Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can identify novel cancer targets. However, interpreting the molecular findings and accessing drugs/clinical trials is challenging. Furthermore, many tumors show resistance to monotherapies. To implement a precision strategy, we initiated a multidisciplinary (basic/translational/clinical investigators, bioinformaticians, geneticists, and physicians from multiple specialties) molecular tumor board (MTB), which included a project manager to facilitate obtaining clinical-grade biomarkers (blood/tissue NGS, specific immunohistochemistry/RNA expression including for immune-biomarkers, per physician discretion) and medication-acquisition specialists/clinical trial coordinators/navigators to assist with medication access. The MTB comprehensively reviewed patient characteristics to develop N-of-One treatments implemented by the treating physician’s direction under the auspices of a master protocol. Overall, 265/429 therapy-evaluable patients (62%) were matched to ≥1 recommended drug. Eighty-six patients (20%) matched to all drugs recommended by MTB, including combinatorial approaches, while 38% received physician’s choice regimen, generally with unmatched approach/low degree of matching. Our results show that patients who receive MTB-recommended regimens (versus physician choice) have significantly longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and are better matched to therapy. High (≥50%) versus low (<50%) Matching Score therapy (roughly reflecting therapy matched to ≥50% versus <50% of alterations) independently correlates with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50–0.80;P < 0.001) and OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50–0.90;P = 0.007) and higher stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete remission rate (52.1% versus 30.4%P < 0.001) (all multivariate). In conclusion, patients who receive MTB-based therapy are better matched to their genomic alterations, and the degree of matching is an independent predictor of improved oncologic outcomes including survival.

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, via nucleosome topology modulation, regulates transcription. The SMARCA4 (BRG1) subunit codes for the ATPase energy engine of the SWI/SNF complex. SMARCA4 is a tumor suppressor that is aberrant in ∼5% to 7% of human malignancies. Class I SMARCA4 alterations (truncating mutations, fusions, and homozygous deletion) lead to loss of function whereas class II alterations (missense mutations) have a dominant negative/gain-of-function effect and/or loss-of function. SMARCA4 alterations typify the ultra-rare small cell carcinomas of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and SMARCA4-deficient thoracic and uterine sarcomas; they are also found in a subset of more common tumors, for example, lung, colon, bladder, and breast carcinomas. Germline variants in the SMARCA4 gene lead to various hereditary conditions: rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome-2 (RTPS2), characterized by loss-of-function alterations and aggressive rhabdoid tumors presenting in infants and young children; and Coffin-Siris syndrome, characterized by dominant negative/gain-of function alterations and developmental delays, microcephaly, unique facies, and hypoplastic nails of the fifth fingers or toes. A minority of rhabdoid tumors have a germline SMARCA4 variant as do >40% of women with SCCOHT. Importantly, immune checkpoint blockade has shown remarkable, albeit anecdotal, responses in SCCOHT. In addition, there is ongoing research into BET, EZH2, HDAC, CDK4/6, and FGFR inhibitors, as well as agents that might induce synthetic lethality via DNA damage repair impairment (ATR inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy), or via the exploitation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation inhibitors or AURKA inhibitors, in SMARCA4-aberrant cancers.

The steady advances in oncology bring a host of therapeutic options for older adults (≤65 years old) with cancer. As these patients experience this proliferation of anticancer therapies, their caregivers too have witnessed their role rapidly expanding and evolving as they care for these individuals. To better understand the caregiver experience, a review of the current literature on informal caregiving and cancer caregiving was conducted. These informal caregivers are often individuals with a strong personal connection to the person with advanced cancer, such as a close relative, spouse/partner or friend. Caregivers provide a broad range of assistance with most aspects of day-to-day life. However, we have limited knowledge of the impact of this role on the caregivers themselves, particularly in the context of an older adult patient and their unique needs. Here, we explore the data on caregiver experience when caring for a person with advanced cancers—specifically, we characterise the symptom burden and effects on the caregiver well-being with emphasis on the care of older adults with cancer.

With the addition of molecular testing to the oncologist’s diagnostic toolbox, patients have benefitted from the successes of gene- and immune-directed therapies. These therapies are often most effective when administered to the subset of malignancies harboring the target identified by molecular testing. An important advance in the application of molecular testing is the liquid biopsy, wherein circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is analyzed for point mutations, copy number alterations, and amplifications by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The advantages of evaluating ctDNA over tissue DNA include (i) ctDNA requires only a tube of blood, rather than an invasive biopsy, (ii) ctDNA can plausibly reflect DNA shedding from multiple metastatic sites while tissue DNA reflects only the piece of tissue biopsied, and (iii) dynamic changes in ctDNA during therapy can be easily followed with repeat blood draws. Tissue biopsies allow comprehensive assessment of DNA, RNA, and protein expression in the tumor and its microenvironment as well as functional assays; however, tumor tissue acquisition is costly with a risk of complications. Herein, we review the ways in which ctDNA assessment can be leveraged to understand the dynamic changes of molecular landscape in cancers.

Precision medicine has exploited next-generation sequencing (NGS) and gene/immune-targeted drug deployment to transform the outlook for several lethal cancers. For instance, there are now several FDA-approved medications that target the sequelae of aberrant genes in a tissue-agnostic approach: pembrolizumab [microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb)] and larotrectinib/entrectinib (NTRK fusions). Molecular interrogation further reveals the disruptive reality that metastatic cancers are tremendously complex and individually distinct. Therefore, optimized treatment often requires drug combinations (rather than monotherapy) and N-of-one customization. Early studies of this approach suggest feasibility, safety, and efficacy. Real-world data/master registry trials may also provide massive, clinically relevant datasets that further fuel the (r)evolution in oncology.