The aim of this article is to propose novel damage indices for damage localization and quantification based on time series modeling. In order to extract damage-sensitive features from time series models, it is essential to choose adequate and robust orders in such a way that the models are able to extract uncorrelated residuals. On this basis, a new iterative order determination method is proposed to select robust orders of time series models under residual analysis by Ljung–Box Q-test. The damage-sensitive features are the parameters and residuals of an AutoRegressive (AR) model obtained from current feature extraction approaches. In this study, the AR model is identified as the most compatible time series model with measured vibration time-domain responses using Box–Jenkins methodology and Leybourne–McCabe hypothesis test. The proposed damage indices are the parametric assurance criterion and the residual reliability criterion that exploit the parameters and residuals of AR models, respectively. The main idea behind locating a damage is to define threshold limits for both damage indices using the features of undamaged conditions based on an unsupervised learning way. The major contributions of this article are to propose an iterative order determination method for time series models and two novel damage indices for locating and quantifying damage. The accuracy and performance of the proposed methods are experimentally demonstrated on a three-story laboratory frame and a model-scale steel structure. Results show that the proposed iterative approach leads to uncorrelated residuals, and the proposed parametric assurance criterion and the residual reliability criterion methods are promising and efficient tools in damage detection problems under varying operational and environmental conditions.

Recent advances in sensor technologies and data acquisition systems opened up the era of big data in the field of structural health monitoring (SHM). Data-driven methods based on statistical pattern recognition provide outstanding opportunities to implement a long-term SHM strategy, by exploiting measured vibration data. However, their main limitation, due to big data or high-dimensional features, is linked to the complex and time-consuming procedures for feature extraction and/or statistical decision-making. To cope with this issue, in this article we propose a strategy based on autoregressive moving average (ARMA) modeling for feature extraction, and on an innovative hybrid divergence-based method for feature classification. Data relevant to a cable-stayed bridge are accounted for to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed method. The results show that the offered hybrid divergence-based method, in conjunction with ARMA modeling, succeeds in detecting damage in cases strongly characterized by big data.

Feature extraction by time-series analysis and decision making through distance-based methods are powerful and efficient statistical pattern recognition techniques for data-driven structural health monitoring. The motivation of this article is to propose an innovative residual-based feature extraction approach based on AutoRegressive modeling and a novel statistical distance method named as Partition-based Kullback–Leibler Divergence for damage detection and localization by using randomly high-dimensional damage-sensitive features under environmental and operational variability. The key novel element of the proposed feature extraction approach is to establish a two-stage offline and online learning algorithms for extracting the residuals of AutoRegressive model as the main damage-sensitive features. This technique brings the great benefit of reducing the computational time and storage space for feature extraction in long-term monitoring conditions. The major contribution of Partition-based Kullback–Leibler Divergence method is to exploit a partitioning strategy for dividing random features into individual partitions and utilize numerical information of partitioning in distance calculation rather than directly applying random samples. Dealing with the major challenging issue of using the high-dimensional features in decision making and applicability to both correlated and uncorrelated random datasets are the main advantages of Partition-based Kullback–Leibler Divergence method. The accuracy and reliability of the proposed approaches are experimentally validated by two well-known benchmark structures. The stationarity and linearity of measured vibration responses for using in AutoRegressive modeling are evaluated by two hypothesis tests. Comparative studies are also conducted to demonstrate the superiority of the proposed methods over some exciting state-of-the-art techniques. Results show that the methods presented here succeed in detecting and locating damage and make time-saving and efficient tools for feature extraction and damage diagnosis.