Peter King

Dr. Peter King

Centre for Renewable Energy Systems, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedford MK43 0AL, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2017 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPSimoni Perini
Simoni Perini
XTXavier Tonnellier
Xavier Tonnellier
PKPeter King
Peter King
CSChristopher Sansom
Christopher Sansom
Linear concentrating solar thermal systems offer a promising method for harvesting solar energy. In this paper, a model for a novel linear Fresnel lens collector with dual-axis tracking capability is presented. The main objective is to determine the performance curve of this technology by means of both experiment and theoretical analysis. A mathematical model including the optical model of the concentrator and the heat transfer model of the receiver pipe was developed. This tool was validated with experimental data collected using a proof of concept prototype installed in Bourne, UK. The performance curve of the collector was derived for temperatures between 40 °C and 90 °C. The results show that the global efficiency of the collector is limited to less than 20%. The energy losses have been analysed. The optical losses in the lens system accounts for 47% of the total energy dissipated. These are due to absorption, reflection and diffraction in the Fresnel lenses. Furthermore manufacturing error in the lens fabrication has to be considered. One third of the solar radiation collected is lost due to the low solar absorptance of the receiver pipe. Thermal radiation and convection accounts for 6% of the total as relatively low temperatures (up to 90 °C) are involved. In order to increase the performance of the system, it is recommended to install an evacuated receiver and to insulate the recirculation system. Considering data from manufacturers, these improvements could increase the global efficiency up to 55%. Utilising the results from this work, there is the intention of building an improved version of this prototype and to conduct further tests

1 May 2015 in Energy Procedia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSChristopher Sansom
Christopher Sansom
PCP. Comley
P. Comley
PKPeter King
Peter King
HAH. Almond
H. Almond
CAC. Atkinson
C. Atkinson
EEE. Endaya
E. Endaya
This paper presents a methodology to predict the optical performance and physical topography of the glass collector surfaces of any given CSP plant in the presence of sand and dust storms, providing that local climate conditions are known and representative sand and dust particles samples are available. Using existing meteorological data for a defined CSP plant in Egypt, plus sand and dust samples from two desert locations in Libya, we describe how to derive air speed, duration, and sand concentrations to use within the Global CSP Laboratory sand erosion simulation rig at Cranfield University. This then allows us to predict the optical performance of parabolic trough collector glass after an extended period by the use of accelerated ageing. However the behavior of particles in sandstorms is complex and has prompted a theoretical analysis of sand particle dynamics which is also described in this paper

19 March 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZHZaharaddeen Ali Hussaini
Zaharaddeen Ali Hussaini
PKPeter King
Peter King
CSChristopher Sansom
Christopher Sansom
In power tower systems, the heliostat field is one of the essential subsystems in the plant due to its significant contribution to the plant’s overall power losses and total plant investment cost. The design and optimization of the heliostat field is hence an active area of research, with new field improvement processes and configurations being actively investigated. In this paper, a different configuration of a multi-tower field is explored. This involves adding an auxiliary tower to the field of a conventional power tower Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) system. The choice of the position of the auxiliary tower was based on the region in the field which has the least effective reflecting heliostats. The multi-tower configuration was initially applied to a 50 MWth conventional field in the case study region of Nigeria. The results from an optimized field show a marked increase in the annual thermal energy output and mean annual efficiency of the field. The biggest improvement in the optical efficiency loss factors be seen from the cosine, which records an improvement of 6.63%. Due to the size of the field, a minimal increment of 3020 MWht in the Levelized Cost of Heat (LCOH) was, however, recorded. In much larger fields, though, a higher number of weaker heliostats were witnessed in the field. The auxiliary tower in the field provides an alternate aim point for the weaker heliostat, thereby considerably cutting down on some optical losses, which in turn gives rise to higher energy output. At 400 MWth, the multi-tower field configuration provides a lower LCOH than the single conventional power tower field.

1 October 2017 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSChristopher Sansom
Christopher Sansom
AFAránzazu Fernández-García
Aránzazu Fernández-García
PKPeter King
Peter King
FSFlorian Sutter
Florian Sutter
AGAlejandro García-Segura
Alejandro García-Segura
This paper compares the two most common reflectometers used to assess the specular reflectance of back-silvered glass mirrors for Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) applications, namely the Device and Services (D&S) 15R-USB and the Abengoa Condor SR-6.1 instruments. Comparisons are first made between the two instruments themselves using a Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility (R&R) study. Results are given for the as-cleaned collector mirrors and then as the mirrors become naturally soiled over a one month period. The results of the Gage R&R study show that for the D&S the gage itself contributes 40.97% of the variability, whilst 59.03% is due to part-to-part (location on the mirror under investigation) variability. For the Condor we show that the % Contribution from the gage is 62.18% of the total variability with only 37.82% of the contribution attributable to the location dependent reflectance. The Condor has a wider acceptance angle, and over the reflectance range of 0.91–0.95 the condor was found to measure higher than the D&S by an average of 1.53%. The differences between the soiling results obtained from the two instruments are explained, and the results are used to derive a predictive model for the soiling of solar collectors. In conclusion, both instruments have advantages and shortcomings, and the factors that influence which instrument to select are discussed

1 February 2020 in Energy Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HAH.T. Abdulkarim
H.T. Abdulkarim
CSC.L. Sansom
C.L. Sansom
Kumar PatchigollaKumar Patchigolla
Kumar Patchigolla
PKPeter King
Peter King

1 April 2021 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPierre-Antoine Parent
Pierre-Antoine Parent
PMPegah Mirzania
Pegah Mirzania
NONazmiye Ozkan
Nazmiye Ozkan
PKPeter King
Peter King