Kuo-Chin Chang

Kuo-Chin Chang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 September 2021 in Liver Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMing-Chao Tsai
Ming-Chao Tsai
CWChih-Chi Wang
Chih-Chi Wang
WLweichen Lee
weichen Lee
CLChih-Che Lin
Chih-Che Lin
KCKuo-Chin Chang
Kuo-Chin Chang
THTsung-Hui Hu
Tsung-Hui Hu
Background: It is unclear whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) have different effects on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and death in patients receiving curative hepatectomy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term efficacy of ETV and TDF in HCC recurrence and overall survival (OS) of patients after curative hepatectomy. Methods: From January 2010 to December 2019, 20,572 patients with HCC who received hepatectomy were screened for study eligibility. Finally, a total of 219 consecutive patients treated with ETV (n = 146) or TDF (n = 73) after curative hepatectomy for HBV-related HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 or A were analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM) (2:1) analysis and competing risk analysis. HCC recurrence and OS of patients were compared between ETV and TDF groups. Result: After a median follow-up of 52.2 months, 81 patients (37.0%) had HCC recurrence, 33 (15.1%) died, and 5 (2.3%) received liver transplantation. TDF therapy was an independent protective factor for HCC recurrence compared with ETV therapy (HR, 1.687; 95% CI, 1.027–2.770, p = 0.039); however, no difference in the risk of death or liver transplantation. Results were similar in competing risk analysis. We further found that TDF therapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of late recurrence (HR, 4.705; 95% CI, 1.763–12.558, p = 0.002), but not in early recurrence. Conclusions: TDF therapy is associated with a significantly lower risk of HCC recurrence, especially of late recurrence, than ETV therapy among patients who undergo curative hepatectomy for HBV-related early-stage HCC.

1 December 2018 in Transplantation Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YYYi-Hao Yen
Yi-Hao Yen
FKF.Y. Kuo
F.Y. Kuo
CLC.C. Lin
C.C. Lin
CCC.L. Chen
C.L. Chen
KCKuo-Chin Chang
Kuo-Chin Chang
THTsung-Hui Hu
Tsung-Hui Hu
Hepatic steatosis (HS) can cause substantial problems for both donors and recipients in living donor liver transplantation. The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a noninvasive method of measuring HS using a process based on transient elastography. To evaluate the accuracy of CAP in quantifying HS during living donor liver transplantation. A total of 54 liver donors who received CAP and intraoperative liver biopsy (LB) were enrolled in this study. The performance of CAP compared with LB for diagnosing HS was assessed using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves. HS was defined by the presence of steatosis in >5% of hepatocytes. No HS was found in 47 donors, while the remaining 7 donors showed HS ranging from 10% to 30%. Using CAP, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1; P < .001) for HS; the optimal cutoff value for HS was 257 dB/m (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 89.4%, positive predictive value: 58.3%, negative predictive value: 100%). Among the 42 candidates with CAP <257 dB/m, none had HS, while of the 12 candidates with CAP ≥257 dB/m, 7 had HS. In a multivariate linear regression analyses, body mass index (β = 0.71, P < .001) was found to be independently associated with CAP in those without HS. CAP might be a promising tool to exclude HS in East Asian living liver donors. Body mass index was found to be independently associated with CAP values in those without HS.

22 November 2017 in Liver International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YYYi-Hao Yen
Yi-Hao Yen
MLMing‐Tsung Lin
Ming‐Tsung Lin
FKFang‐Ying Kuo
Fang‐Ying Kuo
KCKuo-Chin Chang
Kuo-Chin Chang
MTMing-Chao Tsai
Ming-Chao Tsai
CCChien-Hung Chen
Chien-Hung Chen


13 November 2013 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMing-Chao Tsai
Ming-Chao Tsai
HYHsien-Chung Yu
Hsien-Chung Yu
CHChao-Hung Hung
Chao-Hung Hung
CLChuan‐Mo Lee
Chuan‐Mo Lee
KCKing-Wah Chiu
King-Wah Chiu
THTsung-Hui Hu
Tsung-Hui Hu

24 January 2015 in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMing‐Tsung Lin
Ming‐Tsung Lin
KCKuo-Chin Chang
Kuo-Chin Chang
YCYeh‐Pin Chou
Yeh‐Pin Chou
PTPo‐Lin Tseng
Po‐Lin Tseng
YYYi-Hao Yen
Yi-Hao Yen
THTsung‐Hui Hu
Tsung‐Hui Hu