Kentaro Jujo

Dr. Kentaro Jujo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2020 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMasaaki Konishi
Masaaki Konishi
NKNobuyuki Kagiyama
Nobuyuki Kagiyama
KKKentaro Kamiya
Kentaro Kamiya
HSHiroshi Saito
Hiroshi Saito
KSKazuya Saito
Kazuya Saito
YMYuya Matsue
Yuya Matsue
Sarcopenia, one of the extracardiac factors for reduced functional capacity and poor outcome in heart failure (HF), may act differently between HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We sought to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on mortality in HFpEF and HFrEF. We performed a post hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort study, including 942 consecutive older (age ≥65 years) hospitalized patients: 475 with HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥45%, age 81 ± 7 years, 48.8% men) and 467 with HFrEF (ejection fraction <45%, age 78 ± 8 years, 68.1% men). Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the international criteria incorporating muscle strength (handgrip strength), physical performance (gait speed), and skeletal muscle mass (appendicular skeletal mass). The HFpEF group consisted of fewer patients with low appendicular skeletal muscle mass index measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis [<7.0 kg/m2 (men) and <5.7 (women); 22.1% vs. 31.0%, P = 0.003], and more patients with low handgrip strength [<26 kg (men) and <18 (women); 67.8% vs. 55.5%, P < 0.001], and slow gait speed [<0.8 m/s (both sexes); 54.5% vs. 41.1%, P < 0.001] than the HFrEF group, resulting in a similar sarcopenia prevalence in the two groups (18.1% vs. 21.6%, P = 0.191). Sarcopenia was an independent predictor of 1-year mortality in both HFpEF and HFrEF [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.42 (1.36–4.32), P = 0.003 in HFpEF and 2.02 (1.08–3.75), P = 0.027 in HFrEF; P for interaction = 0.666] after adjustment for other predictors. In older patients with HF, sarcopenia contributes to mortality similarly in HFpEF and HFrEF.

31 March 2016 in ESC Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKentaro Jujo
Kentaro Jujo
KSKatsumi Saito
Katsumi Saito
IIIssei Ishida
Issei Ishida
YFYuho Furuki
Yuho Furuki
AKAhsung Kim
Ahsung Kim
NHNobuhisa Hagiwara
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Aims Loop diuretics are first‐line medications for congestive heart failure (CHF); however, they are associated with serious adverse effects, including decreased renal function, and sympathetic nervous and renin–angiotensin system activation. We tested whether tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2‐receptor antagonist, could reduce unfavourable furosemide‐induced effects during CHF treatment. Methods and results Sixty patients emergently hospitalized owing to CHF‐induced dyspnea were randomly assigned to receive either 40 mg intravenous furosemide daily or 7.5 mg oral tolvaptan for 5 days after admission. Both groups also received intravenous carperitide and canrenoate potassium. As results, baseline patient characteristics were similar between the furosemide (n = 30) and the tolvaptan (n = 30) groups, with no significant difference in 5 day urine volume or fluid balance. Brain natriuretic peptide and body weight improvements were similar between groups. However, serum creatinine (Cr) level did not increase, and the incidence of worsening renal function was significantly lower in the tolvaptan group. Consequently, the Cr increase to gain 1000 mL urine was 2.5‐fold lower in the tolvaptan group. Furthermore, the blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Cr ratio significantly decreased in the tolvaptan group, suggesting that renal perfusion was preserved, and urea reuptake and passive water reabsorption were suppressed following tolvaptan treatment. Although catecholamine improvements after treatment were not significantly different, plasma renin activity was enhanced in the furosemide group. Conclusions As compared with furosemide, tolvaptan in patients with acute heart failure is associated with comparable decongestion, better preservation of renal function and less activation of renin–angiotensin system. (UMIN 000014134).

27 June 2017 in ESC Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KJKentaro Jujo
Kentaro Jujo
YMYuichiro Minami
Yuichiro Minami
SHShintaro Haruki
Shintaro Haruki
YMYuya Matsue
Yuya Matsue
KSKensuke Shimazaki
Kensuke Shimazaki
NHNobuhisa Hagiwara
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Aims The association between kinetics of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels in hospital and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acutely decompensated congestive heart failure (HF) is unclear. We aimed to estimate the impact of changes in BUN level during hospitalization on clinical prognosis in patients with acute HF. Methods and results A total of 353 consecutive patients that were urgently hospitalized due to acutely decompensated HF and discharged alive were divided into four subgroups depending on their BUN level at admission and discharge, using a cut‐off level of 21.0 mg/dL. Among 206 patients with high baseline BUN level, 46 (22%) and 160 (78%) had normal and persistent high BUN levels at discharge, respectively. In contrast, of the 147 patients with normal baseline BUN level, 55 (37%) and 92 (63%) had high and normal BUN levels at discharge, respectively. During the observational period after discharge, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed the highest rate of combined outcome of cardiovascular death and HF readmission in patients with persistent high BUN (log‐rank test: P < 0.001). After adjustment for comorbidities, the hazard ratio for a combined outcome was significantly lower in patients with normalized BUN level compared with those with persistent high BUN (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.99, P = 0.049). Conclusions Persistent high BUN levels in hospital are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death and HF readmission. Normalization of BUN levels during hospitalization may be associated with long‐term clinical outcomes.

21 November 2023 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YYYugo Yamashita
Yugo Yamashita
TMTakeshi Morimoto
Takeshi Morimoto
NMNao Muraoka
Nao Muraoka
TOTakuya Oyakawa
Takuya Oyakawa
MUMichihisa Umetsu
Michihisa Umetsu
OIon behalf of the ONCO DVT Study Investigators
on behalf of the ONCO DVT Study Investigators
BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with cancer is clinically relevant, but the evidence is lacking. The prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 60 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, in a 1-to-1 ratio, to receive either a 12-month or 3-month edoxaban treatment. The primary end point was a composite of a symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death at 12 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 12 months, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that a 12-month edoxaban treatment was superior to a 3-month edoxaban treatment with respect to the primary end point. RESULTS: From April 2019 through June 2022, 604 patients were randomized, and after excluding 3 patients who withdrew consent, 601 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population: 296 patients in the 12-month edoxaban group and 305 patients in the 3-month edoxaban group. The mean age was 70.8 years, 28% of the patients were men, and 20% of the patients had symptoms of deep vein thrombosis at baseline. The primary end point of a symptomatic recurrent VTE event or VTE-related death occurred in 3 of the 296 patients (1.0%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03–0.44). The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 28 of the 296 patients (9.5%) in the 12-month edoxaban group and in 22 of the 305 patients (7.2%) in the 3-month edoxaban group (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.75–2.41). The prespecified subgroups did not affect the estimates on the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer with isolated distal deep vein thrombosis, 12 months was superior to 3 months for an edoxaban treatment with respect to the composite outcome of a symptomatic recurrent VTE or VTE-related death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03895502.

1 January 2024 in Korean Circulation Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDaichi Maeda
Daichi Maeda
YFYudai Fujimoto
Yudai Fujimoto
TNTaisuke Nakade
Taisuke Nakade
TATakuro Abe
Takuro Abe
SIShiro Ishihara
Shiro Ishihara
YMYuya Matsue
Yuya Matsue
Maeda D, et al. Korean Circ J. 2024 Apr;54:e51. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0089

29 July 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KMKeiko Mizobuchi
Keiko Mizobuchi
KJKentaro Jujo
Kentaro Jujo
YMYuichiro Minami
Yuichiro Minami
IIIssei Ishida
Issei Ishida
MNMasashi Nakao
Masashi Nakao
NHNobuhisa Hagiwara
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Introduction: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) occurs at an advanced stage of atherosclerosis and its comorbidities are associated with poor prognoses. Malnutrition is related to the severity of atherosclerosis in patients with cardiovascular disease and it predicts mortality. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is calculated from serum albumin concentration, peripheral lymphocyte count and total cholesterol concentration, and it robustly represents the nutritional status of hospitalized patients. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the CONUT score in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) who were undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT). METHODS and RESULTS: This study included 628 PAD patients who underwent EVT between 2013 and 2017 and were assigned to low (CONUT score 0: n = 81), mild (CONUT score 1–2: n = 250), moderate (CONUT score 3–4: n = 169), and high (CONUT score ≥ 5: n = 128) risk groups. The study’s primary endpoint was any death. Patients in the groups with higher CONUT scores were more likely to have chronic kidney disease (p < 0.001), impaired left ventricular ejection fractions (p < 0.001), and critical limb ischemia (p < 0.001) on admission. During follow-up, 95 patients (15%) died. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed that the patients with higher CONUT scores had lower survival rates (p < 0.001; log-rank trend test). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that following adjustments for the confounding factors, a higher CONUT score was significantly associated with any death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.30). CONCLUSION: The simple index CONUT score at the time of EVT may predict long-term mortality in PAD patients.