Max Bannach

Dr. Max Bannach

Institut für Theoretische Informatik, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 August 2019 in Algorithms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMax Bannach
Max Bannach
SBSebastian Berndt
Sebastian Berndt
Parameterized complexity theory has led to a wide range of algorithmic breakthroughs within the last few decades, but the practicability of these methods for real-world problems is still not well understood. We investigate the practicability of one of the fundamental approaches of this field: dynamic programming on tree decompositions. Indisputably, this is a key technique in parameterized algorithms and modern algorithm design. Despite the enormous impact of this approach in theory, it still has very little influence on practical implementations. The reasons for this phenomenon are manifold. One of them is the simple fact that such an implementation requires a long chain of non-trivial tasks (as computing the decomposition, preparing it, …). We provide an easy way to implement such dynamic programs that only requires the definition of the update rules. With this interface, dynamic programs for various problems, such as 3-coloring, can be implemented easily in about 100 lines of structured Java code. The theoretical foundation of the success of dynamic programming on tree decompositions is well understood due to Courcelle’s celebrated theorem, which states that every MSO-definable problem can be efficiently solved if a tree decomposition of small width is given. We seek to provide practical access to this theorem as well, by presenting a lightweight model checker for a small fragment of MSO 1 (that is, we do not consider “edge-set-based” problems). This fragment is powerful enough to describe many natural problems, and our model checker turns out to be very competitive against similar state-of-the-art tools.

28 November 2019 in Theory of Computing Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMax Bannach
Max Bannach
TTTill Tantau
Till Tantau

22 June 2022 in Algorithmica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMax Bannach
Max Bannach
ZHZacharias Heinrich
Zacharias Heinrich
RRRüdiger Reischuk
Rüdiger Reischuk
TTTill Tantau
Till Tantau
Computing small kernels for the hitting set problem is a well-studied computational problem where we are given a hypergraph with n vertices and m hyperedges, each of size d for some small constant d, and a parameter k. The task is to compute a new hypergraph, called a kernel, whose size is polynomial with respect to the parameter k and which has a size-k hitting set if, and only if, the original hypergraph has one. State-of-the-art algorithms compute kernels of size $$k^d$$ k d (which is a polynomial as d is a constant), and they do so in time $$m\cdot 2^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ m · 2 d poly ( d ) for a small polynomial $${\text {poly}}(d)$$ poly ( d ) (which is linear in the hypergraph size for d fixed). We generalize this task to the dynamic setting where hyperedges may continuously be added or deleted and one constantly has to keep track of a size- $$k^d$$ k d kernel. This paper presents a deterministic solution with worst-case time $$3^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 3 d poly ( d ) for updating the kernel upon inserts and time $$5^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 5 d poly ( d ) for updates upon deletions. These bounds nearly match the time $$2^d {\text {poly}}(d)$$ 2 d poly ( d ) needed by the best static algorithm per hyperedge. Let us stress that for constant d our algorithm maintains a hitting set kernel with constant, deterministic, worst-case update time that is independent of n, m, and the parameter k. As a consequence, we also get a deterministic dynamic algorithm for keeping track of size-k hitting sets in d-hypergraphs with update times O(1) and query times $$O(c^k)$$ O ( c k ) where $$c = d - 1 + O(1/d)$$ c = d - 1 + O ( 1 / d ) equals the best base known for the static setting.

26 May 2024
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
MBMax Bannach
Max Bannach
MHMarkus Hecher
Markus Hecher

27 January 2022 in Algorithms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMax Bannach
Max Bannach
SBSebastian Berndt
Sebastian Berndt
Research on the similarity of a graph to being a tree—called the treewidth of the graph—has seen an enormous rise within the last decade, but a practically fast algorithm for this task has been discovered only recently by Tamaki (ESA 2017). It is based on dynamic programming and makes use of the fact that the number of positive subinstances is typically substantially smaller than the number of all subinstances. Algorithms producing only such subinstances are called positive-instance driven (PID). The parameter treedepth has a similar story. It was popularized through the graph sparsity project and is theoretically well understood—but the first practical algorithm was discovered only recently by Trimble (IPEC 2020) and is based on the same paradigm. We give an alternative and unifying view on such algorithms from the perspective of the corresponding configuration graphs in certain two-player games. This results in a single algorithm that can compute a wide range of important graph parameters such as treewidth, pathwidth, and treedepth. We complement this algorithm with a novel randomized data structure that accelerates the enumeration of subproblems in positive-instance driven algorithms.