Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Dr. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 March 2010 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKresten Lindorff-Larsen
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
KPKim Palmo
Kim Palmo
PMPaul Maragakis
Paul Maragakis
JKJohn L. Klepeis
John L. Klepeis
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw
Recent advances in hardware and software have enabled increasingly long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of biomolecules, exposing certain limitations in the accuracy of the force fields used for such simulations and spurring efforts to refine these force fields. Recent modifications to the Amber and CHARMM protein force fields, for example, have improved the backbone torsion potentials, remedying deficiencies in earlier versions. Here, we further advance simulation accuracy by improving the amino acid side‐chain torsion potentials of the Amber ff99SB force field. First, we used simulations of model alpha‐helical systems to identify the four residue types whose rotamer distribution differed the most from expectations based on Protein Data Bank statistics. Second, we optimized the side‐chain torsion potentials of these residues to match new, high‐level quantum‐mechanical calculations. Finally, we used microsecond‐timescale MD simulations in explicit solvent to validate the resulting force field against a large set of experimental NMR measurements that directly probe side‐chain conformations. The new force field, which we have termed Amber ff99SB‐ILDN, exhibits considerably better agreement with the NMR data. Proteins 2010.

28 October 2011 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KLKresten Lindorff-Larsen
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
RDRon O. Dror
Ron O. Dror
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw
Millisecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations of 12 proteins reveal a set of common principles for protein folding.

15 October 2010 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw
PMPaul Maragakis
Paul Maragakis
KLKresten Lindorff-Larsen
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
RDRon O. Dror
Ron O. Dror
WWWilly Wriggers
Willy Wriggers
Following Folding Fast: Many protein functions involve conformational changes that occur on time-scales between tens of microseconds and milliseconds. This has limited the usefulness of all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, which are performed over shorter time-scales. Shaw et al. (p. 341 ) now report millisecond-scale, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations in an explicitly represented solvent environment. Simulation of the folding of a WW domain showed a well-defined folding pathway and simulation of the dynamics of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor showed interconversion between distinct conformational states.

1 May 2011 in Biophysical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPStefano Piana
Stefano Piana
KLKresten Lindorff-Larsen
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
DSDavid E. Shaw
David E. Shaw

1 April 2009 in Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJohn L Klepeis
John L Klepeis
KLKresten Lindorff-Larsen
Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
RDRon O Dror
Ron O Dror
DSDavid E Shaw
David E Shaw

7 November 2022 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMehmet Akdel
Mehmet Akdel
DPDouglas E. V. Pires
Douglas E. V. Pires
EPEduard Porta Pardo
Eduard Porta Pardo
JJJürgen Jänes
Jürgen Jänes
AZArthur Olegovich Zalevsky
Arthur Olegovich Zalevsky
PBPedro Beltrao
Pedro Beltrao
Most proteins fold into 3D structures that determine how they function and orchestrate the biological processes of the cell. Recent developments in computational methods for protein structure predictions have reached the accuracy of experimentally determined models. Although this has been independently verified, the implementation of these methods across structural-biology applications remains to be tested. Here, we evaluate the use of AlphaFold2 (AF2) predictions in the study of characteristic structural elements; the impact of missense variants; function and ligand binding site predictions; modeling of interactions; and modeling of experimental structural data. For 11 proteomes, an average of 25% additional residues can be confidently modeled when compared with homology modeling, identifying structural features rarely seen in the Protein Data Bank. AF2-based predictions of protein disorder and complexes surpass dedicated tools, and AF2 models can be used across diverse applications equally well compared with experimentally determined structures, when the confidence metrics are critically considered. In summary, we find that these advances are likely to have a transformative impact in structural biology and broader life-science research.