Zircons in transport in the modern Amazon River range from coarse silt to medium sand. Older grains are smaller on average: Mesozoic and Cenozoic grains have average equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) 122 ± 42 μm (lower fine sand), whereas grains >2000 Ma have average ESD 67 ± 14 μm (upper coarse silt). As a full Wentworth size class separates the two values, zircons in these age populations are hydraulically distinct. Host sand size is correlated with average size of co-transported zircons, implying hydrodynamic fractionation. Zircon size is positively correlated with percent medium sand, and inversely correlated with percent very fine sand (p 50% medium sand, average zircon size is 100 μm, compared with 80 μm in samples with >50% very fine sand. We infer from these data that zircon deposition is not size-blind, and that zircons track with hydraulically comparable sand grains. As different aged grains tend to have different characteristic sizes, this indicates the possibility of hydrodynamic fractionation of age populations. Five samples representing different hydrodynamic microenvironments of a single dune present significantly different detrital zircon age spectra, apparently the result of hydraulic processes. Peak mismatch (age peaks failing to overlap at 2σ level) is the most common disparity; but age populations present in some samples are missing from other samples. The lack of correspondence among the samples appears to exceed that attributable to random sampling. We conclude that hydrodynamic fractionation of zircons and zircon-age populations does occur. Zircon size should therefore be taken into consideration in detrital zircon provenance analysis.

Detrital zircon U-Pb ages determined by SHRIMP distinguish two clastic sequences among Proterozoic metasedi- mentary rocks from central Madagascar. The Itremo Group is older: zircon data, stromatolite characteristics, and carbon isotope data all point to a depositional age around 1500-1700 Ma. The Molo Group is younger, deposited between ∼620 Ma (the age of the youngest zircon) and ∼560 Ma (the age of metamorphic overgrowths on detrital cores). Geochronologic provenance analysis of the Itremo Group points to sources in East Africa as well as local sources in central and southern Madagascar but provides no evidence for a detrital contribution from northern and eastern Madagascar nor from southern India. Detrital zircon and sedimentologic similarities between rocks of the Itremo Group and the Zambian Muva Supergroup suggest a lithostratigraphic correlation between the two. The Molo Group has a strong 1000-1100 Ma detrital signature that also indicates an east African provenance and suggests a Neoproterozoic geographic connection with Sri Lanka but shows no indication of input from the Dharwar craton and eastern Madagascar. Central Madagascar was probably juxtaposed with the Tanzanian craton in the Paleo- and Mesoproterozoic, whereas northern and eastern Madagascar were connected to India. Internal assembly of Madagascar postdates Neoproterozoic Molo Group sedimentation and is likely to have occurred at about 560 Ma. Online enhancements: appendix, table.