Daniel Chastain

Dr. Daniel Chastain

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2020 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDaniel Chastain
Daniel Chastain
SOSharmon P. Osae
Sharmon P. Osae
Andrés Henao-MartinezAndrés Henao-Martinez
Andrés Henao-Martinez
Carlos Franco-ParedesCarlos Franco-Paredes
Carlos Franco-Paredes
JCJoeanna S. Chastain
Joeanna S. Chastain
HYHenry N. Young
Henry N. Young
There are sufficient data demonstrating that coexisting conditions in patients with Covid-19 influence clinical outcomes and that older age and male sex are associated with a greater risk of death. But despite disproportionately higher rates of Covid-19 infection, hospitalization, and death in racial and ethnic minority groups, the direct effects of genetic or biologic host factors remain unknown.1

22 August 2017 in Current Infectious Disease Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDaniel Chastain
Daniel Chastain
Andrés Henao-MartinezAndrés Henao-Martinez
Andrés Henao-Martinez
Carlos Franco-ParedesCarlos Franco-Paredes
Carlos Franco-Paredes

8 July 2023 in Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LILuis Raúl Rosas-Hostos Infantes
Luis Raúl Rosas-Hostos Infantes
GYGuillermo Andres Paredes Yataco
Guillermo Andres Paredes Yataco
YOYeimer Ortiz-Martínez
Yeimer Ortiz-Martínez
TMTreana Mayer
Treana Mayer
ATAngelica Terashima
Angelica Terashima
Andrés Henao-MartinezAndrés Henao-Martinez
Andrés Henao-Martinez
Background: Fascioliasis is a parasitic zoonosis that can infect humans and be a source of significant morbidity. The World Health Organization lists human fascioliasis as a neglected tropical disease, but the worldwide prevalence of fascioliasis data is unknown. Objective: We aimed to estimate the global prevalence of human fascioliasis. Data sources and methods: We performed a systematic review and prevalence meta-analysis. We used the following inclusion criteria: articles published in the English, Portuguese, or Spanish languages from December 1985 to October 2022 and studies assessing the prevalence of Fasciola in the general population with an appropriate diagnostic methodology, including longitudinal studies, prospective and retrospective cohorts, case series, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We excluded animal studies. Two reviewers independently reviewed the selected studies for methodological quality, performing critical standard measures from JBI SUMARI. A random-effects model was conducted of the summary extracted data on the prevalence proportions. We reported the estimates according to the GATHER statement. Results: In all, 5617 studies were screened for eligibility. Fifty-five studies from 15 countries were selected, including 154,697 patients and 3987 cases. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled prevalence of 4.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1–6.1; I2 = 99.4%; T2 = 0.07]. The prevalence in South America, Africa, and Asia was 9.0%, 4.8%, and 2.0%, respectively. The highest prevalence was found in Bolivia (21%), Peru (11%), and Egypt (6%). Subgroup analysis showed higher prevalence estimates in children, in studies from South America, and when Fas2-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used as a diagnostic method. A larger study sample size ( p = 0.027) and an increase in female percentage ( p = 0.043) correlated with a decrease in prevalence. Multiple meta-regression showed a higher prevalence for hyperendemic than hypoendemic ( p = 0.002) or mesoendemic ( p = 0.013) regions. Conclusion: The estimated prevalence and projected disease burden of human fascioliasis are high. Study findings support that fascioliasis continues to be a globally neglected tropical disease. Strengthening epidemiological surveillance and implementing measures to control and treat fascioliasis is imperative in the most affected areas.

29 November 2022 in AIDS
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DCDaniel Chastain
Daniel Chastain
GMGabriel Motoa
Gabriel Motoa
YOYeimer Ortiz-Martínez
Yeimer Ortiz-Martínez
AGAmal Gharamti
Amal Gharamti
AHAndrés F. Henao-Martínez
Andrés F. Henao-Martínez
Objectives: To compare characteristics and clinical manifestations of monkeypox (MPX) between people with and without HIV in the United States. Design: Retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a federated research network. Methods: Patients 18 years and older with MPX were identified based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis code B04 and divided into two groups: people with HIV (PWH) and people without HIV. Differences in baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, and all-cause healthcare utilization were examined between groups. Outcomes were reported before and after propensity score matching. Results: Of 322 cases of MPX included, 29% (n = 93) were PWH. Baseline characteristics were similar, but PWH were more likely to identify as Black or African American persons (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.0303) or as Hispanic or Latino persons (24% vs. 11%, P = 0.0345) and more likely to report lifestyle factors affecting health status. Rash and rectal pain were more common in PWH (25% vs. 11%, P < 0.01, and 25% vs. 10%, P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, PWH had higher rates of anal or rectal abscesses (11% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001), phimosis (11% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001), and pneumonia (11% vs. 0%, P < 0.0001). More PWH required urgent care visits (53% vs. 29%, P < 0.0001) and hospitalizations (11% vs. 4%, P = 0.0314), but not emergency department visits (42% vs. 58%, P = 0.0085). Conclusion: PWH had higher rates of clinical manifestations and required greater utilization of healthcare resources for any reason compared with those without HIV.

1 September 2020 in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GTGeren Thomas
Geren Thomas
Andrés Henao-MartinezAndrés Henao-Martinez
Andrés Henao-Martinez
Carlos Franco-ParedesCarlos Franco-Paredes
Carlos Franco-Paredes
DCDaniel Chastain
Daniel Chastain

11 February 2025 in Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMary E. George
Mary E. George
TGTonisha T. Gaitor
Tonisha T. Gaitor
ACAshley Cluck
Ashley Cluck
Andrés Henao-MartinezAndrés Henao-Martinez
Andrés Henao-Martinez
NSNicholas R. Sells
Nicholas R. Sells
DCDaniel Chastain
Daniel Chastain
Anthropogenic climate change, primarily driven by greenhouse gas emissions, is reshaping ecosystems and creating conditions that affect 58% of all known human infectious diseases, including fungal infections. Specifically, increasing temperatures, changing precipitation patterns, and extreme weather events are influencing fungal growth, distribution, and virulence. These factors may expand the geographic range of pathogenic fungi, exposing populations to novel, potentially more virulent, or drug-resistant strains. Simultaneously, human factors such as declining immunity, aging populations, and increased use of immunosuppressive therapies are enhancing host susceptibility. This review explores the intricate relationship between climate change and fungal infections, highlighting pathogens that may demonstrate increased virulence and antifungal resistance, along with emerging novel pathogens. The clinical implications are profound, with increased morbidity, mortality, and the spread of fungal infections into new regions. Immediate action is required to develop policies, educational initiatives, and novel antifungal therapies, enhance early diagnostic capabilities, and address healthcare disparities to mitigate the growing burden of fungal infections.