Bram Vanderborght

Prof. Bram Vanderborght

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building Z - Room ZW105b, Pleinlaan, 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2013 in Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Bram VanderborghtBram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght
AAA. Albu-Schaeffer
A. Albu-Schaeffer
ABA. Bicchi
A. Bicchi
EBE. Burdet
E. Burdet
Darwin G. CaldwellDarwin G. Caldwell
Darwin G. Caldwell
SWS. Wolf
S. Wolf

1 September 2009 in IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRonald Ham
Ronald Ham
TSThomas Sugar
Thomas Sugar
Bram VanderborghtBram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght
KHKevin Hollander
Kevin Hollander
DLDirk Lefeber
Dirk Lefeber
In the growing fields of wearable robotics, rehabilitation robotics, prosthetics, and walking k robots, variable stiffness actuators (VSAs) or adjustable compliant actuators are being designed and implemented because of their ability to minimize large forces due to shocks, to safely interact with the user, and their ability to store and release energy in passive elastic elements. This review article describes the state of the art in the design of actuators with adaptable passive compliance. This new type of actuator is not preferred for classical position-controlled applications such as pick and place operations but is preferred in novel robots where safe human- robot interaction is required or in applications where energy efficiency must be increased by adapting the actuator's resonance frequency. The working principles of the different existing designs are explained and compared. The designs are divided into four groups: equilibrium-controlled stiffness, antagonistic-controlled stiffness, structure-controlled stiffness (SCS), and mechanically controlled stiffness.

16 August 2017 in Science Robotics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
STSeppe Terryn
Seppe Terryn
Joost BrancartJoost Brancart
Joost Brancart
DLDirk Lefeber
Dirk Lefeber
GAGuy Van Assche
Guy Van Assche
Bram VanderborghtBram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght
Soft robots manufactured out of self-healing polymers have the ability to repair macroscopic damage.

1 October 2007 in Robotics and Autonomous Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRonald Van Ham
Ronald Van Ham
Bram VanderborghtBram Vanderborght
Bram Vanderborght
MDMichaël Van Damme
Michaël Van Damme
BVBjörn Verrelst
Björn Verrelst
DLDirk Lefeber
Dirk Lefeber

31 August 2021 in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRenée Govaerts
Renée Govaerts
BTBruno Tassignon
Bruno Tassignon
JGJo Ghillebert
Jo Ghillebert
BSBen Serrien
Ben Serrien
SBSander De Bock
Sander De Bock
KPKevin De Pauw
Kevin De Pauw
Objective: Over the course of the twenty-first century, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are still persisting among blue collar workers. At present, no epidemiological overview exists. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on the epidemiology of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) within Europe’s secondary industries. Methods: Five databases were screened, yielding 34 studies for the qualitative analysis and 17 for the quantitative analysis. Twelve subgroups of WMSDs were obtained for the meta-analysis by means of predefined inclusion criteria: back (overall), upper back, lower back, neck, shoulder, neck/shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, leg (overall), hip, knee, and ankle/feet. Results: The most prevalent WMSDs were located at the back (overall), shoulder/neck, neck, shoulder, lower back and wrist WMSDs with mean 12-month prevalence values of 60, 54, 51, 50, 47, and 42%, respectively. The food industry was in the majority of subgroups the most prominent researched sector and was frequently associated with high prevalence values of WMSDs. Incidence ratios of upper limb WMSDs ranged between 0.04 and 0.26. Incidence ratios could not be calculated for other anatomical regions due to the lack of sufficient articles. Conclusion: WMSDs are still highly present among blue collar workers. Relatively high prevalence values and low incidence ratios indicate a limited onset of WMSDs with however long-term complaints.

17 March 2015 in The International Journal of Robotics Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Giorgio GrioliGiorgio Grioli
Giorgio Grioli
SWSebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf
MGManolo Garabini
Manolo Garabini
MCManuel Catalano
Manuel Catalano
EBEtienne Burdet
Etienne Burdet
ABAntonio Bicchi
Antonio Bicchi
Since their introduction in the early years of this century, variable stiffness actuators (VSA) witnessed a sustained growth of interest in the research community, as shown by the growing number of publications. While many consider VSA very interesting for applications, one of the factors hindering their further diffusion is the relatively new conceptual structure of this technology. When choosing a VSA for their application, educated practitioners, who are used to choosing robot actuators based on standardized procedures and uniformly presented data, would be confronted with an inhomogeneous and rather disorganized mass of information coming mostly from scientific publications. In this paper, the authors consider how the design procedures and data presentation of a generic VSA could be organized so as to minimize the engineer’s effort in choosing the actuator type and size that would best fit the application needs. The reader is led through the list of the most important parameters that will determine the ultimate performance of their VSA robot, and influence both the mechanical design and the controller shape. This set of parameters extends the description of a traditional electric actuator with quantities describing the capability of the VSA to change its output stiffness. As an instrument for the end-user, the VSA datasheet is intended to be a compact, self-contained description of an actuator that summarizes all of the salient characteristics that the user must be aware of when choosing a device for their application. At the end some examples of compiled VSA datasheets are reported, as well as a few examples of actuator selection procedures.