Davide Lovisolo

Prof. Davide Lovisolo


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2011 in Small
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PAPaolo Ariano
Paolo Ariano
PZPollyanna Zamburlin
Pollyanna Zamburlin
AGAlessandra Gilardino
Alessandra Gilardino
RMRenato Mortera
Renato Mortera
BOBarbara Onida
Barbara Onida
DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo

1 September 2015 in The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAlessandra Gilardino
Alessandra Gilardino
FCfederico Catalano
federico Catalano
FRFederico Alessandro Ruffinatti
Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti
GAGabriele Alberto
Gabriele Alberto
BNBernd Nilius
Bernd Nilius
DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo

1 January 2018 in AIMS Molecular Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo
MDMarianna Dionisi
Marianna Dionisi
FRFederico A. Ruffinatti
Federico A. Ruffinatti
CDCarla Distasi
Carla Distasi
The last decades have seen an explosive increase in the development of nanoparticles and in their use in consumer, industrial and medical applications. Their fast diffusion has also raised widespread concern about the potential toxic effects on living organisms, including humans: at the nanoscale, they can interact with subcellular components such as membranes, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, thus inducing unpredicted functional perturbations in cells and tissues. The nervous tissue is a particular sensitive target, because its cellular components (mainly neurons and glial cells) are tightly regulated and metabolically exigent biological entities. While the literature on the potential toxicity of nanoparticles has grown in parallel with their utilization, the available data on neurotoxicity are less abundant. In particular, information on the neuronal molecular targets of nanoparticles is still largely incomplete. A better understanding of this issue is highly relevant for the rational and controlled design of nanoparticles, both for their general utilization and more specifically for their use in the promising field of nanoneuromedicine. In this review, we will discuss the available information on the mechanisms involved in the interaction between nanoobjects and cells of the nervous system, focusing on the known molecular actors, both at the plasma membrane and in intracellular compartments.

DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo
AGAlessandra Gilardino
Alessandra Gilardino
FRFederico Alessandro Ruffinatti
Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti
Nanosized objects are increasingly present in everyday life and in specialized technological applications. In recent years, as a consequence of concern about their potential adverse effects, intense research effort has led to a better understanding of the physicochemical properties that underlie their biocompatibility or potential toxicity, setting the basis for a rational approach to their use in the different fields of application. Among the functional parameters that can be perturbed by interaction between nanoparticles (NPs) and living structures, calcium homeostasis is one of the key players and has been actively investigated. One of the most relevant biological targets is represented by the nervous system (NS), since it has been shown that these objects can access the NS through several pathways; moreover, engineered nanoparticles are increasingly developed to be used for imaging and drug delivery in the NS. In neurons, calcium homeostasis is tightly regulated through a complex set of mechanisms controlling both calcium increases and recovery to the basal levels, and even minor perturbations can have severe consequences on neuronal viability and function, such as excitability and synaptic transmission. In this review, we will focus on the available knowledge about the effects of NPs on the mechanisms controlling calcium signalling and homeostasis in neurons. We have taken into account the data related to environmental NPs, and, in more detail, studies employing engineered NPs, since their more strictly controlled chemical and physical properties allow a better understanding of the relevant parameters that determine the biological responses they elicit. The literature on this specific subject is all quite recent, and we have based the review on the data present in papers dealing strictly with nanoparticles and calcium signals in neuronal cells; while they presently amount to about 20 papers, and no related review is available, the field is rapidly growing and some relevant information is already available. A few general findings can be summarized: most NPs interfere with neuronal calcium homeostasis by interactions at the plasmamembrane, and not following their internalization; influx from the extracellular medium is the main mechanism involved; the effects are dependent in a complex way from concentration, size and surface properties.

26 March 2013 in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PZP. Zamburlin
P. Zamburlin
FRFederico Alessandro Ruffinatti
Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti
AGA. Gilardino
A. Gilardino
SFS. Farcito
S. Farcito
MPM. Parrini
M. Parrini
DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFederico Alessandro Ruffinatti
Federico Alessandro Ruffinatti
AGAlessandra Gilardino
Alessandra Gilardino
VSValter Secchi
Valter Secchi
ECErika Cottone
Erika Cottone
DLDavide Lovisolo
Davide Lovisolo
PBPatrizia Bovolin
Patrizia Bovolin
Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most widely used chemicals worldwide, e.g., as a component of plastic containers for food and water. It is considered to exert an estrogenic effect, by mimicking estradiol (E2) action. Because of this widespread presence, it has attracted the interest and concern of researchers and regulators. Despite the vast amount of related literature, the potential adverse effects of environmentally significant doses of BPA are still object of controversy, and the mechanisms by which it can perturb endocrine functions, and particularly the neuroendocrine axis, are not adequately understood. One of the ways by which endocrine disruptors (EDCs) can exert their effects is the perturbation of calcium signaling mechanisms. In this study, we addressed the issue of the impact of BPA on the neuroendocrine system with an in vitro approach, using a consolidated model of immortalized Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) expressing neurons, the GT1–7 cell line, focusing on the calcium signals activated by the endocrine disruptor. The investigation was limited to biologically relevant doses (nM–µM range). We found that BPA induced moderate increases in intracellular calcium concentration, comparable with those induced by nanomolar doses of E2, without affecting cell survival and with only a minor effect on proliferation.