Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability, and disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) could represent a pivotal advancement in treatment. Identifying the potential of antidiabetic medications as DMOADs could impact patient care significantly. We designed a comprehensive analysis pipeline involving two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) (genetic proxies for antidiabetic drug targets), summary-based MR (SMR) (for mRNA), and colocalisation (for drug-target genes) to assess their causal relationship with 12 osteoarthritis phenotypes. Summary statistics from the largest genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) of osteoarthritis and gene expression data from the eQTLGen consortium were utilised. Seven out of eight major types of clinical antidiabetic medications were identified, resulting in fourteen potential drug targets. Sulfonylurea targets ABCC8/KCNJ11 were associated with increased osteoarthritis risk at any site (odds ratio (OR): 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-2.84, P < 3 × 10^-4), while PPARG, influenced by thiazolidinediones (TZDs), was associated with decreased risk of hand (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48-0.76, P < 3 × 10^-4), finger (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.35-0.73, P < 3 × 10^-4), and thumb (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.34-0.71, P < 3 × 10^-4) osteoarthritis. Metformin and GLP1-RA, targeting GPD1 and GLP1R respectively, were associated with reduced risk of knee and finger osteoarthritis. In the SMR analyses, gene expression of KCNJ11, GANAB, ABCA1, and GSTP1, targeted by antidiabetic drugs, was significantly linked to at least one osteoarthritis phenotype and was replicated across at least two gene expression datasets. Additionally, increased KCNJ11 expression was related to decreased osteoarthritis risk and co-localised with at least one osteoarthritis phenotype. Our findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for antidiabetic drugs in treating osteoarthritis. The results indicate that certain antidiabetic drug targets may modify disease progression, with implications for developing targeted DMOADs. This study was funded by the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant (2022), the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission Health Industry Clinical Research Project (Grant No. 20224Y0139), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 7244458), and the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (Grade C) of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. GZC20230130).

Vertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs) are one of the most difficult fractures to stabilize, with high non-union (17%), avascular necrosis (AVN, 21%), and femoral neck shortening (FNS, 29.0%) rates. The objective of this investigation was to directly compare the long-term clinical complication rates of VFNFs repaired by crossed (Alpha fixation) or parallel screws in non-geriatric patients. We conducted a retrospective comparative study of VFNFs in patients (<60 years) between January 2014 and December 2017, with at least 2 years of follow-up. VFNFs were fixed with either three parallel screws (G-TRI) or augmented with a crossed screw (G-ALP). Confounding variables included age, gender, initial displacement, ISS (Injury Severity Score), general comorbidities, combined fractures, Pauwels angle, reduction quality. Complications, including non-union, AVN of the femoral head and FNS were compared as outcome indicators. Risk factors associated with these variables were further analysed using multivariate analysis. A total of 157 patients (97 G-TRI; 60 G-ALP) met inclusion criteria. G-ALP had a significantly lower rate of FNS (8.3% vs. 28.9%, p = 0.039) than that of G-TRI. non-union (3.3% vs. 11.3%), AVN (21.7% vs. 25.8%), and reoperation rates (21.7% vs. 23.7%) were lower in G-ALP than G-TRI but was not statistically significant. Multivariate analyses showed significant relationships between NU and unacceptable reduction quality (OR=7.610; 1.823-31.770, adjusted-p = 0.015); between AVN and initial displacement (Garden III and IV) (OR=7.885; 1.739-35.744, adjusted-p = 0.021); and between FNS and screw configuration (OR=5.713; 1.839-17.743, adjusted-p = 0.009). For the treatment of VFNFs, satisfactory reduction still remains the key surgical goal that prevents NU, while the incidence of AVN strongly depends on the initial displacement at the time of injury. Crossed screws were associated with a markedly lower FNS rate than parallel screws, which promote further randomised controlled trials to establish a guideline for optimal fixation selection in VFNFs.

Background: The optimal internal fixation strategy for vertical femoral neck fractures (VFNFs) in nongeriatric patients remains uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the clinical prognoses and underlying mechanical characteristics of a novel off-axis screw technique with dynamic hip screws (DHSs) and three traditional parallel screws. Methods: This study included a clinical investigation and a patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA). In the clinical investigation, VFNF patients were grouped by fixation type: (1) use of three parallel screws (G-TRI); (2) augmentation with an off-axis screw (G-ALP); and (3) DHS with an anti-rotational screw (G-DHS). Fixation failures (nonunion, femoral neck shortening (FNS), varus deformation, screw cut-out) and avascular necrosis (AVN) consequent to the three types of fixations were compared. In the FEA, twenty-four fixation models with the three fixation types were created based on the data of eight healthy volunteers. Models were assessed under walking conditions. Stiffness, interfragmentary motion (IFM), and implant stress were evaluated. Results: In the clinical investigation, the fixation failure rate was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in G-ALP (18.5%) than in G-DHS (37.5%) and G-TRI (39.3%). No significant difference in AVN was observed among the three fixation groups. In the FEA, stiffness and implant stress in the G-DHS models were significantly (p < 0.05) higher, and the IFM of G-ALP was significantly (p < 0.05) lower among the groups. Conclusions: Among fixation types for VFNFs, the off-axis screw technique exhibited better interfragmentary stability (lowest IFM) and a lower fixation failure rate (especially FNS). Analyzing interfragmentary stability in biomechanical experiments is more consistent with clinical prognosis than construct stability for VFNFs, suggesting that internal fixations should aim for this outcome.

Background: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) remains a major cause of disability in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and seriously impairs quality of life. This study aimed to investigate associations between glucocorticoids (GCs), antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), and ONFH in patients with SLE. Methods: We conducted a multicentre cohort study on patients with SLE and used a directed acyclic graph-based analysis strategy. Details of GC therapy, aPLs status, other drug administration and other SLE-related characteristics were collected. ONFH occurrence during follow-up was determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized estimating equation models were performed to assess their effects on ONFH, and a simplified scoring system comprising these factors for short- and medium-term SLE-ONFH prediction was developed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Of 449 SLE patients with a median follow-up duration of 5.3 years, 41 (9.1%) developed ONFH. Independently risk factors of SLE-ONFH including: average daily GC dose with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.1 and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.0–1.1; GC therapy duration (3–5 years: aOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4–7.8; >5 years: aOR 8.0, 95% CI 3.3–19.4); initial intravenous GC (aOR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9–10.1); positive aPLs (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4–5.8); and Arterial hypertension secondary to GC usage (aOR 5.2, 95% CI 1.4–19.1). And we successfully developed the simplified scoring system (SCORE model) with an area under the curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.82–0.94). Conclusion: Based on the risk factors involved in the development of SLE-ONFH, a novel SCORE model was developed, which might be helpful for risk stratification of SLE-ONFH in clinical practice.

Background: The early recovery of hip function after hip fracture surgery values more attention, especially for patients with delayed surgery of longer than 48 h. We aim to evaluate the associations of in-hospital surgical waiting time with the functional outcomes [Harris Hip Score (HHS), Parker Mobility Score (PMS), and EuroQol 5 dimensions VAS (visual analogue scale) score (EQ-5D VAS)] in elderly patients who sustained hip fractures. Materials and methods: Data on sociodemographic and clinical factors were prospectively collected using a multicenter hip fracture registry system. Participants in the cohort underwent a 12-month follow-up investigation. After adjusting potential confounders identified by the directed acyclic graphs, the associations between surgical waiting time longer than 48 h and functional outcomes were estimated by log-binomial regression and multivariable linear regression models with generalized estimating equations. Results: Of 863 survival participants with available functional data at 12 months after surgery, an increased risk was obtained from receiving surgery after 48 h and the poor functional outcomes (HHS<80: relative risk (RR)=1.56, 95% CI: 1.00–2.51; PMS<7: RR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.13–2.01; EQ-5D VAS<80: RR=1.97, 95% CI: 1.57–2.47). In-hospital waiting time greater than 48 h were time-invariantly associated with lower PMS during recovery (−0.44 units 95% CI: −0.70 to −0.18). In addition, delayed surgery was time-varying associated with HHS and EQ-5D VAS. Conclusions: The associations between in-hospital waiting time and postoperative functional score suggest that delayed surgery can lead to poor functional outcomes, especially in patients waiting longer than 72 h from injury. Delayed surgery mainly impacted hip function and mobility recovery with a slower speed in early recovery of the first 3 months. More attention should be paid to mechanisms behind the associations between delayed surgery on general healthy status.