Amy Bennett

Amy Bennett


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2015 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAmy Bennett
Amy Bennett
NMNathan G. McDowell
Nathan G. McDowell
CACraig D. Allen
Craig D. Allen
KAKristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira

25 September 2014 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
SDStuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies
ABAmy Bennett
Amy Bennett
EGErika B. Gonzalez‐Akre
Erika B. Gonzalez‐Akre
HMHelene C. Muller‐Landau
Helene C. Muller‐Landau
JZJess Zimmerman
Jess Zimmerman

22 May 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMartin Sullivan
Martin Sullivan
SLSimon L. Lewis
Simon L. Lewis
KAKofi Affum-Baffoe
Kofi Affum-Baffoe
CCCarolina Castilho
Carolina Castilho
FCFlávia Capellotto Costa
Flávia Capellotto Costa
OPOliver L. Phillips
Oliver L. Phillips
Thermal sensitivity of tropical trees: A key uncertainty in climate change models is the thermal sensitivity of tropical forests and how this value might influence carbon fluxes. Sullivan et al. measured carbon stocks and fluxes in permanent forest plots distributed globally. This synthesis of plot networks across climatic and biogeographic gradients shows that forest thermal sensitivity is dominated by high daytime temperatures. This extreme condition depresses growth rates and shortens the time that carbon resides in the ecosystem by killing trees under hot, dry conditions. The effect of temperature is worse above 32°C, and a greater magnitude of climate change thus risks greater loss of tropical forest carbon stocks. Nevertheless, forest carbon stocks are likely to remain higher under moderate climate change if they are protected from direct impacts such as clearance, logging, or fires. Science , this issue p. 869

4 September 2023 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAmy Bennett
Amy Bennett
TSThaiane Rodrigues de Sousa
Thaiane Rodrigues de Sousa
AMAbel Monteagudo-Mendoza
Abel Monteagudo-Mendoza
AEAdriane Esquivel-Muelbert
Adriane Esquivel-Muelbert
PMPaulo S. Morandi
Paulo S. Morandi
OPOliver L. Phillips
Oliver L. Phillips
The tropical forest carbon sink is known to be drought sensitive, but it is unclear which forests are the most vulnerable to extreme events. Forests with hotter and drier baseline conditions may be protected by prior adaptation, or more vulnerable because they operate closer to physiological limits. Here we report that forests in drier South American climates experienced the greatest impacts of the 2015–2016 El Niño, indicating greater vulnerability to extreme temperatures and drought. The long-term, ground-measured tree-by-tree responses of 123 forest plots across tropical South America show that the biomass carbon sink ceased during the event with carbon balance becoming indistinguishable from zero (−0.02 ± 0.37 Mg C ha−1 per year). However, intact tropical South American forests overall were no more sensitive to the extreme 2015–2016 El Niño than to previous less intense events, remaining a key defence against climate change as long as they are protected.

17 May 2021 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAmy Bennett
Amy Bennett
GDGreta C. Dargie
Greta C. Dargie
ACAida Cuni-Sanchez
Aida Cuni-Sanchez
JMJohn Tshibamba Mukendi
John Tshibamba Mukendi
WHWannes Hubau
Wannes Hubau
SLSimon L. Lewis
Simon L. Lewis
The responses of tropical forests to environmental change are critical uncertainties in predicting the future impacts of climate change. The positive phase of the 2015–2016 El Niño Southern Oscillation resulted in unprecedented heat and low precipitation in the tropics with substantial impacts on the global carbon cycle. The role of African tropical forests is uncertain as their responses to short-term drought and temperature anomalies have yet to be determined using on-the-ground measurements. African tropical forests may be particularly sensitive because they exist in relatively dry conditions compared with Amazonian or Asian forests, or they may be more resistant because of an abundance of drought-adapted species. Here, we report responses of structurally intact old-growth lowland tropical forests inventoried within the African Tropical Rainforest Observatory Network (AfriTRON). We use 100 long-term inventory plots from six countries each measured at least twice prior to and once following the 2015–2016 El Niño event. These plots experienced the highest temperatures and driest conditions on record. The record temperature did not significantly reduce carbon gains from tree growth or significantly increase carbon losses from tree mortality, but the record drought did significantly decrease net carbon uptake. Overall, the long-term biomass increase of these forests was reduced due to the El Niño event, but these plots remained a live biomass carbon sink (0.51 ± 0.40 Mg C ha−1 y−1) despite extreme environmental conditions. Our analyses, while limited to African tropical forests, suggest they may be more resistant to climatic extremes than Amazonian and Asian forests. Significance The responses of tropical forests to heat and drought are critical uncertainties in predicting the future impacts of climate change. The 2015–2016 El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) resulted in unprecedented heat and low precipitation across the tropics, including in the very poorly studied African tropical forest region. We assess African forest ENSO responses using on-the-ground measurements. Across 100 long-term plots, record high temperatures did not significantly reduce carbon gains from tree growth or significantly increase carbon losses from tree mortality. Overall, despite the climate anomaly, forests continued to gain live biomass over the ENSO period. Our analyses, while limited to African tropical forests, suggest that they may be more resistant to climate extremes than Amazonian and Asian forests.

8 June 2015 in Functional Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson‐Teixeira
JMJennifer C. McGarvey
Jennifer C. McGarvey
HMHelene C. Muller‐Landau
Helene C. Muller‐Landau
JPJanice Y. Park
Janice Y. Park
EGErika B. Gonzalez‐Akre
Erika B. Gonzalez‐Akre
WMWilliam J. McShea
William J. McShea