Raffaele Mauro

Prof. Dr. Raffaele Mauro


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

57Years (1970-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2016 in Expert Systems with Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSandro Chiappone
Sandro Chiappone
OGOrazio Giuffrè
Orazio Giuffrè
Anna GranàAnna Granà
Anna Granà
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro
Antonino SferlazzaAntonino Sferlazza
Antonino Sferlazza

1 April 2010 in Journal of Transportation Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro
FBFederico Branco
Federico Branco
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the traffic performances of turbo-roundabouts and roundabouts in terms of capacity and delays. We chose to use a recent German procedure for roundabouts included in “Kreisel” software as our calculation procedure to determine the capacity of turbo-roundabouts. We found that the capacities of turbo-roundabout secondary entries were higher than roundabout capacities when the traffic flow in the inner lane of the circle is high and the traffic flow in the outer lane of the circle is in the low to lower-middle range. On the contrary, the capacities of the main entries to roundabouts are always higher than the capacities of the main entries to turbo-roundabouts. Taking into account the arithmetic or weighted mean behavior of the four entries, the total capacities of turbo-roundabouts, at both saturated and undersaturated conditions, are, in most cases, higher than the total capacities of roundabouts. In most of the important practical situations analyzed, delays we...

1 January 2010
Verified
Book
Closed access
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro

1 January 2016 in Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tomaž TollazziTomaž Tollazzi
Tomaž Tollazzi
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro
MARCO GUERRIERIMARCO GUERRIERI
MARCO GUERRIERI
Marko RenčeljMarko Renčelj
Marko Renčelj
Comparative Analysis of Four New Alternative Types of Roundabouts: "Turbo", "Flower", "Target" and "Four-Flyover" Roundabout

10 March 2015 in The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro
MCMarco Cattani
Marco Cattani
MARCO GUERRIERIMARCO GUERRIERI
MARCO GUERRIERI
Turbo roundabouts are a particular road intersection layout, designed to increase the safety of double-lane roundabouts, while maintaining their excellent capacity. The main feature of this new concept of roundabout is the impossibility to move from one lane to another, provided by physical barriers marking the lanes. The paper shows an application to turbo roundabouts of a potential accident rate model, aiming to evaluate their safety improvement. Themodel is based on the concept of potential conflict: each vehicle involved in a general intersection performs a series of maneuvers which potentially imply a crash, according to the actual traffic. The number of accidents related to each critical maneuver is proportional to the number of times this maneuver occurs at the intersection. In order to define the critical maneuvers, and hence the relevant potential conflicts, specific crash typologies for roundabouts are adopted. Traffic volumes are required, to evaluate the expected number of accidents, and also probabilities of accident for every critical maneuver. These ratios were obtained by a model calibration, based on actual accident and traffic data recorded on conventional single and double-lane roundabouts. The model was then used to compare four-leg turbo roundabouts to conventional roundabouts. The comparisons have taken into account only basic differences in layout, such as geometric elements, that also play a role in determining safety performances of a roundabout. The results obtained show that turbo roundabouts significantly decrease the accident rate with respect to conventional roundabouts, by eliminating conflicts between circulating and exiting vehicles.

11 September 2013 in Modern Applied Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Raffaele MauroRaffaele Mauro
Raffaele Mauro
MLMario De Luca
Mario De Luca
GDGianluca Dell'Acqua
Gianluca Dell'Acqua
The study aims to develop a support procedure to estimate the efficacy of infrastructural interventions to improve road safety. The study was carried out on a 110 km stretch of the A3 highway, in southern Italy. Data from a huge sample concerning traffic, geometry and accidents for two periods of the same duration were compared, for which cluster analysis, and in particular, the “hard c means” binary partition algorithm was employed. Using cluster analysis, all the accidents with strong similarities were aggregated. Then for each cluster, the “cluster representative” accident was identified, to find the average among the various characteristics (geometrical, environmental, accident-related). A “hazard index” was also created for each cluster, whereby it was possible to establish the danger level for each “cluster”. Using this information, an accident prediction model using a multi-variate analysis was produced. This model was used as a support for decision-making on infrastructures and to simulate situations to which the Before-After technique could be applied.