Once temozolomide has failed, no other treatment is recommended for pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumors. Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has raised hope, but so far, only one corticotroph carcinoma and one aggressive corticotroph tumor treated with immunotherapies have been reported in the literature. Here, we present two cases, one corticotroph carcinoma and one aggressive prolactinoma (the first one reported in the literature) treated with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every three weeks, followed by maintenance treatment with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) in the case of the corticotroph carcinoma, and we compare them with the two previously reported cases. Patient #1 presented a biochemical partial response (plasma ACTH decreased from 13,813 to 841 pg/mL) and dissociated radiological response to the combined ipilimumab and nivolumab—the pituitary mass decreased from 37 × 32 × 41 to 29 × 23 × 42 mm, and the pre-existing liver metastases decreased in size (the largest one from 45 to 14 mm) or disappeared, while a new 11-mm liver metastasis appeared. The maintenance nivolumab (21 cycles) resulted in a stable disease for the initial liver metastases, and in progressive disease for the newly appeared metastasis (effectively treated with radiofrequency ablation) and the pituitary mass. Patient #2 presented radiological and biochemical progressive disease after two cycles of ICIs—the pituitary mass increased from 38 × 42 × 26 to 53 × 57 × 44 mm, and the prolactin levels increased from 4410 to 9840 ng/mL. In conclusion, ICIs represent a promising therapeutic option for aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas. The identification of subgroups of responders will be key.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) includes resident and infiltrative non-tumor cells, as well as blood and lymph vessels, extracellular matrix molecules, and numerous soluble factors, such as cytokines and chemokines. While the TME is now considered to be a prognostic tool and a therapeutic target for many cancers, little is known about its composition in pituitary tumors. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the TME within pituitary tumors and the strong interest in TME as a therapeutic target. While we cover the importance of angiogenesis and immune infiltrating cells, we also address the role of the elusive folliculostellate cells, the emerging literature on pituitary tumor-associated fibroblasts, and the contribution of extracellular matrix components in these tumors. The cases of human pituitary tumors treated with TME-targeting therapies are reviewed and emerging concepts of vascular normalization and combined therapies are presented. Together, this snapshot overview of the current literature pinpoints not only the underestimated role of TME components in pituitary tumor biology, but also the major promise it may offer for both prognosis and targeted therapeutics.

Purpose Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) are frequent intracranial neoplasms that present heterogenic characteristics. Little is known about the immune cell network that exists in PitNETs and its contribution to their aggressive behaviour. Methods Here we combined flow cytometry, t-SNE analysis and histological approaches to define the immune landscape of surgically resected-PitNETs. Xenografts of rodent pituitary tumour-cells and resected PitNETs were performed in Rag2KO mice, in combination with in vitro analysis aimed at dissecting the role of pituitary tumour-cells in monocyte recruitment. Results We report that gonadotroph-PitNETs present an increased CD68⁺ macrophage signature compared to somatotroph-, lactotroph- and corticotroph-PitNETs. Transcriptomic and histological characterisations confirmed gonadotroph infiltrating macrophages expressed CD163, MRC-1, ARG1 and CSF1R M2-macrophage markers. Use of GH3/GH4 somatotroph- and LβT2/αT3.1 gonadotroph-cells drove THP1 macrophage migration through respective expression of CCL5 or CSF1. Although both LβT2 and GH3 cells recruited F4/80 macrophages following their engraftment in mice, only LβT2-gonadotroph cells showed a capacity for M2-like polarisation. Similar observations were performed on patient-derived xenografts from somatotroph- and gonadotroph-tumours. Analysis of clinical data further demonstrated a significant correlation between the percentage of CD68⁺ and CD163⁺ infiltrating macrophages and the invasive character of gonadotroph-tumours. Conclusions Gonadotroph-tumours drive the recruitment of macrophages and their subsequent polarisation to an M2-like phenotype. More importantly, the association between infiltrating CD68⁺/CD163⁺ macrophages and invasiveness of gonadotroph-tumours points to macrophage-targeted immunotherapies being a potent strategy to limit the progression of gonadotroph-PitNETs.

Objective: After temozolomide failure, no evidence-based treatment is available for pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs). To date, only 12 cases treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been published, showing encouraging efficacy. Predictive factors of response are lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the real-life efficacy and predictors of response to ICIs in PCs and APTs. Design and methods: This study is a multicentric, retrospective, observational cohort study, including all PCs and APTs treated with ICIs in France up to March 2022. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry and CD8+ T cell infiltration were evaluated centrally. Results: Six PCs (four corticotroph and two lactotroph) and nine APTs (five corticotroph and four lactotroph) were included. The real-life efficacy of ICIs was lower than previously published data. Three corticotroph tumors (33.3%) showed partial response, one (11.1%) stable disease, while five (55.6%) progressed. One lactotroph tumor (16.7%) showed partial response, one (16.7%) stable disease, while four (66.7%) progressed. PCs responded far better than APTs, with 4/6 PCs showing partial response compared to 0/9 APTs. Corticotroph tumors responded slightly better than lactotroph tumors. In the four responsive corticotroph tumors, PD-L1 staining was negative and CD8+ T cell infiltration attained a maximum of 1% in the tumor center. Conclusions: Confirmation of the presence or absence of metastases is necessary before starting ICIs. After temozolomide failure, ICIs appear as a good therapeutic option for PCs, especially for corticotroph carcinomas. Negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ T cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas. Significance statement: This is the first study to assess the real-life efficacy of ICIs in pituitary carcinomas (PCs) and aggressive pituitary tumors. We also assessed potential predictors of response and are the first to assess the predictive value of CD8+ cell infiltration. We identified the tumor type as a major predictor, ICIs proving far more effective in treating PCs. Our study provides evidence that ICIs are a good option after temozolomide failure for PCs (four of six responded), especially for corticotroph carcinomas (three of four responded). We also provide evidence that negative PD-L1 staining and very low CD8+ cell infiltration in the tumor center should not preclude ICI administration in corticotroph carcinomas. Moreover, our findings point toward the need to systematically perform extension workup before starting ICIs.

Context Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the cornerstone medical treatments for acromegaly; however, many patients remain unresponsive to SRLs. Well-established predictive markers of response are needed. Objective We aimed to explore the relationship between responsiveness to SRLs relative to somatostatin (SST)2A and 5 receptor expression, adenoma granularity, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity (T2WSI). Methods We conducted a multicentric, prospective, observational cohort study, in France. Forty-nine naïve patients (ie, patients without preoperative SRL treatment) with active acromegaly following surgery were treated with octreotide (group 1; n = 47), or pasireotide if uncontrolled under first-generation SRLs (group 2; n = 9). Data were collected at baseline and months 3 and 6. Biochemical measurements, immunohistochemistry studies, and MRI readings were centralized. Results In group 1, IGF-I decrease from baseline to month 6 positively correlated with SST2A immunoreactive score (IRS), P = 0.01. Densely granulated/intermediate adenomas had a greater IGF-I and GH decrease under octreotide compared with sparsely granulated adenomas (P = 0.02 and P = 0.006, respectively), and expressed greater levels of SST2A (P < 0.001), coupled with lower levels of SST5 (P = 0.004). T2WSI changed between preoperative MRI and month 6 MRI in one-half of the patients. Finally, SST5 IRS was higher in preoperative hyperintense compared with preoperative hypointense adenomas (P = 0.04), and most sparsely granulated and most hyperintense adenomas expressed high SST5 levels. Conclusion We prospectively confirm that SST2A and adenoma granularity are good predictors of response to octreotide. We propose the IRS for scoring system harmonization. MRI sequences must be optimized to be able to use the T2WSI as a predictor of treatment response.