Up to 30% of men with normal semen parameters suffer from infertility and the reason for this is unknown. Altered expression of sperm proteins may be a major cause of infertility in these men. Proteomic profiling was performed on pooled semen samples from eight normozoospermic fertile men and nine normozoospermic infertile men using LC-MS/MS. Furthermore, key differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) related to the fertilization process were selected for validation using Western blotting. A total of 1139 and 1095 proteins were identified in normozoospermic fertile and infertile men, respectively. Of these, 162 proteins were identified as DEPs. The canonical pathway related to free radical scavenging was enriched with upregulated DEPs in normozoospermic infertile men. The proteins associated with reproductive system development and function, and the ubiquitination pathway were underexpressed in normozoospermic infertile men. Western blot analysis revealed the overexpression of annexin A2 (ANXA2) (2.03 fold change; P = 0.0243), and underexpression of sperm surface protein Sp17 (SPA17) (0.37 fold change; P = 0.0205) and serine protease inhibitor (SERPINA5) (0.32 fold change; P = 0.0073) in men with unexplained male infertility (UMI). The global proteomic profile of normozoospermic infertile men is different from that of normozoospermic fertile men. Our data suggests that SPA17, ANXA2, and SERPINA5 may potentially serve as non-invasive protein biomarkers associated with the fertilization process of the spermatozoa in UMI.

The Pan-African bioinformatics network, H3ABioNet, comprises 27 research institutions in 17 African countries. H3ABioNet is part of the Human Health and Heredity in Africa program (H3Africa), an African-led research consortium funded by the US National Institutes of Health and the UK Wellcome Trust, aimed at using genomics to study and improve the health of Africans. A key role of H3ABioNet is to support H3Africa projects by building bioinformatics infrastructure such as portable and reproducible bioinformatics workflows for use on heterogeneous African computing environments. Processing and analysis of genomic data is an example of a big data application requiring complex interdependent data analysis workflows. Such bioinformatics workflows take the primary and secondary input data through several computationally-intensive processing steps using different software packages, where some of the outputs form inputs for other steps. Implementing scalable, reproducible, portable and easy-to-use workflows is particularly challenging. H3ABioNet has built four workflows to support (1) the calling of variants from high-throughput sequencing data; (2) the analysis of microbial populations from 16S rDNA sequence data; (3) genotyping and genome-wide association studies; and (4) single nucleotide polymorphism imputation. A week-long hackathon was organized in August 2016 with participants from six African bioinformatics groups, and US and European collaborators. Two of the workflows are built using the Common Workflow Language framework (CWL) and two using Nextflow. All the workflows are containerized for improved portability and reproducibility using Docker, and are publicly available for use by members of the H3Africa consortium and the international research community. The H3ABioNet workflows have been implemented in view of offering ease of use for the end user and high levels of reproducibility and portability, all while following modern state of the art bioinformatics data processing protocols. The H3ABioNet workflows will service the H3Africa consortium projects and are currently in use. All four workflows are also publicly available for research scientists worldwide to use and adapt for their respective needs. The H3ABioNet workflows will help develop bioinformatics capacity and assist genomics research within Africa and serve to increase the scientific output of H3Africa and its Pan-African Bioinformatics Network.

The H3ABioNet pan-African bioinformatics network, which is funded to support the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) program, has developed node-assessment exercises to gauge the ability of its participating research and service groups to analyze typical genome-wide datasets being generated by H3Africa research groups. We describe a framework for the assessment of computational genomics analysis skills, which includes standard operating procedures, training and test datasets, and a process for administering the exercise. We present the experiences of 3 research groups that have taken the exercise and the impact on their ability to manage complex projects. Finally, we discuss the reasons why many H3ABioNet nodes have declined so far to participate and potential strategies to encourage them to do so. Many programs have been developed to boost the technical and computational skills of scientists working in low to medium income countries (LMIC), who often struggle to remain competitive with their peers in more developed parts of the world. Typically, these programs rely on intensive workshops where students acquire and exercise these skills under the supervision of experienced trainers. However, when trainees return to their home institutions, even after extensive exposure to state of the art techniques, they often find it difficult to put the skills they have acquired into practice and to establish themselves as fully independent practitioners. We have attempted to build a framework through which teams of scientists in African research groups can demonstrate that they have acquired the necessary skills to analyze different types of genomic datasets. Three teams of scientists who have successfully submitted to this assessment exercise report their positive experiences. Many potential participants have so far declined the opportunity, and we discuss the reasons for their reluctance as well as possible ways to facilitate their engagement and provide them with incentives. We argue that assessments such as this could be part of any program aiming to develop technical skills in scientists wishing to support genomic research programs.

Https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27808 Abdulazeez Giwa, Azeez Fatai, Junaid Gamieldien, Alan Christoffels, Hocine Bendou

Chromosomal translocations and gene mutations are characteristics of the genomic profile of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aim to identify a gene signature associated with poor prognosis in AML patients with FLT3-ITD compared to AML patients with NPM1/CEBPA mutations. RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) count data were downloaded from the UCSC Xena browser. Samples were grouped by their mutation status into high and low-risk groups. Differential gene expression (DGE), machine learning (ML) and survival analyses were performed. A total of 471 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, of which 16 DEGs were used as features for the prediction of mutation status. An accuracy of 92% was obtained from the ML model. FHL1, SPNS3, and MPZL2 were found to be associated with overall survival in FLT3-ITD samples. FLT3-ITD mutation confers an indicative gene expression profile different from NPM1/CEBPA mutation, and the expression of FHL1, SPSN3, and MPZL2 can serve as prognostic indicators of unfavorable disease.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous type of blood cancer that generally affects the elderly. AML patients are categorized with favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risks based on an individual’s genomic features and chromosomal abnormalities. Despite the risk stratification, the progression and outcome of the disease remain highly variable. To facilitate and improve the risk stratification of AML patients, the study focused on gene expression profiling of AML patients within various risk categories. Therefore, the study aims to establish gene signatures that can predict the prognosis of AML patients and find correlations in gene expression profile patterns that are associated with risk groups.Methods: Microarray data were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE6891). The patients were stratified into four subgroups based on risk and overall survival. Limma was applied to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between short survival (SS) and long survival (LS). DEGs strongly related to general survival were discovered using Cox regression and LASSO analysis. To assess the model’s accuracy, Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were used. A one-way ANOVA was performed to assess for differences in the mean gene expression profiles of the identified prognostic genes between the risk subcategories and survival. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed on DEGs.Results: A total of 87 DEGs were identified between SS and LS groups. The Cox regression model selected nine genes CD109, CPNE3, DDIT4, INPP4B, LSP1, CPNE8, PLXNC1, SLC40A1, and SPINK2 that are associated with AML survival. K-M illustrated that the high expression of the nine-prognostic genes is associated with poor prognosis in AML. ROC further provided high diagnostic efficacy of the prognostic genes. ANOVA also validated the difference in gene expression profiles of the nine genes between the survival groups, and highlighted four prognostic genes to provide novel insight into risk subcategories poor and intermediate-poor, as well as good and intermediate-good that displayed similar expression patterns.Conclusion: Prognostic genes can provide more accurate risk stratification in AML. CD109, CPNE3, DDIT4, and INPP4B provided novel targets for better intermediate-risk stratification. This could enhance treatment strategies for this group, which constitutes the majority of adult AML patients.