This paper introduces a simple notion of layering as a tool for analyzing well-behaved runs of a given model of distributed computation. Using layering, a model-independent analysis of the consensus problem is performed and then applied to proving lower bounds and impossibility results for consensus in a number of familiar and less familiar models. The proofs are simpler and more direct than existing ones, and they expose a unified structure to the difficulty of reaching consensus. In particular, the proofs for the classical synchronous and asynchronous models now follow the same outline. A new notion of connectivity among states in runs of a consensus protocol, called potence connectivity, is introduced. This notion is more general than previous notions of connectivity used for this purpose and plays a keyrole in the uniform analysis of consensus.

This article introduces and explores the condition-based approach to solve the consensus problem in asynchronous systems. The approach studies conditions that identify sets of input vectors for which it is possible to solve consensus despite the occurrence of up to f process crashes. The first main result defines acceptable conditions and shows that these are exactly the conditions for which a consensus protocol exists. Two examples of realistic acceptable conditions are presented, and proved to be maximal, in the sense that they cannot be extended and remain acceptable. The second main result is a generic consensus shared-memory protocol for any acceptable condition. The protocol always guarantees agreement and validity, and terminates (at least) when the inputs satisfy the condition with which the protocol has been instantiated, or when there are no crashes. An efficient version of the protocol is then designed for the message passing model that works when f < n /2, and it is shown that no such protocol exists when f ≥ n /2. It is also shown how the protocol's safety can be traded for its liveness.

This paper presents a self-contained study of wait-free solvable tasks. A new necessary condition for wait-free solvability, based on a restricted set of executions, is proved. This set of executions induces a very simple-to-understand structure, which is used to prove tight bounds for k-set consensus and renaming. The framework is based on topology, but uses only elementary combinatorics, and, in contrast to previous works, does not rely on algebraic or geometric arguments.