Giulia Pavese

Dr. Giulia Pavese

Italian National Research Council (CNR), Rome, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2014 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSilvia Sandrini
Silvia Sandrini
Sandro FuzziSandro Fuzzi
Sandro Fuzzi
APAndrea Piazzalunga
Andrea Piazzalunga
PPPaolo Prati
Paolo Prati
PBPaolo Bonasoni
Paolo Bonasoni
SGStefania Gilardoni
Stefania Gilardoni

27 July 2008 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IFIrene Fiorucci
Irene Fiorucci
GMGiovanni Muscari
Giovanni Muscari
CBCesidio Bianchi
Cesidio Bianchi
Paolo Di GirolamoPaolo Di Girolamo
Paolo Di Girolamo
FEFrancesco Esposito
Francesco Esposito
RZRobert L. de Zafra
Robert L. de Zafra
Observations of very low amounts of precipitable water vapor (PWV) by means of the Ground‐Based Millimeter wave Spectrometer (GBMS) are discussed. Low amounts of column water vapor (between 0.5 and 4 mm) are typical of high mountain sites and polar regions, especially during winter, and are difficult to measure accurately because of the lack of sensitivity of conventional instruments to such low PWV contents. The technique used involves the measurement of atmospheric opacity in the range between 230 and 280 GHz with a spectral resolution of 4 GHz, followed by the conversion to precipitable water vapor using a linear relationship. We present the intercomparison of this data set with simultaneous PWV observations obtained with Vaisala RS92k radiosondes, a Raman lidar, and an IR Fourier transform spectrometer. These sets of measurements were carried out during the primary field campaign of the Earth Cooling by Water vapor Radiation (ECOWAR) project which took place at Breuil‐Cervinia (45.9°N, 7.6°E, elevation 1990 m) and Plateau Rosa (45.9°N, 7.7°E, elevation 3490 m), Italy, from 3 to 16 March 2007. GBMS PWV measurements show a good agreement with the other three data sets exhibiting a mean difference between observations of ≃9%. The considerable number of data points available for the GBMS versus lidar PWV correlation allows an additional analysis which indicates negligible systematic differences between the two data sets.

4 December 2015 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GPGiulia Pavese
Giulia Pavese
ALAntonio Lettino
Antonio Lettino
MCM. Calvello
M. Calvello
FEF. Esposito
F. Esposito
SFSaverio Fiore
Saverio Fiore

7 May 2018 in Condensed Matter
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAntonio Speranza
Antonio Speranza
RCRosa Caggiano
Rosa Caggiano
GPGiulia Pavese
Giulia Pavese
VSVito Summa
Vito Summa
Compositional data analysis was applied on mineral element concentrations (i.e., Al, Ti, Si, Ca, Mg, Fe, Sr) content in PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 simultaneous measurements at three characteristic environmental sites: kerbside, background and rural site. Different possible sources of mineral trace elements affecting the PM in the considered sites were highlighted. Particularly, results show that compositional data analysis allows for the assessment of chemical/physical differences between mineral element concentrations of PM. These differences can be associated with both different kinds of involved mineral sources and different mechanisms of accumulation/dispersion of PM at the considered sites.

1 January 1993 in Aerosol Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VCV. Cuomo
V. Cuomo
FEFrancesco Esposito
Francesco Esposito
GPGiulia Pavese
Giulia Pavese
Carmine SerioCarmine Serio
Carmine Serio
The dependence of Ångstrom's turbidity parameters on the wavelength has been analyzed in the wavelength interval 0.45–0.70 μm. Measurements of aerosol optical thicknesses in this range were obtained by a wide-range grating spectrometer with a resolution of ∼ 2.5 nm. Based on such measurements, two different methods for obtaining turbidity parameters have been validated and intercompared: (a) the ratio method based on processing couples of aerosol optical depths, and (b) a linear best-fitting method based on log-log plot of aerosol optical thicknesses vs. wavelength. We found that Angstr̊m's turbidity relation is quite effective in characterizing atmospheric aerosol in low-medium turbidity cases. However, the usual method of computing the turbidity parameters on the basis of a few measurements (< 10) does not produce adequate results. Accurate estimates can be only obtained using a larger number of data points

28 June 2022 in Atmospheric Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GPGiulia Pavese
Giulia Pavese
FAFrancesca Agresti
Francesca Agresti
MCMariarosaria Calvello
Mariarosaria Calvello
FEFrancesco Esposito
Francesco Esposito
ALAntonio Lettino
Antonio Lettino