Bernhard Munk

Mr. Bernhard Munk

Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2010 in Bioresource Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HPHerbert Pobeheim
Herbert Pobeheim
BMBernhard Munk
Bernhard Munk
JJJohan Johansson
Johan Johansson
GGGeorg M. Guebitz
Georg M. Guebitz

1 January 2011 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HPHerbert Pobeheim
Herbert Pobeheim
BMBernhard Munk
Bernhard Munk
HLHarald Lindorfer
Harald Lindorfer
GGGeorg M. Guebitz
Georg M. Guebitz

20 May 2014 in Energy, Sustainability and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Michael LebuhnMichael Lebuhn
Michael Lebuhn
BMBernhard Munk
Bernhard Munk
MEMathias Effenberger
Mathias Effenberger
Worldwide, anaerobic digestion for sanitation and utilization of the produced biogas as energy carrier have a long-standing history. Concomitantly, digested residues from biogas plants are utilized as valuable fertilizers in crop production. In Germany, guaranteed prices for electricity generated from renewable sources pushed the number of biogas plants from about 140 in 1992 to about 7,720 by the end of 2013, and the share of electricity supply from biogas close to 4.5%. In the midterm, biogas is given considerable potential to fill up the residual load from electricity generation based on wind and photovoltaic. In this review, we give an overview of the state-of-the-art of biogas technology for energy supply from agricultural inputs, based mainly on the situation in Germany. Focus is placed on the monitoring and control (M&C) of biogas plants as a means of meeting the growing demands for productivity and reliability of biogas supply. We summarize prominent factors for the stability and productivity of the anaerobic digestion (AD) process, and present latest findings about molecular biology tools, bioindicators, the ‘metabolic quotient’ and cDNA/DNA ratios for process analysis. In view of the large diversity of agricultural biogas installations, we discuss the cost-benefit ratio of M&C effort and equipment. In the light of the transformation of the energy system in Germany towards renewable sources (‘Energiewende’), we give an outlook on prospects and concepts for the future role of biogas technology in agriculture and energy supply. We also address recent misguided developments, as the sustainable development of biogas technology in agriculture can only be realized within the ecological, economical, and social boundaries of underlying agro-ecological systems.

16 December 2010 in Engineering in Life Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMBernhard Munk
Bernhard Munk
CBChristoph Bauer
Christoph Bauer
AGAndreas Gronauer
Andreas Gronauer
Michael LebuhnMichael Lebuhn
Michael Lebuhn


1 December 2012 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BMBernhard Munk
Bernhard Munk
CBC. Bauer
C. Bauer
AGA. Gronauer
A. Gronauer
Michael LebuhnMichael Lebuhn
Michael Lebuhn
Biogas production from renewable resources is an alternative to generate energy and concomitantly save fossil fuels and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. As methanogenesis is a major bottleneck in the biogas process, the determination of the specific activity of methanogenic Archaea can be a good indicator of the process state. A new parameter, the metabolic quotient (MQ), was developed to evaluate the specific activity of methanogens. A standard was created from mesophilic maize-fed fermenters to calculate the expected concentration of methanogens for a given methane productivity at stable process stages. The MQ, the ratio of the predicted to the actual concentration of methanogens, defines their metabolic activity. The MQ was able to indicate methanogenic cell stress metabolism and imminent process failure before conventional chemical parameters. As a further approach, the methanogenic activity was determined by quantification of mRNA transcripts in relation to the mcrA/mrtA-gene, coding for a key enzyme subunit of methanogenesis. The cDNA/DNA ratio reflected the specific actual process activity of the methanogens. As both methods are potent parameters for the early detection of process failure, biogas plant operators may avoid economical losses by their preventive application.