Erdal Komut

Dr. Erdal Komut


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2016 in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
NKNalan Kozacı
Nalan Kozacı
MSMüge Sönmez
Müge Sönmez
FYFevzi Yılmaz
Fevzi Yılmaz
SKSeval KOMUT
Seval KOMUT
CYCihat Yel
Cihat Yel

1 October 2019 in Journal of Pediatric Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CACagatay E. Afsarlar
Cagatay E. Afsarlar
ECEmin Cakmakci
Emin Cakmakci
EDEmre Demir
Emre Demir
GGGuven Guney
Guven Guney
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
CKChester J. Koh
Chester J. Koh

10 July 2021 in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
MGMurat Golpinar
Murat Golpinar

24 June 2022 in Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMurat Golpinar
Murat Golpinar
HSHande Salim
Hande Salim
SOSerra Ozturk
Serra Ozturk
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
MSMuzaffer Sindel
Muzaffer Sindel

27 July 2019 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMustafa AVCI
Mustafa AVCI
NKNalan Kozaci
Nalan Kozaci
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
SKSeval KOMUT
Seval KOMUT
GCGulsum Caliskan
Gulsum Caliskan
GTGul Tulubas
Gul Tulubas
Background and objectives: The optic nerve is a component of the central nervous system, and the optic nerve sheath is connected to the subarachnoid space. For this reason, intracranial pressure (ICP) increases are directly transmitted to the optic nerve sheath. Knowing the normal optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) range in a healthy population is necessary to interpret this measurement as a sign of intracranial pressure in clinical practice and research. In this study, we aimed to determine the standard ONSD value in healthy adultsaged65 years of age or older who had not previously been diagnosed with a disease that could increase the ICP. Materials and Methods: The right and left ONSD values and ONSD differences were compared, according to the gender of the patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups, according to their age. The age groups were assigned as follows: Group 1: 65–74 years of age; Group 2: 75–84 years of age; and Group 3: 85 years of age or older. The ONSDs and the ONSD difference between the left and right eyes of Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 were compared. Results: The study included 195 volunteers. The mean ONSD of both eyes was 4.16±0.69 mm, and the difference between the ONSD of the left and right eyes was 0.16±0.18 mm. There was no difference between genders in terms of right ONSD, left ONSD, mean ONSD and ONSD difference between the left and right eyes. There was no correlation between age and ONSD and ONSD difference. When the age groups and ONSD were compared, no difference was found between the groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, the ONSDs of both eyes do not vary with age in healthy adults aged65 years or older. ONSD does not vary between genders. The calculation of ONSD difference can be used to determine ICP increase.

3 January 2021 in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKErdal Komut
Erdal Komut
SZSinan Zehir
Sinan Zehir
Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictability of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in the prenatal period by means of evaluating fetal hips using the Graf method on obstetric ultrasonography (US) after the 34th week of gestation. Methods: A total of 84 pregnant women (mean age = 27.04; age range = 19-46 years), who were referred to our radiology clinic for an obstetric US examination in the third trimester, and their fetuses were included in this study. In the obstetric US, alpha angles of both hips of the fetuses were measured based on Graf’s method, and each case was assessed ultrasonographically by a second physician at 6-10 postnatal weeks. Prenatal and postnatal hips were then classified according to alpha angles as ≥ 60° or < 60°. The kappa coefficients between the diagnoses based on prenatal and postnatal alpha angles were calculated. Results: According to the postnatal alpha angle, 77 fetuses were diagnosed to have type 1 right hip and 7 fetuses had type 2A right hip. The prenatal alpha angle provided the same results (77 type 1 and 7 type 2A right hips). Similarly, the postnatal alpha angle revealed type 1 left hip in 82 fetuses and type 2A left hip in 2 fetuses, which was the same as the diagnoses based on the prenatal alpha angles. There was a complete agreement between prenatal and postnatal alpha measurements for both the left and right hips (kappa = 1.00, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Evidence from this study has revealed that DDH can be identified by obstetric ultrasonographic examinations in the prenatal period. Cite this article as: Komut E, Zehir S. Can developmental dysplasia of the hip be identified in the prenatal period? A pilot study: Ultrasonographic evaluation and postnatal follow-up results of fetal hips in the third trimester. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021; 55(3): 196-200.