Wouter Jan Klerk

Mr. Wouter Jan Klerk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
HWH C Winsemius
H C Winsemius
WVW J van Verseveld
W J van Verseveld
ABA M R Bakker
A M R Bakker
FDF L M Diermanse
F L M Diermanse

16 February 2018 in Structure and Infrastructure Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
BJBas Jonkman
Bas Jonkman
HVHessel G. Voortman
Hessel G. Voortman
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
SVSaskia van Vuren
Saskia van Vuren
This article highlights recent developments in flood risk management in the Netherlands and presents approaches for reliability analysis and asset management for flood defences and hydraulic infrastructure. The functioning of this infrastructure is of great importance for the country as large parts of it are prone to flooding. Based on a nationwide flood risk assessment, new safety standards for flood defences have been derived in the form of maximal acceptable failure probabilities. A framework for the reliability-based analysis of the performance of hydraulic infrastructure is introduced. Within this context, various challenges are discussed, such as the dynamic nature of loads, resistance and reliability requirements over time. Various case studies are presented to highlight advances and challenges in various application fields. The first case illustrates how structural health monitoring contributes to a better characterisation of the reliability of the defences and how innovative measures can enhance the reliability. The second case discusses how the river system can be managed in the context of the new safety standards. The third case shows how upgrades and reinforcements of hydraulic structures can be evaluated taking into account (uncertain) future developments, such as sea level rise.

1 March 2021 in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
WKWim Kanning
Wim Kanning
MKMatthijs Kok
Matthijs Kok
RWRogier Wolfert
Rogier Wolfert

30 August 2019 in Infrastructures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
TSTimo Schweckendiek
Timo Schweckendiek
FHFrank den Heijer
Frank den Heijer
MKMatthijs Kok
Matthijs Kok
One of the most rapidly emerging measures in infrastructure asset management is Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), which aims at reducing uncertainty in structural performance by using monitoring equipment. As earthen flood defence structures typically have large strength uncertainties, such techniques can be particularly promising. However, insight in the key characteristics for successful SHM for flood defences is lacking, which hampers the practical implementation. In this study, we explore the benefits of pore pressure monitoring, one of the most promising SHM techniques for earthen flood defences. The approach is based on a Bayesian pre-posterior analysis, and results are evaluated based on the Value of Information (VoI) obtained from different monitoring strategies. We specifically investigate the effect on long-term reinforcement decisions. The results show that, next to the relative magnitude of reducible uncertainty, the combination of the probability of having a useful observation and the duration of a SHM effort determine the VoI. As it is likely that increasing loads due to climate change will result in more frequent future reinforcements, the influence of scenarios of different rates of increase in future loads is also investigated. It was found that, in all considered possible scenarios, monitoring yields a positive Value of Information, hence it is an economically efficient measure for flood defence asset management both now and in the future.

1 November 2019 in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDE.J.C. Dupuits
E.J.C. Dupuits
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
TST. Schweckendiek
T. Schweckendiek
KBK.M. de Bruijn
K.M. de Bruijn

3 December 2020 in Infrastructures
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BVBart Vonk
Bart Vonk
WKWouter Jan Klerk
Wouter Jan Klerk
PFPeter Fröhle
Peter Fröhle
Berry GersoniusBerry Gersonius
Berry Gersonius
FHFrank den Heijer
Frank den Heijer
Richard M. AshleyRichard M. Ashley
Richard M. Ashley
Uncertainties about climate change consequences, changing societal requirements and system complexity require flood protection asset managers to continuously evaluate their asset management policies and practice to manage risk and improve the resilience of their assets. However, there are many challenges in doing this, with asset operators often facing conflicting interests and major uncertainties about the future needs for asset performance. In the EU Interreg IV FAIR project, flood protection asset owners and operators, with scientific partners from the North Sea Region of Europe collaborated to develop practical guidance for adaptive asset management of flood protection infrastructure. The central component of this guidance is the FAIR framework, presented here. The framework combines insights and principles from ISO 55000 on asset management and ISO 14090 on climate adaptation with asset operator experiences to provide a practical guide for integration of asset management considerations within both strategic and operational contexts via a tactical handshake. This is a means to avoid the common lack of connection between strategic plans and operational practice. The applicability of the framework is illustrated with examples from Pilot Cases within the FAIR project, in which its value in terms of improved asset management and reduced costs has been demonstrated.