Nhu-An Pham

Nhu-An Pham


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 December 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRicarda Hinzpeter
Ricarda Hinzpeter
RKRoshini Kulanthaivelu
Roshini Kulanthaivelu
AKAndres Kohan
Andres Kohan
LALisa Avery
Lisa Avery
NPNhu-An Pham
Nhu-An Pham
PVPatrick Veit-Haibach
Patrick Veit-Haibach
We investigate whether computed tomography (CT) derived radiomics may correlate with driver gene mutations in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this retrospective study, 47 patients (mean age 64 ± 11 years; range: 42–86 years) with PDAC, who were treated surgically and who underwent preoperative CT imaging at our institution were included in the study. Image segmentation and feature extraction was performed semi-automatically with a commonly used open-source software platform. Genomic data from whole genome sequencing (WGS) were collected from our institution’s web-based resource. Two statistical models were then built, in order to evaluate the predictive ability of CT-derived radiomics feature for driver gene mutations in PDAC. 30/47 of all tumor samples harbored 2 or more gene mutations. Overall, 81% of tumor samples demonstrated mutations in KRAS, 68% of samples had alterations in TP53, 26% in SMAD4 and 19% in CDKN2A. Extended statistical analysis revealed acceptable predictive ability for KRAS and TP53 (Youden Index 0.56 and 0.67, respectively) and mild to acceptable predictive signal for SMAD4 and CDKN2A (Youden Index 0.5, respectively). Our study establishes acceptable correlation of radiomics features and driver gene mutations in PDAC, indicating an acceptable prognostication of genomic profiles using CT-derived radiomics. A larger and more homogenous cohort may further enhance the predictive ability.

19 July 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDennis Wang
Dennis Wang
NPNhu-An Pham
Nhu-An Pham
TFTimothy Freeman
Timothy Freeman
VRVibha Raghavan
Vibha Raghavan
RNRoya Navab
Roya Navab
MTMing Tsao
Ming Tsao
The burden of somatic mutations and neoantigens has been associated with improved survival in cancer treated with immunotherapies, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is uncertainty about their effect on outcome in early-stage untreated cases. We posited that the burden of mutations in a specific set of genes may also contribute to the prognosis of early NSCLC patients. From a small cohort of 36 NSCLC cases, we were able to identify somatic mutations and copy number alterations in 865 genes that contributed to patient overall survival. Simply, the number of altered genes (NAG) among these 865 genes was associated with longer disease-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.153, p = 1.48 × 10−4). The gene expression signature distinguishing patients with high/low NAG was also prognostic in three independent datasets. Patients with a high NAG could be further stratified based on the presence of immunogenic mutations, revealing a further subgroup of stage I NSCLC with even better prognosis (85% with >5 years survival), and associated with cytotoxic T-cell expression. Importantly, 95% of the highly-altered genes lacked direct relation to cancer, but were implicated in pathways regulating cell proliferation, motility and immune response.

9 September 2020 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JOJanosch Ortmann
Janosch Ortmann
LRLadislav Rampášek
Ladislav Rampášek
ETElijah Tai
Elijah Tai
AMArvind Singh Mer
Arvind Singh Mer
RSRuoshi Shi
Ruoshi Shi
AGAnna Goldenberg
Anna Goldenberg
Quantifying response to drug treatment in mouse models of human cancer is important for treatment development and assignment, and yet remains a challenging task. A preferred measure to quantify this response should take into account as much of the experimental data as possible, i.e. both tumor size over time and the variation among replicates. We propose a theoretically grounded measure, KuLGaP, to compute the difference between the treatment and control arms. KuLGaP is more selective than currently existing measures, reduces the risk of false positive calls and improves translation of the lab results to clinical practice.