Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are indicated in type 2 diabetes and obesity for their high efficacy in controlling glycaemia and inducing body weight loss, respectively. Patients may develop gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs), namely nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or constipation. To minimize their severity and duration, healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients must be aware of appropriate measures to follow while undergoing treatment. An expert panel comprising endocrinologists, nephrologists, primary care physicians, cardiologists, internists and diabetes nurse educators convened across virtual meetings to reach a consensus regarding these compelling recommendations. Firstly, specific guidelines are provided about how to reach the maintenance dose and how to proceed if GI AEs develop during dose-escalation. Secondly, specific directions are set about how to avoid/minimize nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation symptoms. Clinical scenarios representing common situations in daily practice, and infographics useful to guide both HCPs and patients, are included. These recommendations may prevent people with T2D and/or obesity from withdrawing from GLP-1 RAs treatment, thus benefitting from their superior effect on glycaemic control and weight loss.

Background: Herpes zoster (HZ) is caused by reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and mainly affects individuals aged ≥50 years. The forthcoming European launch of a vaccine against HZ (Zostavax®) prompts the need for a better understanding of the epidemiology of HZ in Europe. Therefore the aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available data on HZ incidence in Europe and to describe age-specific incidence. Methods: The Medline database of the National Library of Medicine was used to conduct a comprehensive literature search of population-based studies of HZ incidence published between 1960 and 2010 carried out in the 27 member countries of the European Union, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. The identified articles were reviewed and scored according to a reading grid including various quality criteria, and HZ incidence data were extracted and presented by country. Results: The search identified 21 studies, and revealed a similar annual HZ incidence throughout Europe, varying by country from 2.0 to 4.6/1 000 person-years with no clearly observed geographic trend. Despite the fact that age groups differed from one study to another, age-specific HZ incidence rates seemed to hold steady during the review period, at around 1/1 000 children <10 years, around 2/1 000 adults aged <40 years, and around 1–4/1 000 adults aged 40–50 years. They then increased rapidly after age 50 years to around 7–8/1 000, up to 10/1 000 after 80 years of age. Our review confirms that in Europe HZ incidence increases with age, and quite drastically after 50 years of age. In all of the 21 studies included in the present review, incidence rates were higher among women than men, and this difference increased with age. This review also highlights the need to identify standardized surveillance methods to improve the comparability of data within European Union Member States and to monitor the impact of VZV immunization on the epidemiology of HZ. Conclusions: Available data in Europe have shortcomings which make an accurate assessment of HZ incidence and change over time impossible. However, data are indicative that HZ incidence is comparable, and increases with age in the same proportion across Europe.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are well established as effective treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes. GLP-1 RAs augment insulin secretion and suppress glucagon release via the stimulation of GLP-1 receptors. Although all GLP-1 RAs share the same underlying mechanism of action, they differ in terms of formulations, administration, injection devices and dosages. With six GLP-1 RAs currently available in Europe (namely, immediate-release exenatide, lixisenatide, liraglutide; prolonged-release exenatide, dulaglutide and semaglutide), each with its own characteristics and administration requirements, physicians caring for patients in their routine practice face the challenge of being cognizant of all this information so they are able to select the agent that is most suitable for their patient and use it in an efficient and optimal way. The objective of this review is to bring together practical information on the use of these GLP-1 RAs that reflects their approved use. Funding: Eli Lilly and Company. Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available for this article.

Background: SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are considered to be a first-line treatment for common conditions like type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure due to their proven ability to reduce cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. Despite these benefits, SGLT-2is are associated with certain adverse effects (AEs), particularly genitourinary (GU) events, which can lead to treatment discontinuation in some patients. Preventing these AEs is essential for maintaining the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2is. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of experts from various medical specialties reviewed the best available evidence on GU AEs associated with SGLT-2i therapy. The panel focused on the prevention and management of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and lower urinary tract symptoms in both the general population and high-risk groups, such as renal and cardiac transplant recipients. Results: The panel found that permanent discontinuation of SGLT-2is results in a rapid loss of cardiorenal benefits. Preventive strategies, including identifying high-risk patients before initiating therapy, are critical for minimizing GU AEs. Clinical trials show that most GU infections linked to SGLT-2i therapy are mild to moderate in severity and typically respond to standard antimicrobial treatment, without the need for discontinuation. Conclusions: Routine discontinuation of SGLT-2is due to GU AEs is not recommended. Therapy should be resumed as soon as possible, unless severe or persistent conditions contraindicate their use, in order to preserve the significant benefits of SGLT-2is in reducing cardiovascular and renal events

Background: Data on the epidemiology and costs related to herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in Spain are scarce; therefore, studies are needed to evaluate the epidemiological and economic impact of HZ and its most common complication, PHN. The present study aimed to estimate the clinical and economic burden of HZ and PHN in Valencia (Spain). Methods: We prospectively analyzed the burden of HZ and PHN and their attributable costs in patients from 25 general practices in the Autonomous Community of Valencia serving 36,030 persons aged > 14 years. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of HZ who attended these centers between December 1^st 2006 and November 30^th 2007 were asked to participate. Patients included were followed for 1 year. Results: Of the 130 cases of HZ followed up, continued pain was experienced by 47.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 35.6-56.7%) at 1 month after rash onset, by 14.5% (95% CI = 7.8-1.2%) at 3 months, by 9.0% (95% CI = 3.7-14.3%) at 6 months, and by 5.9% (95% CI = 1.5-10.3%) at 12 months. The percentage of patients with PHN increased with age, from 21.4% (95% CI = 8.3-40) in patients < 50 years to 59.2% (95% CI = 44.4-74) in patients ≥ 70 years. The estimated total cost for the 130 HZ cases during the follow-up period was €49,160 ($67,349). Mean cost per patient was €378 (range 53-2,830) ($517, range 73-3,877). Conclusions: This study shows that PHN is a relatively common complication of HZ and that both conditions combined give rise to a significant clinical and economic burden for patients and providers.

In terms of cardiovascular (CV) risk, diabetes, and CV disease (CVD) have been described as ‘two bad companions’. ¹ However, whether the risk of subsequent adverse CV events in patients with diabetes equals to that of those with previous CVD has been long debated. In this regard, some studies showed that the risk of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was similar to those with established coronary artery disease (CAD), thus in clinical practice T2DM might be considered as a ‘CAD equivalent’, ^2–4 but this concept was at odds with other studies. ^5–7 Two outstanding studies helped to unravel the controversy. ^{6, 7} In 2002, Evans et al. ⁶ found that patients with T2DM were at lower risk of CV outcomes than patients with CAD during an 8-year follow-up. In 2011, Wannamethee et al., ⁷ in 4045 men with T2DM aged 60–79 years and followed up for a mean of 9 years, provided evidence that only early-onset patients appeared to be a ‘CAD equivalent’. Notably, the results of these landmark studies were based on old cohorts of T2DM patients that were recruited in UK before year 2000. Thus, what we have learned is that risk levels approach CAD risk equivalence in T2DM patients after a decade or in those with target organ damage (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m², left ventricular hypertrophy or retinopathy) or three or more CV risk factors. ⁸ These concepts are reflected in recent European Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and CVD from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) ⁸ and allow the classification of patients with diabetes into three categories: very high, high, and moderate CV risk. Hence, the identification of T2DM patients at very high CV risk has important clinical and therapeutic implications.