Alexi Ernstoff

Dr. Alexi Ernstoff

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Toxicology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KDKathie L. Dionisio
Kathie L. Dionisio
AFAlicia M. Frame
Alicia M. Frame
MGMichael-Rock Goldsmith
Michael-Rock Goldsmith
JWJohn Wambaugh
John Wambaugh
ALAlan Liddell
Alan Liddell
RJRichard Judson
Richard Judson
Humans are exposed to thousands of chemicals in the workplace, home, and via air, water, food, and soil. A major challenge in estimating chemical exposures is to understand which chemicals are present in these media and microenvironments. Here we describe the Chemical/Product Categories Database (CPCat), a new, publically available (http://actor.epa.gov/cpcat) database of information on chemicals mapped to "use categories" describing the usage or function of the chemical. CPCat was created by combining multiple and diverse sources of data on consumer- and industrial-process based chemical uses from regulatory agencies, manufacturers, and retailers in various countries. The database uses a controlled vocabulary of 833 terms and a novel nomenclature to capture and streamline descriptors of chemical use for 43,596 chemicals from the various sources. Examples of potential applications of CPCat are provided, including identifying chemicals to which children may be exposed and to support prioritization of chemicals for toxicity screening. CPCat is expected to be a valuable resource for regulators, risk assessors, and exposure scientists to identify potential sources of human exposures and exposure pathways, particularly for use in high-throughput chemical exposure assessment.

23 September 2015 in The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKaterina Stylianou
Katerina Stylianou
MHMartin C. Heller
Martin C. Heller
VFVictor L. Fulgoni
Victor L. Fulgoni
AEAlexi Ernstoff
Alexi Ernstoff
GKGregory A. Keoleian
Gregory A. Keoleian
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet

1 September 2016 in Environment International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PFPeter Fantke
Peter Fantke
AEAlexi Ernstoff
Alexi Ernstoff
LHLei Huang
Lei Huang
SCSusan A. Csiszar
Susan A. Csiszar
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet
Humans can be exposed to chemicals in consumer products through product use and environmental emissions over the product life cycle. Exposure pathways are often complex, where chemicals can transfer directly from products to humans during use or exchange between various indoor and outdoor compartments until sub-fractions reach humans. To consistently evaluate exposure pathways along product life cycles, a flexible mass balance-based assessment framework is presented structuring multimedia chemical transfers in a matrix of direct inter-compartmental transfer fractions. By matrix inversion, we quantify cumulative multimedia transfer fractions and exposure pathway-specific product intake fractions defined as chemical mass taken in by humans per unit mass of chemical in a product. Combining product intake fractions with chemical mass in the product yields intake estimates for use in life cycle impact assessment and chemical alternatives assessment, or daily intake doses for use in risk-based assessment and high-throughput screening. Two illustrative examples of chemicals used in personal care products and flooring materials demonstrate how this matrix-based framework offers a consistent and efficient way to rapidly compare exposure pathways for adult and child users and for the general population. This framework constitutes a user-friendly approach to develop, compare and interpret multiple human exposure scenarios in a coupled system of near-field ('user' environment), far-field and human intake compartments, and helps understand the contribution of individual pathways to overall human exposure in various product application contexts to inform decisions in different science-policy fields for which exposure quantification is relevant.

1 January 2015 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLauren B. Stadler
Lauren B. Stadler
LSLijuan Su
Lijuan Su
CMChristopher J. Moline
Christopher J. Moline
AEAlexi Ernstoff
Alexi Ernstoff
DADiana S. Aga
Diana S. Aga
NLNancy G. Love
Nancy G. Love

23 June 2015 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OJOlivier Jolliet
Olivier Jolliet
AEAlexi Ernstoff
Alexi Ernstoff
SCSusan A. Csiszar
Susan A. Csiszar
PFPeter Fantke
Peter Fantke

1 May 2015 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Hyeong-Moo ShinHyeong-Moo Shin
Hyeong-Moo Shin
AEAlexi Ernstoff
Alexi Ernstoff
JAJon A. Arnot
Jon A. Arnot
BWBarbara A. Wetmore
Barbara A. Wetmore
SCSusan A. Csiszar
Susan A. Csiszar
DBDeborah H. Bennett
Deborah H. Bennett
We present a risk-based high-throughput screening (HTS) method to identify chemicals for potential health concerns or for which additional information is needed. The method is applied to 180 organic chemicals as a case study. We first obtain information on how the chemical is used and identify relevant use scenarios (e.g., dermal application, indoor emissions). For each chemical and use scenario, exposure models are then used to calculate a chemical intake fraction, or a product intake fraction, accounting for chemical properties and the exposed population. We then combine these intake fractions with use scenario-specific estimates of chemical quantity to calculate daily intake rates (iR; mg/kg/day). These intake rates are compared to oral equivalent doses (OED; mg/kg/day), calculated from a suite of ToxCast in vitro bioactivity assays using in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation and reverse dosimetry. Bioactivity quotients (BQs) are calculated as iR/OED to obtain estimates of potential impact associated with each relevant use scenario. Of the 180 chemicals considered, 38 had maximum iRs exceeding minimum OEDs (i.e., BQs > 1). For most of these compounds, exposures are associated with direct intake, food/oral contact, or dermal exposure. The method provides high-throughput estimates of exposure and important input for decision makers to identify chemicals of concern for further evaluation with additional information or more refined models.