenter TriValve (Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Therapies) registry included 300 patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation with RVD (n=244), PH (n=127), or both (n=71) undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention. RVD was defined as a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm, and PH as an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure ≥50 mm Hg. Results: Mean age of the patients was 77±9 years (54% women). Procedural success was 80.7%, and 9 patients (3%) died during the hospitalization. At a median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range, 2–12) months, 54 patients (18%) died, and the independent associated factors were higher gamma-glutamyl transferase values at baseline (hazard ratio, 1.02 for each increase of 10 u/L [95% CI, 1.002–1.04]), poorer renal function defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min (hazard ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.22–4.33]), and the lack of procedural success (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.17–3.81]). The grade of RVD and the amount of PH at baseline were not found to be predictors of mortality. Most patients alive at follow-up improved their functional class (New York Heart Association I–II in 66% versus 7% at baseline, P <0.001). Conclusions: In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and RVD/PH, transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention was associated with high procedural success and a relatively low in-hospital mortality, along with significant improvements in functional status. However, about 1 out of 5 patients died after a median follow-up of 6 months, with hepatic congestion, renal dysfunction, and the lack of procedural success determining an increased risk. These results may improve the clinical evaluation of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention candidates and would suggest a closer follow-up in those at increased risk. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03416166.

1 May 2023 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SLSebastian Ludwig
Sebastian Ludwig
NSNiklas Schofer
Niklas Schofer
MMohamed Abdel Wahab.
Mohamed Abdel Wahab.
MUMarina Urena
Marina Urena
GJGuillaume Jean
Guillaume Jean
MCMarie-Annick Clavel
Marie-Annick Clavel
Background: The potential benefit of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with nonsevere aortic stenosis (AS) and heart failure is controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of patients with nonsevere low-gradient AS (LGAS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing TAVR or medical management. Methods: Patients undergoing TAVR for LGAS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<50%) were included in a multinational registry. True-severe low-gradient AS (TS-LGAS) and pseudo-severe low-gradient AS (PS-LGAS) were classified according to computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification thresholds. A medical control group with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and moderate AS or PS-LGAS was used (Medical-Mod). Adjusted outcomes between all groups were compared. Among patients with nonsevere AS (moderate or PS-LGAS), outcomes after TAVR and medical therapy were compared using propensity score-matching. Results: A total of 706 LGAS patients undergoing TAVR (TS-LGAS, N=527; PS-LGAS, N=179) and 470 Medical-Mod patients were included. After adjustment, both TAVR groups showed superior survival compared with Medical-Mod patients (all P <0.001), while no difference was found between TS-LGAS and PS-LGAS TAVR patients ( P =0.96). After propensity score-matching among patients with nonsevere AS, PS-LGAS TAVR patients showed superior 2-year overall (65.4%) and cardiovascular survival (80.4%) compared with Medical-Mod patients (48.8% and 58.5%, both P ≤0.004). In a multivariable analysis including all patients with nonsevere AS, TAVR was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.27–0.55]; P <0.0001). Conclusions: Among patients with nonsevere AS and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, TAVR represents a major predictor of superior survival. These results reinforce the need for randomized-controlled trials comparing TAVR versus medical management in heart failure patients with nonsevere AS. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04914481.