Shigekazu Sugino

Dr. Shigekazu Sugino

Tohoku University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2016 in Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TCTomohiro Chaki
Tomohiro Chaki
SSShigekazu Sugino
Shigekazu Sugino
PJPiotr K. Janicki
Piotr K. Janicki
YIYoshiya Ishioka
Yoshiya Ishioka
YHYosuke Hatakeyama
Yosuke Hatakeyama
MYMichiaki Yamakage
Michiaki Yamakage
Background: Mixtures of various local anesthetics, such as lidocaine and ropivacaine, have been widely used. However, their efficacy and safety for scalp nerve blocks and local infiltration during awake craniotomy have not been fully elucidated. Methods: We prospectively investigated 53 patients who underwent awake craniotomy. Scalp block was performed for the blockade of the supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, auriculotemporal, greater occipital, and lesser occipital nerves with a mixture containing equal volumes of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% ropivacaine, including 5 μg/mL of epinephrine. Infiltration anesthesia was applied at the site of skin incision using the same mixture. The study outcomes included changes in heart rate and blood pressure after head pinning and skin incision, and incidence of severe pain on emergence from anesthesia. Total doses and plasma concentrations of lidocaine and ropivacaine were measured at different time points after performing the block. Results: The heart rate and blood pressure after head pinning were marginally, but significantly, increased when compared with baseline values. There were no significant differences in heart rate and blood pressure before and after the skin incision. Nineteen percent of the patients (10/53) complained of incisional pain at emergence from anesthesia. The highest observed blood concentrations of lidocaine and ropivacaine were 1.9±0.9 and 1.1±0.4 μg/mL, respectively. No acute anesthetic toxicity symptom was observed. Conclusions: Scalp block with a mixture of lidocaine and ropivacaine seems to provide effective and safe anesthetic management in patients undergoing awake craniotomy.

24 May 2014 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShigekazu Sugino
Shigekazu Sugino
THTomo Hayase
Tomo Hayase
MHMisako Higuchi
Misako Higuchi
KSKatsuhiko Saito
Katsuhiko Saito
HMHiroyuki Moriya
Hiroyuki Moriya
PJPiotr K. Janicki
Piotr K. Janicki

1 May 2004 in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShigekazu Sugino
Shigekazu Sugino
NKNoriaki Kanaya
Noriaki Kanaya
MMMasahito Mizuuchi
Masahito Mizuuchi
MNMasayasu Nakayama
Masayasu Nakayama
ANAkiyoshi Namiki
Akiyoshi Namiki


27 May 2015 in Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
THT. Hayase
T. Hayase
SSShigekazu Sugino
Shigekazu Sugino
HMH. Moriya
H. Moriya
MYM. Yamakage
M. Yamakage

22 August 2022 in JA Clinical Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKotoe Kamata
Kotoe Kamata
SASuguru Asagi
Suguru Asagi
YSYoshiteru Shimoda
Yoshiteru Shimoda
MKMasayuki Kanamori
Masayuki Kanamori
NANozomu Abe
Nozomu Abe
MYMASANORI YAMAUCHI
MASANORI YAMAUCHI
Background: Intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring reduces postoperative motor deficits. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is the gold standard for intraoperative myogenic MEPs. Although there is no contraindication to administering propofol in adults with peanut, soy, or egg allergies, its safety in children with these allergies remains unclear. Case presentation: A 12-year-old girl required general anesthesia under intraoperative direct cortical MEP (dc-MEP) monitoring due to supratentorial glioma. Remimazolam-based anesthesia was selected, instead of propofol, due to the patient’s egg hypersensitivity. Stable myogenic MEPs were recorded throughout the surgery with remimazolam at 0.9 mg/kg/h and remifentanil at 0.35 μg/kg/min, following adjustments of stimulation intensity and titration of remimazolam infusion. Neither intraoperative memory nor motor deficits were present after surgery. Conclusions: We present a pediatric case whose dc-MEP was recorded under remimazolam anesthesia. The cardiovascular stability and avoidance of propofol infusion syndrome with remimazolam were superior to propofol.