Maria Kathia Cardenas

Mrs. Maria Kathia Cardenas


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 February 2020 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ABAntonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
VRVíctor G. Sal Y Rosas
Víctor G. Sal Y Rosas
VLVilarmina Ponce Lucero
Vilarmina Ponce Lucero
MCMaria Kathia Cardenas
Maria Kathia Cardenas
RCRodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco
Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco
JMJ. Jaime Jaime Miranda
J. Jaime Jaime Miranda

16 November 2018 in BMJ Global Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DBDavid Beran
David Beran
MLMaria Lazo-Porras
Maria Lazo-Porras
MCMaria Kathia Cardenas
Maria Kathia Cardenas
FCFrançois Chappuis
François Chappuis
ADAlbertino Damasceno
Albertino Damasceno
JMJ. Jaime Jaime Miranda
J. Jaime Jaime Miranda
Different methodological approaches for implementation research in global health focusing on how interventions are developed, implemented and evaluated are needed. In this paper, we detail the approach developed and implemented in the COmmunity HEalth System InnovatiON (COHESION) Project, a global health project aimed at strengthening health systems in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. This project developed innovative formative research at policy, health system and community levels to gain a comprehensive understanding of the barriers, enablers, needs and lessons for the management of chronic disease using non-communicable and neglected tropical diseases as tracer conditions. After formative research, COHESION adopted a co-creation approach in the planning of interventions. The approach included two interactions with each type of stakeholder at policy, health system and community level in each country which aimed to develop interventions to improve the delivery of care of the tracer conditions. Diverse tools and methods were used in order to prioritise interventions based on support, resources and impact. Additionally, a COHESION score that assessed feasibility, sustainability and scaling up was used to select three potential interventions. Next steps for the COHESION Project are to further detail and develop the interventions propositioned through this process. Besides providing some useful tools and methods, this work also highlights the challenges and lessons learned from such an approach.

19 October 2018 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GIGECo Study Investigators
GECo Study Investigators
TSTrishul Siddharthan
Trishul Siddharthan
SPSuzanne L Pollard
Suzanne L Pollard
SQShumonta A Quaderi
Shumonta A Quaderi
AMAndrew J Mirelman
Andrew J Mirelman
JHJohn Hurst
John Hurst
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the end result of a susceptible individual being exposed to sufficiently deleterious environmental stimuli. More than 90% of COPD-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). LMICs face unique challenges in managing COPD; for example, deficient primary care systems present challenges for proper diagnosis and management. Formal diagnosis of COPD requires quality-assured spirometry, which is often limited to urban health centres. Similarly, standard treatment options for COPD remain limited where few providers are trained to manage COPD. The Global Excellence in COPD Outcomes (GECo) studies aim to assess the performance of a COPD case-finding questionnaire with and without peak expiratory flow (PEF) to diagnose COPD, and inform the effectiveness and implementation of COPD self-management Action Plans in LMIC settings. The ultimate goal is to develop simple, low-cost models of care that can be implemented in LMICs. This study will be carried out in Nepal, Peru and Uganda, three distinct LMIC settings. We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a simple questionnaire with and without PEF to case-find COPD (GECo1), and examine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of a community-health-worker-supported self-management Action Plan strategy for managing exacerbations of COPD (GECo2). To achieve the first aim, we will enrol a randomly selected sample of up to 10,500 adults aged ≥ 40 years across our three sites, with the goal to enrol 240 participants with moderate-to-severe COPD in to GECo2. We will apply two case-finding questionnaires (Lung Function Questionnaire and CAPTURE) with and without PEF and compare performance against spirometry. We will report ROC areas, sensitivity and specificity. Individuals who are identified as having COPD grades B–D will be invited to enrol in an effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomised trial of a multi-faceted COPD self-management Action Plan intervention delivered by CHWs. The intervention group will receive (1) COPD education, (2) facilitated-self management Action Plans for COPD exacerbations and (3) monthly visits by community health workers. The control group will receive COPD education and standard of care treatment provided by local health providers. Beginning at baseline, we will measure quality of life with the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) every 3 months over a period of 1 year. The primary endpoint is SGRQ at 12 months. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the Short-Form 36 version 2 will also be calculated. We will additionally assess the acceptability and feasibility of implementing COPD Action Plans in each setting among providers and individuals with COPD. This study should provide evidence to inform the use of pragmatic models of COPD diagnosis and management in LMIC settings. NCT03359915 (GECo1). Registered on 2 December 2017 and NCT03365713 (GECo2). Registered on 7 December 2017. Trial acronym: Global Excellence in COPD Outcomes (GECo1; GECo2).

19 May 2016 in Diabetic Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MCMaria Kathia Cardenas
Maria Kathia Cardenas
JMJ. Jaime Jaime Miranda
J. Jaime Jaime Miranda
DBDavid Beran
David Beran

30 July 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLorena Saavedra-Garcia
Lorena Saavedra-Garcia
ABAntonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
RGRobert H. Gilman
Robert H. Gilman
FDFrancisco Diez-Canseco
Francisco Diez-Canseco
MCMaria Kathia Cardenas
Maria Kathia Cardenas
JMJ. Jaime Jaime Miranda
J. Jaime Jaime Miranda
In resourced-constrained settings, daily cooking practices are still the norm. Replacing sodium in regular salt to produce potassium-enriched salts are potential alternative routes to reduce sodium intake, paired with the benefit associated with potassium intake. This change would likely have effects on palatability and taste of prepared foods, yet a threshold to discriminate sensorial changes can be determined. The main goal of this study was to assess if the use of potassium-enriched salt substitutes lead to perceived differences in taste utilizing a sensory discrimination test. A triangle taste test was conducted and participants were offered samples of cooked rice prepared with different salts. The only ingredient that differed in the preparation was the salt used: 100%NaCl (regular salt) and salts where sodium was replaced by 50%, 33% or 25% KCl (potassium-enriched salt). Comparisons were carried out according to the minimum number of correct judgments. A total of 156 subjects, 49% males, mean age 41.0 years (SD±15.5) years, participated in the study. Samples using 25% potassium-enrichment were indistinguishable in terms of taste from regular salt, whereas samples with 33% and 50% potassium-enrichment were distinguishable. Results were consistent when stratified by sex and age. Less than 10% of participants attributed the differences to bitterness or metallic flavor. The 25% potassium-enriched salt is indistinguishable from regular salt. These findings suggest a potential to achieve sodium intake reduction strategies in cooking practices by substituting regular salt with potassium-enriched salt without affecting palatability.

25 March 2014 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAntonio Bernabe-Ortiz
Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz
FDFrancisco Diez-Canseco
Francisco Diez-Canseco
RGRobert H Gilman
Robert H Gilman
MCMaria Kathia Cardenas
Maria Kathia Cardenas
KSKatherine A Sacksteder
Katherine A Sacksteder
JMJ. Jaime Jaime Miranda
J. Jaime Jaime Miranda
Controlling hypertension rates and maintaining normal blood pressure, particularly in resource-constrained settings, represent ongoing challenges of effective and affordable implementation in health care. One of the strategies being largely advocated to improve high blood pressure calls for salt reduction strategies. This study aims to estimate the impact of a population-level intervention based on sodium reduction and potassium increase – in practice, introducing a low-sodium, high-potassium salt substitute – on adult blood pressure levels.